randomvanish
České srdce, otevřené všem!
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2020
- Posts
- 13,117
- Reputation
- 16,853
Obviously bonesmashing cope for aesthetic changes. You cannot make aesthetically pleasing bigger bones by hitting yourself, like a fucking 3d printing machine. So, leave this cope.
However; bones DO change after increased stress level (weight lifting/consisting impacts, etc.) by getting more dense. So, your bones don't have to be particularly bigger, it needs to be firmer to adapt.
Look at this microscoping pic;
Osteoporotic bone is weaker mainly because of more porous structure in it.
Therefore, to strengthen the bones I'm thinking about bonesmashing after complete healing from bimax (like 8~12months later)
Why you would need to strengthen facial bones?;
So, to make your bones thickers, more dense; especially on thinner advanced parts, you can benefit from bonesmashing.
Sources :
However; bones DO change after increased stress level (weight lifting/consisting impacts, etc.) by getting more dense. So, your bones don't have to be particularly bigger, it needs to be firmer to adapt.
Look at this microscoping pic;
Osteoporotic bone is weaker mainly because of more porous structure in it.
Therefore, to strengthen the bones I'm thinking about bonesmashing after complete healing from bimax (like 8~12months later)
Why you would need to strengthen facial bones?;
Studies on assault have shown that not only is the face targeted the most, it also often takes the most damage. A study published in 1990 in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, and completed in the United Kingdom, found that 83 percent of all fractures sustained during an assault were facial fractures.
Study :
"Men's faces look different from women's because their ancestors evolved to survive being punched during fights, a new study suggests.
University of Utah researchers David Carrier and Michael Morgan make that argument based on a study that looked at:
"
- The skulls of early hominins — human relatives — called australopiths that lived around four million years ago.
- The injuries of modern humans who show up in the hospital emergency room after a fight.
Even the facial structure of modern humans lends some support to this theory. In their study, Carrier and Morgan pointed to experiments where people were shown images of male faces. In the experiments, the participants consistently rated the more masculine-looking faces as more formidable. In another experiment, more masculine facial features also correlated with stronger grip strength. Studies have also found that facial structure can predict aggression — men with more robust facial bones showed a correlation with higher levels of violence.
This "protective buttressing" hypothesis builds on earlier work from Carrier and Morgan that also suggests human anatomy is the product of early violence. In a study published in 2012 in the Journal of Experimental Biology, they argued that human hands evolved to better form fists as a means for combat.
So, to make your bones thickers, more dense; especially on thinner advanced parts, you can benefit from bonesmashing.
Sources :
Human Face Evolved to Withstand Punches
Human faces look the way they do today because our ancestors fought a lot, according to a new theory bolstered by an analysis of our skull bones. Continue reading →
www.seeker.com
Facing a Violent Past - UNews Archive
What contributed to the evolution of faces in the ape-like ancestors of humans? The prehistoric version of a bar fight—over women, resources and other slug-worthy disagreements, new research from the University of Utah scheduled for publication in the journal Biological Reviews on June 9 suggests.
archive.unews.utah.edu
A Comparison of Bone Mineral Density in Amateur Male Boxers and Active Non-boxers - PubMed
To examine the site-specific osteogenic effect of upper limb impact-loading activity we compared the forearm and arm bone mineral density (BMD) of male boxers to that of active controls. A cross-sectional study was performed with 30 amateur male boxers (aged 18-44 years) and 32 age-matched...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Muscle mass and bone mineral indices: does the normalized bone mineral content differ with age? - PubMed
The age-related differences in BMC were found to be independent of the ageing of SM mass in the arm and trunk region. However, differences in BMC measures of the leg and whole body were found to correspond to age-related decline of SM mass in postmenopausal women.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
[Modification of bone quality by extreme physical stress. Bone density measurements in high-performance athletes using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry] - PubMed
The treatment of osteoporosis is still controversial. Rehabilitation programs which stress strengthening exercises as well as impact loading activities increase the bone mass. On the other side activity level early in life has not been proven to correlate with increased bone mineral content...
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Last edited: