Blackpill Is not related to genes or reproductive succes,It Is something from other reality plane

[imabetanumale]

We all know beauty Is objective and that all women lust over the same certain features, but my doubt Is: if having these features increases reproductive succes,and all women want them and mostly all women can have sex with men who has these features, why these types of beatiful men aré so rare? Shouldnt It be that only beatiful men with these features aré born if these traits aré desirable, and It means that It increases reproductive succes? Why aré they not the common?

You could argue that Is that the standards have rised and what was considered beatiful now Is average. But blackpill Is based that Beauty Is objective,so if standards has increased It only would mean that beign somewhat pretty isnt enough,but we could still measure beauty and if Its objective Its also atemporal, so the same face in different scenarios and epoch would have the same beauty measure.
So Its not standards.

You could also argue that is because women fears beign with Chad because the could become single mothers or get cheated on. But It also gets debunked by all the Tinder experiments that show how they have no fears of beign even with a criminal if he Is beautiful, also remember the juggernaut law: the most ugly women can get even chads cock because Is seen as Easy,so she could get pregnant from Chad, from the latter you could say: "Its the anticonceptives methods,she doesnt get pregnant from Chad but later from a betabuxx" so according to that lógic before anconceptives people were more beautiful than now, so our great grand parent should be prettier in their young years, but I think there Is no proof for that.
So Its not that they dont get pregnant from casual sex.

Finally you could say: : "Its the dual mating strategy of women, they go with Chad in their prime but dont get pregnant and then when they are old they settle down for a betabuxx and make a family". Again,we proved that if It was anconceptives methods fault,in the past people should have been prettier, so in the past women didnt got pregnant from Chad. Also if they dual mating strategy who means they get pregnant from Chad, actually makes women get pregnant from a beta It just doesnt make sense and It would be a Fake theory, since at the end they give birth to beta children.
So Its not the dual mating strategy.

Then we should discuss why we see as beautiful certain features and not others. The first thing one thinks Is: "that traits makes someone fitter,meaning he can surivive and reproduce more in a primitive enviorement (not in the present enviorement because Is so much easier to survive)". First of all, hair doesnt help to survive, neither blue eyes,white skin,blonde hair,long eyelashes, and not to talk about all the face proportiond that makes someone beautiful. Scientist have hypothesis like: good genes come in packs, It shows hormonal balance, shows body health, but these aré not even theories, meaning have not been proved.

But dont worry,our case isnt something too rare. Scientist have seen animales who mate according to certain traits that scientist still dont know why aré attractive if they dont represent an advantage.

So,Why this happens? the theory:
Its not evolution, brain neurochemicals, enviorement,personal taste or other things what makes us think something Is beautiful, if we all agree a person Is beautiful and other Is ugly and Its not evolution,because how we proved if It was evolution we all would be beautiful, It means there Is something telling us, along with other animals,what Is beautiful,Is something universal,in a higher reality plain and It can interact with us. Its really interesting that we proved that Sense of Beauty exist and Is not in our plain, what other things exist in that reality plain?

//imabetanumale//

 

[flippasav]

Cope ngl

 

[vernier]

Too much words bhai
Women choose chads

 

[hybobu]

no one reading this shit

 

[imabetanumale]

@John Cracovizk
It Is high IQ?

 

[imabetanumale]

Too much words bhai
Women choose chads

But Why?

 

[vernier]

But Why?

Because they r attractive and wet women

 

[imabetanumale]

Because they r attractive and wet women

In the post I say why we consider some people beautiful and not others, and Is not genes

 

[CookieGuy]

Hi this is really really stupid! Beauty is not 100% objective. If that was the case all girls would love drago and fangirl over him. Obviously healthy traits are attractive tho, but types are incredibly important

 

[vernier]

In the post I say why we consider some people beautiful and not others, and Is not genes

Pheno and features that makes chad so beautiful r determined by genes. Women automatically feel attraction towards them, as every1 in nature moves towards beautiful and attractive things, even animals with less consciousness than us

 

[imabetanumale]

Pheno and features that makes chad so beautiful r determined by genes. Women automatically feel attraction towards them, as every1 in nature moves towards beautiful and attractive things, even animals with less consciousness than us

In the post I explain that,yes,genes makes you attractive, but nothing Is just because, you aré saying that what Is beautiful but Im saying Why Is beautiful. If aré genes what makes us attractive we all think evolution made us like certain traits. But I debunk that theory and show why It Is something else

 

[imabetanumale]

Pheno and features that makes chad so beautiful r determined by genes. Women automatically feel attraction towards them, as every1 in nature moves towards beautiful and attractive things, even animals with less consciousness than us

Read the post please and you will understand

 

[vernier]

In the post I explain that,yes,genes makes you attractive, but nothing Is just because, you aré saying that what Is beautiful but Im saying Why Is beautiful. If aré genes what makes us attractive we all think evolution made us like certain traits. But I debunk that theory and show why It Is something else

Read the post please and you will understand

I will

 

[WeiWei]

I want a Jap's foid's bare feetsoles

 

[imabetanumale]

TL;DR: we dont see as beautiful certain traits because of evolution,so Its something else.

(The arguments on because Is not evolution aré in the OP.)

 

[imabetanumale]

Bump

 

[imabetanumale]

Bump

 

[imabetanumale]

Bump

 

[user123456]

This is actually true but these incels won't know

 

[John Cracovizk]

We all know beauty Is objective and that all women lust over the same certain features, but my doubt Is: if having these features increases reproductive succes,and all women want them and mostly all women can have sex with men who has these features, why these types of beatiful men aré so rare? Shouldnt It be that only beatiful men with these features aré born if these traits aré desirable, and It means that It increases reproductive succes? Why aré they not the common?

You could argue that Is that the standards have rised and what was considered beatiful now Is average. But blackpill Is based that Beauty Is objective,so if standards has increased It only would mean that beign somewhat pretty isnt enough,but we could still measure beauty and if Its objective Its also atemporal, so the same face in different scenarios and epoch would have the same beauty measure.
So Its not standards.

You could also argue that is because women fears beign with Chad because the could become single mothers or get cheated on. But It also gets debunked by all the Tinder experiments that show how they have no fears of beign even with a criminal if he Is beautiful, also remember the juggernaut law: the most ugly women can get even chads cock because Is seen as Easy,so she could get pregnant from Chad, from the latter you could say: "Its the anticonceptives methods,she doesnt get pregnant from Chad but later from a betabuxx" so according to that lógic before anconceptives people were more beautiful than now, so our great grand parent should be prettier in their young years, but I think there Is no proof for that.
So Its not that they dont get pregnant from casual sex.

Finally you could say: : "Its the dual mating strategy of women, they go with Chad in their prime but dont get pregnant and then when they are old they settle down for a betabuxx and make a family". Again,we proved that if It was anconceptives methods fault,in the past people should have been prettier, so in the past women didnt got pregnant from Chad. Also if they dual mating strategy who means they get pregnant from Chad, actually makes women get pregnant from a beta It just doesnt make sense and It would be a Fake theory, since at the end they give birth to beta children.
So Its not the dual mating strategy.

Then we should discuss why we see as beautiful certain features and not others. The first thing one thinks Is: "that traits makes someone fitter,meaning he can surivive and reproduce more in a primitive enviorement (not in the present enviorement because Is so much easier to survive)". First of all, hair doesnt help to survive, neither blue eyes,white skin,blonde hair,long eyelashes, and not to talk about all the face proportiond that makes someone beautiful. Scientist have hypothesis like: good genes come in packs, It shows hormonal balance, shows body health, but these aré not even theories, meaning have not been proved.

But dont worry,our case isnt something too rare. Scientist have seen animales who mate according to certain traits that scientist still dont know why aré attractive if they dont represent an advantage.

So,Why this happens? the theory:
Its not evolution, brain neurochemicals, enviorement,personal taste or other things what makes us think something Is beautiful, if we all agree a person Is beautiful and other Is ugly and Its not evolution,because how we proved if It was evolution we all would be beautiful, It means there Is something telling us, along with other animals,what Is beautiful,Is something universal,in a higher reality plain and It can interact with us. Its really interesting that we proved that Sense of Beauty exist and Is not in our plain, what other things exist in that reality plain?

//imabetanumale//

This is a very interesting question, and I have reflected on it as well in conversations outside of this site. The conclusion we came to involves both evolutionary and social aspects (remember that humans are biopsychosocial beings). In the past, the role of provider and protector played by men was essential for survival, which led women, historically, to be attracted to traits that indicated strength, security, and the ability to provide, selecting men based on these qualities. On the other hand, men, in terms of sexual selection, tended to value physical beauty (to increase the odds of a child being born, wide hips, big boobs), which explains why most women can attract partners more easily.

When we talk about objectively attractive traits, remember that they may not have been the only criteria for selection throughout history. Societies evolved, and for a long time, other characteristics, such as the ability to provide and protect, were equally or even more important than physical appearance. A clear example is that many men can achieve aesthetically attractive and strong bodies through training and diet.

Nowadays, in first-world countries, it is noticeable that the state has taken on much of the responsibility, making provision and security almost irrelevant. Here in Latin America, there is still great value placed on the man who 'pays the bills' and is able to provide for his family, given the failures of the social state here. In the end, that’s what was left to select. 'Handsome men' in terms of facial features are rarely the norm because, throughout evolution, other characteristics had equal or greater weight in sexual selection. Even though aesthetic traits are attractive, they have not, by themselves, guaranteed greater reproductive success.

 

[Acion]

We all know beauty Is objective and that all women lust over the same certain features, but my doubt Is: if having these features increases reproductive succes,and all women want them and mostly all women can have sex with men who has these features, why these types of beatiful men aré so rare? Shouldnt It be that only beatiful men with these features aré born if these traits aré desirable, and It means that It increases reproductive succes? Why aré they not the common?

You could argue that Is that the standards have rised and what was considered beatiful now Is average. But blackpill Is based that Beauty Is objective,so if standards has increased It only would mean that beign somewhat pretty isnt enough,but we could still measure beauty and if Its objective Its also atemporal, so the same face in different scenarios and epoch would have the same beauty measure.
So Its not standards.

You could also argue that is because women fears beign with Chad because the could become single mothers or get cheated on. But It also gets debunked by all the Tinder experiments that show how they have no fears of beign even with a criminal if he Is beautiful, also remember the juggernaut law: the most ugly women can get even chads cock because Is seen as Easy,so she could get pregnant from Chad, from the latter you could say: "Its the anticonceptives methods,she doesnt get pregnant from Chad but later from a betabuxx" so according to that lógic before anconceptives people were more beautiful than now, so our great grand parent should be prettier in their young years, but I think there Is no proof for that.
So Its not that they dont get pregnant from casual sex.

Finally you could say: : "Its the dual mating strategy of women, they go with Chad in their prime but dont get pregnant and then when they are old they settle down for a betabuxx and make a family". Again,we proved that if It was anconceptives methods fault,in the past people should have been prettier, so in the past women didnt got pregnant from Chad. Also if they dual mating strategy who means they get pregnant from Chad, actually makes women get pregnant from a beta It just doesnt make sense and It would be a Fake theory, since at the end they give birth to beta children.
So Its not the dual mating strategy.

Then we should discuss why we see as beautiful certain features and not others. The first thing one thinks Is: "that traits makes someone fitter,meaning he can surivive and reproduce more in a primitive enviorement (not in the present enviorement because Is so much easier to survive)". First of all, hair doesnt help to survive, neither blue eyes,white skin,blonde hair,long eyelashes, and not to talk about all the face proportiond that makes someone beautiful. Scientist have hypothesis like: good genes come in packs, It shows hormonal balance, shows body health, but these aré not even theories, meaning have not been proved.

But dont worry,our case isnt something too rare. Scientist have seen animales who mate according to certain traits that scientist still dont know why aré attractive if they dont represent an advantage.

So,Why this happens? the theory:
Its not evolution, brain neurochemicals, enviorement,personal taste or other things what makes us think something Is beautiful, if we all agree a person Is beautiful and other Is ugly and Its not evolution,because how we proved if It was evolution we all would be beautiful, It means there Is something telling us, along with other animals,what Is beautiful,Is something universal,in a higher reality plain and It can interact with us. Its really interesting that we proved that Sense of Beauty exist and Is not in our plain, what other things exist in that reality plain?

//imabetanumale//

Beauty is subjective. That's why I like different looking foids than you do.

 

[noodlelover]

Healthy will always be more attractive than non-healthy, but you're right in that most of the specifics come down to cultural programming.