Bidelt + Bicromial v2

himooke

himooke

Iron
Joined
Aug 19, 2024
Posts
142
Reputation
60
Im 14 and i have a roughly 22 inch bidelt and a 18.5 inch bicromial length ( been working out only upper body for 2 weeks). For extra info im 5’9 and i have a 26 inch waist circumference. Could this be from how i measured and if so what would be the correct way to measure it.
 
Pics or I don't give a FUCK
IMG 1363
IMG 1365
These are the best pictures i take rn lmk if you need one from the back
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bryce
22" bidelt would put you in the top 90-95th percentile, from the looks of it im not seeing much of that, show us a photo of your back
IMG 1367
relaxed pic of my back ignore shit posture
 
Sorry to break it to ya bub, but ur bidelt isnt 22in

Plus ur short and if u rly did have 22in bidelt you'd look a lot wider
 
  • +1
Reactions: 59H390, Bitchwhipper2 and slaters
Your frames still good though and good insertions just keep working out
 
  • +1
Reactions: himooke
Sorry to break it to ya bub, but ur bidelt isnt 22in

Plus ur short and if u rly did have 22in bidelt you'd look a lot wider
Literally first thing I saw while looking it up "if you had a 22in bidelt and you were short you'd be a contender in Mr. Olympia"
 
  • +1
Reactions: 59H390
quite literally what i measured 3 seperate times on a tailors tape jfl + had other people measure for me
Its sliding door method or nothing. You look framecel to me
 
nigga u a framecel with straight clavicles thats all
 
22 inch bidelt with this proportion you have to be like 6'2-6'3 or smth
you cant measure your bidelt properly by yourself, get someone to do it for you, with the right tool
I had someone measure from my lateral delt to lateral delt using a tailor’s tape and it came up to be 22inch
 
Sorry to break it to ya bub, but ur bidelt isnt 22in

Plus ur short and if u rly did have 22in bidelt you'd look a lot wider
camera distortion a real bitch no cope i look much wider irl compared to pictures
 
I had someone measure from my lateral delt to lateral delt using a tailor’s tape and it came up to be 22inch
a tape isnt straight, you also added in the curvature of your back (or chest if he did it from the front
you have to use smth like that

1756128211861
 
Debunking OP his claims.
OP claims to have a 22 inch bidelt and a 18.5 inch biacrominal.
lets figure out his actual stats.


Screenshot 20250825 152820 ImageMeter

For this picture i made the bizygomatic the reference point and made it 14cm (higher end average)
and as we can see his bidelt is 3.25x bigger than his bizygomatic width so 14 x 3.25 = 45.5 cm which comes to about 18 inches

Recap: OP his bidelt is around 18 inches and NOT 22


Screenshot 20250825 152902 ImageMeter

now his biacromial, once again ive made his bizygomatic width the reference scale with 14cm (higher end average)
as we can see in the measurement i made we can see that his biacromial is about 2.3x bigger than his bizygomatic width so 14 x 2.3 = 32.2 cm which comes to about 13 inches

Recap: OP his biacromial is around 13 inches and NOT 18.5





MY CALCULATIONS ARENT 100% CORRECT BUT ITS MORE TO GIVE YOU THE IDEA, YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THAT HIS MEASUREMENTS ARE WAY SMALLER THAN HE SAYS.




@idkmanimao @vincentzygo @Bryce @Zagro
@chadisbeingmade (cibm mirins my calculations)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bryce
Debunking OP his claims.
OP claims to have a 22 inch bidelt and a 18.5 inch biacrominal.
lets figure out his actual stats.


View attachment 4051998

For this picture i made the bizygomatic the reference point and made it 14cm (higher end average)
and as we can see his bidelt is 3.25x bigger than his bizygomatic width so 14 x 3.25 = 45.5 cm which comes to about 18 inches

Recap: OP his bidelt is around 18 inches and NOT 22


View attachment 4051999

now his biacromial, once again ive made his bizygomatic width the reference scale with 14cm (higher end average)
as we can see in the measurement i made we can see that his biacromial is about 2.3x bigger than his bizygomatic width so 14 x 2.3 = 32.2 cm which comes to about 13 inches

Recap: OP his biacromial is around 13 inches and NOT 18.5





MY CALCULATIONS ARENT 100% CORRECT BUT ITS MORE TO GIVE YOU THE IDEA, YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THAT HIS MEASUREMENTS ARE WAY SMALLER THAN HE SAYS.




@idkmanimao @vincentzygo @Bryce @Zagro
@chadisbeingmade (cibm mirins my calculations)
tape measure says otherwise 💔
 
Debunking OP his claims.
OP claims to have a 22 inch bidelt and a 18.5 inch biacrominal.
lets figure out his actual stats.


View attachment 4051998

For this picture i made the bizygomatic the reference point and made it 14cm (higher end average)
and as we can see his bidelt is 3.25x bigger than his bizygomatic width so 14 x 3.25 = 45.5 cm which comes to about 18 inches

Recap: OP his bidelt is around 18 inches and NOT 22


View attachment 4051999

now his biacromial, once again ive made his bizygomatic width the reference scale with 14cm (higher end average)
as we can see in the measurement i made we can see that his biacromial is about 2.3x bigger than his bizygomatic width so 14 x 2.3 = 32.2 cm which comes to about 13 inches

Recap: OP his biacromial is around 13 inches and NOT 18.5





MY CALCULATIONS ARENT 100% CORRECT BUT ITS MORE TO GIVE YOU THE IDEA, YOU CAN CLEARLY SEE THAT HIS MEASUREMENTS ARE WAY SMALLER THAN HE SAYS.




@idkmanimao @vincentzygo @Bryce @Zagro
@chadisbeingmade (cibm mirins my calculations)
Vincentzygo disappeared from the face of planet earth brotato 🥀🥀🥀
 
  • So Sad
Reactions: Bryce

Similar threads

yeeyeeass69
Replies
11
Views
119
Yahya
Yahya
I
Replies
37
Views
216
idkmanimao
I
subltn
Replies
16
Views
182
2414763h
2414763h
S
Replies
8
Views
211
mumbai.chad
mumbai.chad
Zheng
Replies
14
Views
255
59H390
59H390

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top