Body mog, size vs aesthetics?

[Pietrosiek]

Both dudes same height. One has thin bones, good shoulder to waist, ripped good bf with decent amount of musle. Other dude, thick bones, averge shoulder to waist but overall wider with both hips, waist and shoulders wider, more musle and more bf. Which one mog?

 

[Deleted member 1100]

The aesthetic one will have more success with 16-25yo women, the buff one with older women. It's how it goes

 

[Zygos4Life]

The one with face

 

[Ruby]

the ripped dude mogs

 

[Deleted member 2846]

the first guy.

 

[Pietrosiek]

The one with face

We asume they have same face

The aesthetic one will have more success with 16-25yo women, the buff one with older women. It's how it goes

Yeah but i Wonder if smaller guy look like a child compared to bigger guy

 

[Deleted member 2486]

the bigger one mogs if they're both sub 10% bf

if they're both slightly higher bf the aesthetic one mogs

 

[Pietrosiek]

the bigger one mogs if they're both sub 10% bf

if they're both slightly higher bf the aesthetic one mogs

So having strongman genetics mogs bb genetics?

 

[Deleted member 2486]

So having strongman genetics mogs bb genetics?

its all relative

if they both get to competition level of leanness/dryness the bigger guy will look better out of the 2

if they're normal bf, but not fat, like 12-14% bf the aesthetic one will mog cuz his proportions carry him at higher bf% while the one with worse proportions get destroyed at higher bf%

a lot of bodybuilders have shit ratios btw, they just work through with it with steroids and decades of work

 

[Deleted member 3299]

I would rather be bigger and muscular but aesthetic physique is more successful with 18-25yr olds unless you have huge dick and very tall/big frame then just run huge ogre game

 

[Deleted member 2846]

I would rather be bigger and muscular but aesthetic physique is more successful with 18-25yr olds unless you have huge dick and very tall/big frame then just run huge ogre game

projection lmao but yeah

 

[Deleted member 3299]

projection lmao but yeah

i have slightly above average dick and avg height is 6ft so im not that tall but yes ur right about projection lol

 

[Deleted member 2846]

i have slightly above average dick and avg height is 6ft so im not that tall but yes ur right about projection lol

average is 5.2x4.5 btw

 

[Deleted member 2486]

average is 5.2x4.5 btw

probably somewhat bigger

im pretty skeptical about these "averages". its usually somewhat bigger than they write down, same with height etc.

 

[Deleted member 3299]

average is 5.2x4.5 btw

Nope probably like 7 inches and 5.5 inch girth no way 5.2x4.5

 

[Deleted member 2846]

probably somewhat bigger

im pretty skeptical about these "averages". its usually somewhat bigger than they write down, same with height etc.

seems about average tbh. are u saying it’s probably smaller

Nope probably like 7 inches and 5.5 inch girth no way 5.2x4.5

ur delusional tbh. a lot of porn stars aren’t even that big. it’s all camera angles man.

7x5.5 is legit 98th percentile.

 

[Deleted member 1100]

average is 5.2x4.5 btw

no one packing a sub 5.5in penis is considered a man by women, they can't enter in the calculation. The average penis size is somewhere between 6.5-7in

 

[Deleted member 3299]

seems about average tbh. are u saying it’s probably smaller

ur delusional tbh. a lot of porn stars aren’t even that big. it’s all camera angles man.

7x5.5 is legit 98th percentile.

How to calculate percentile?

no one packing a sub 5.5in penis is considered a man by women, they can't enter in the calculation. The average penis size is somewhere between 6.5-7in

I would have 99 percentile if average was 5.2 inch no way that is true

 

[Pietrosiek]

So Mariusz Pudzianowski mogs David Laid? Just body

 

[haircutcel]

probably somewhat bigger

im pretty skeptical about these "averages". its usually somewhat bigger than they write down, same with height etc.

self sampling bias means that people that participate in penis size studies are probably gonna have bigger dicks
so if anything the average is too big
no one is forcing curries and dicklets to participate
also, micropenis is a medical condition so they can’t participate in studies, but monster cocks can

 

[Pietrosiek]

self sampling bias means that people that participate in penis size studies are probably gonna have bigger dicks
so it anything the average is too big
no one is forcing curries and dicklets to participate
also, micropenis is a medical condition so they can’t participate in studies, but monster cocks can

Below 6in is non existing cock. Below 5.5 girth is pencil cock

 

[haircutcel]

Below 6in is non existing cock. Below 5.5 girth is pencil cock

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

as long as the smaller one still looks muscular in clothes, he wins

 

[Deleted member 2486]

So Mariusz Pudzianowski mogs David Laid? Just body
View attachment 151200
View attachment 151201

you didnt understand what i was saying whatsoever. its not just "body". too simplified. you have BODYFAT and LEAN MUSCLE.

people with different proportions look better at different combination BODYFAT and LEAN MUSCLE

lets say someone who has overall very big ribcage, wide shoulder BUT wide hips - > this person needs to go very low bf% to remove all fat around waist/stomach etc. and then he'll look insane

now lets take someone who has very small waist and good shoulder to waist ratio, BUT his overall frame is small, its just his proportions are good - > THIS person may actually look better at higher bf% because getting higher bf% won't hurt his proportions too much and he can compensate for the lack of overall frame size without killing his aesthetics (david laid is this category btw, his actual frame isnt that big, his proportions are just insane. he said in videos that he has like 10-12% bodyfat)

some other people with same bodyfat but worse proportions would look dogshit

its not just "body", its all way more complicated shit

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

you didnt understand what i was saying whatsoever. its not just "body". too simplified. you have BODYFAT and LEAN MUSCLE.

people with different proportions look better at different combination BODYFAT and LEAN MUSCLE

lets say someone who has overall very big ribcage, wide shoulder BUT wide hips - > this person needs to go very low bf% to remove all fat around waist/stomach etc. and then he'll look insane

now lets take someone who has very small waist and good shoulder to waist ratio, BUT his overall frame is small, its just his proportions are good - > THIS person may actually look better at higher bf% because getting higher bf% won't hurt his proportions too much and he can compensate for the lack of overall frame size without killing his aesthetics (david laid is this category btw, his actual frame isnt that big, his proportions are just insane. he said in videos that he has like 10-12% bodyfat)

some other people with same bodyfat but worse proportions would look dogshit

its not just "body", its all way more complicated shit

dn rd but u have high iq and good reputation so i know u said some good shit

 

[Deleted member 2486]

dn rd but u have high iq and good reputation so i know u said some good shit

thx bro

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

thx bro

lately we have been pushing the lean body game movement well on this forum, people starting to realize gym is a lot more legit than they thought. we doin good boi

 

[Pietrosiek]

now lets take someone who has very small waist and good shoulder to waist ratio, BUT his overall frame is small, its just his proportions are good - > THIS person may actually look better at higher bf% because getting higher bf% won't hurt his proportions too much and he can compensate for the lack of overall frame size without killing his aesthetics (david laid is this category btw, his actual frame isnt that big, his proportions are just insane. he said in videos that he has like 10-12% bodyfat)

That's me tbh. But i mean if Pudzianowski and Laid had same face and height and they would stay next to each other which one foid would choose?

 

[Deleted member 2846]

no one packing a sub 5.5in penis is considered a man by women, they can't enter in the calculation. The average penis size is somewhere between 6.5-7in

no it’s not jesus christ you guys are so delusional. you watch too much porn. you sound like an idiot talking about shit u don’t know.

calcSD - Penis Size Percentile Calculator

A lightweight website made so you can easily view the rarity of specific dick sizes and more.

calcsd.netlify.com

Porn star GIRTH: https://mattersofsize.com/topic/por...urce=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

Idk if it will load but this will debunk every dickpill coper: https://www.tumblr.com/safe-mode?ur...urce=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

@Gorilla

 

[Deleted member 3702]

Mine measure 5.2x4.5 btw

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

That's me tbh. But i mean if Pudzianowski and Laid had same face and height and they would stay next to each other which one foid would choose?

tbh at that point it goes down to preference but id say most foids would choose david

 

[Deleted member 3702]

I have the smaller one, he wins

 

[Deleted member 2486]

lately we have been pushing the lean body game movement well on this forum, people starting to realize gym is a lot more legit than they thought. we doin good boi

like its not even that "face" is not the most important. they for some reason think just because we push gym agenda we don't understand face > everything. its rather they think they can escape being a gymcel just by getting a lower third implant.

eventually they will all understand they'll have to become gymcel

That's me tbh. But i mean if Pudzianowski and Laid had same face and height and they would stay next to each other which one foid would choose?

they would choose the one with better face, aka laid

 

[ZyzzReincarnate]

like its not even that "face" is not the most important. they for some reason just because we push gym agenda we don't understand face > everything. its rather they think they can escape being a gymcel just by getting a lower third implant.

eventually they will all understand they'll have to become gymcel

and then you get the retards who are like "how do i build a good physique without gym????" because they hate the negative connotations associated with working out and gymcels they think lifting weights will make them look like this

when in reality it is the quickest way to an aesthetic body, when they just want to achieve it by playing sports or doing pushups or some shit, jfl.

 

[verZYownZZun]

Aesthetic crew all the way

 

[Pietrosiek]

like its not even that "face" is not the most important. they for some reason just because we push gym agenda we don't understand face > everything. its rather they think they can escape being a gymcel just by getting a lower third implant.

eventually they will all understand they'll have to become gymcel

they would choose the one with better face, aka laid

But if they had same face and height? Which body is more attractive

 

[Deleted member 2486]

But if they had same face and height? Which body is more attractive

i just explain it depends on bodyfat

at lower bodyfat (for both) the bigger one is likely more attractive

at somewhat higher bodyfat the more aesthetic one is likely more attractive

so like very low bf bigger > very low bf aesthetic, higher bf aesthetic > higher bf bigger

you can't compare them if they're diff. bodyfat + musculature. they have to be similar level bf% and not too much relative lean mass diff.

i just explain it depends on bodyfat

at lower bodyfat (for both) the bigger one is likely more attractive

at somewhat higher bodyfat the more aesthetic one is likely more attractive

so like very low bf bigger > very low bf aesthetic, higher bf aesthetic > higher bf bigger

you can't compare them if they're diff. bodyfat + musculature. they have to be similar level bf% and not too much relative lean mass diff.

so all in all being aesthetic is better than the other for attracting girls cuz you don't have to maintain that level of bf% to look good when u have aesthetic proportions while having more "robust" build you will have to go low bf% to look aesthetic

 

[Pietrosiek]

i just explain it depends on bodyfat

at lower bodyfat (for both) the bigger one is likely more attractive

at somewhat higher bodyfat the more aesthetic one is likely more attractive

so like very low bf bigger > very low bf aesthetic, higher bf aesthetic > higher bf bigger

you can't compare them if they're diff. bodyfat + musculature. they have to be similar level bf% and not too much relative lean mass diff.

so all in all being aesthetic is better than the other for attracting girls cuz you don't have to maintain that level of bf% to look good when u have aesthetic proportions while having more "robust" build you will have to go low bf% to look aesthetic

Compare them on this photo i posted before

 

[Deleted member 2486]

i just explain it depends on bodyfat

at lower bodyfat (for both) the bigger one is likely more attractive

at somewhat higher bodyfat the more aesthetic one is likely more attractive

so like very low bf bigger > very low bf aesthetic, higher bf aesthetic > higher bf bigger

you can't compare them if they're diff. bodyfat + musculature. they have to be similar level bf% and not too much relative lean mass diff.

so all in all being aesthetic is better than the other for attracting girls cuz you don't have to maintain that level of bf% to look good when u have aesthetic proportions while having more "robust" build you will have to go low bf% to look aesthetic

but in general sense having larger "anything" is pretty much almost better. so you want bigger ribcage, overall skeleton etc. but if your proportions are fucked, its a lot harder to be aesthetic

Compare them on this photo i posted before

okay just looking at these 2 pictures (they have different bodyfat, lean mass, so comparison doesnt make sense if u want to compare genetics, but whatever, lets do it)

if they have same face, same height

and you only see both in t-shirt, maybe even hoodie. the bigger guy is obviously better. is this what you want me to say? yes, if all these conditions are met, being bigger is better cuz being bigger in general is a good thing regarding anything

but this doesnt mean its the "better body", cuz again, its way more complicated than that