
NeanderthalMax
Just don't shower, bro
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2020
- Posts
- 189
- Reputation
- 425
I know ES ratio is the most important thing when it comes to IPD. However, I also heard people say that instead, the best determining rule of good IPD is if you can fit a third eye in between your eyes. Which one is it? Would someone who doesn't meet the eye-in-between rule but has an ideal ES ratio still look good?
I tried morphing O'Pry (first morph, so go easy) with smaller PFL causing greater distance between his medial canthus and it honestly doesn't seem to make a huge difference, it definitely decreases attractiveness, but doesn't seem too bad. Note: ES was kept constant (first original, second morphed):
Honestly, makes him seem more like a big cat with a wider gap, still prefer the original tho:
I think ES ratio wins as the stronger rule to determine good IPD, and the "eye-in-between" rule is not as important. What do y'all think?
I tried morphing O'Pry (first morph, so go easy) with smaller PFL causing greater distance between his medial canthus and it honestly doesn't seem to make a huge difference, it definitely decreases attractiveness, but doesn't seem too bad. Note: ES was kept constant (first original, second morphed):


Honestly, makes him seem more like a big cat with a wider gap, still prefer the original tho:

I think ES ratio wins as the stronger rule to determine good IPD, and the "eye-in-between" rule is not as important. What do y'all think?