Acromegaly_Chad
Offical Surgery Consultant
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2020
- Posts
- 2,098
- Reputation
- 5,377
(Warning: This is going to be a high IQ philosophical thread, do not continue if you are low IQ). And yes I'm writing this totally drunk so might regret this tomorrow.
When the manosphere presents and debates the blackpill, we are often faced with the argument that our theory is solely based on selective empirical evidence or mere evolutionary theory that doesn't hold true to modern developed societies. It seems like we are lacking a broader, conceptualized framework to explain the discrepancy between the perception of reality of a bluepiller and a blackpiller.
This is exactly what I'd like to do here, explaining this discrepancy with the help of a philosophical framework, namely the concept of the Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant.
Now this concept was introduced by Kant as a counterargument against religious philosophy, so the main usage of the conceot was to alter the way we approach faith, god and religion.
Critique doesn't mean a negative rating but rather a critical discussion, emphasing both on the good and the bad.
Reason means the ability to think clearly, unbiased, to perceive and reason the environment the way it is and to KNOW it without backing it up by experience and knowledge. It would mean that if you haven't ever been exposed to any culture or knowledge, on the first sight you would still know that a chair was made to sit on it for example.
So in a whole, his theory investigates what the human mind is able to grasp and make reason of without priorily having been exposed to experience or knowledge. He comes to the conclusion that - as opposed to prior concepts according to which we perceived things the way they were and we didn't perceive things our senses couldn't perceive - the things are solely dependent on the way we perceive them, and for metaphysical things, we'd take auxiliary constructs but we can't objectively prove them since we can't grasp them with our senses, therefore the also cannot be a proof of god.
Now how does this connect to the blackpill?
Very simple: The bluepiller falls prey to Kants theory, he perceives the things in this world based on experience, knowledge (bluepilled shitty things he has read somewhere), he falls prey to the cucked framing of our society and even more so, many looks theory related things in life remain a mistery for him, a metaphysical experience that is explained by the auxiliary construct of even more bluepilled, shitty ideology that is equally as wrong as religion.
As opposed to that the blackpiller is able to grasp looks theory related things truly the way they are, his perception depends on the things and not the other way round, he sees the reality without a cucked bluepill framing, looks theory therefore isn't a metaphysical experience that he has to explain with bluepilled shit, but fir the blackpiller it is simply perceived, objective reality and things, that are not distorted.
So to sum this up, Blackpillers literally transcend Kants theory regarding lookism compared to the bluepillers, and this is why life and reality makes so much sense, is so easy to explain for us and we don't need hyper complex explanations like bluepillers (game, feminism, personality, mysoginy etc.) to explain our reality.
When the manosphere presents and debates the blackpill, we are often faced with the argument that our theory is solely based on selective empirical evidence or mere evolutionary theory that doesn't hold true to modern developed societies. It seems like we are lacking a broader, conceptualized framework to explain the discrepancy between the perception of reality of a bluepiller and a blackpiller.
This is exactly what I'd like to do here, explaining this discrepancy with the help of a philosophical framework, namely the concept of the Critique of Pure Reason by Immanuel Kant.
Now this concept was introduced by Kant as a counterargument against religious philosophy, so the main usage of the conceot was to alter the way we approach faith, god and religion.
Critique doesn't mean a negative rating but rather a critical discussion, emphasing both on the good and the bad.
Reason means the ability to think clearly, unbiased, to perceive and reason the environment the way it is and to KNOW it without backing it up by experience and knowledge. It would mean that if you haven't ever been exposed to any culture or knowledge, on the first sight you would still know that a chair was made to sit on it for example.
So in a whole, his theory investigates what the human mind is able to grasp and make reason of without priorily having been exposed to experience or knowledge. He comes to the conclusion that - as opposed to prior concepts according to which we perceived things the way they were and we didn't perceive things our senses couldn't perceive - the things are solely dependent on the way we perceive them, and for metaphysical things, we'd take auxiliary constructs but we can't objectively prove them since we can't grasp them with our senses, therefore the also cannot be a proof of god.
Now how does this connect to the blackpill?
Very simple: The bluepiller falls prey to Kants theory, he perceives the things in this world based on experience, knowledge (bluepilled shitty things he has read somewhere), he falls prey to the cucked framing of our society and even more so, many looks theory related things in life remain a mistery for him, a metaphysical experience that is explained by the auxiliary construct of even more bluepilled, shitty ideology that is equally as wrong as religion.
As opposed to that the blackpiller is able to grasp looks theory related things truly the way they are, his perception depends on the things and not the other way round, he sees the reality without a cucked bluepill framing, looks theory therefore isn't a metaphysical experience that he has to explain with bluepilled shit, but fir the blackpiller it is simply perceived, objective reality and things, that are not distorted.
So to sum this up, Blackpillers literally transcend Kants theory regarding lookism compared to the bluepillers, and this is why life and reality makes so much sense, is so easy to explain for us and we don't need hyper complex explanations like bluepillers (game, feminism, personality, mysoginy etc.) to explain our reality.
