Bonesmashing works. Should I take it a step further?

swaggerdoodle

swaggerdoodle

Silver
Joined
Dec 18, 2023
Posts
535
Reputation
463
Been bonesmashing my brow ridge. Ts actually works. Should I move on to my infras cuz I have eyebags since their recessed
IMG 8255
IMG 8251

2nd photo was taken just now. Been bonesmashing for only 2 days. The first photo was taken less than a week ago
 
Idk why it formatted like that and I’m too lazy to fix it
 
sorry to tell u but its probably just inflammation

bones (specifically the FACIAL bones NOT the bones in ur legs or arms) will NOT grow from u randomly punching them and it can actually have the opposite effect

the "growth" anyone has seen from bonesmashing is most likely scar tissue and not real bone
 
  • +1
Reactions: judif3r and Loruki
sorry to tell u but its probably just inflammation

bones (specifically the FACIAL bones NOT the bones in ur legs or arms) will NOT grow from u randomly punching them and it can actually have the opposite effect

the "growth" anyone has seen from bonesmashing is most likely scar tissue and not real bone
you're a dirty nigger (idk if this information is true or not I'm just trolling)
 
sorry to tell u but its probably just inflammation

bones (specifically the FACIAL bones NOT the bones in ur legs or arms) will NOT grow from u randomly punching them and it can actually have the opposite effect

the "growth" anyone has seen from bonesmashing is most likely scar tissue and not real bone
ive been playing rugby for some time now and i get some natural "bonesmashing". how do i tell if its scar tissue or real bone? my cheekbone/zygo and brow bones on the right side of my face (i hit on this side more) feel much thicker and harder than the left side.
 
  • +1
Reactions: swaggerdoodle
Yes and no.
According to wolffs law, applying 100N (~22 lbs) over 1 cm² might reach a remodeling threshold, as seen in tennis athletes, Orthodonic procedures used to move teeth, etc.
However the potential bone and tissue damage wouldn't be worth the potential gains.
 
  • +1
Reactions: deformed subhuman and dnrwarrior11
how do i tell if its scar tissue or real bone?
i had done it for some time, u can tell if its scar tissue by feeling around itll just feel like the skin is thicker and the texture will be a bit less smooth due to the loss of collagen and from hitting and it leaving scars obviously
my cheekbone/zygo and brow bones on the right side of my face (i hit on this side more) feel much thicker and harder than the left side.
u could just be asymmetrical

but ur bones can technically get a bit denser, but they wont grow outwards in the way u want them to to reach ur goal of enhancing ur appearance
 
  • +1
Reactions: bigmike25
sorry to tell u but its probably just inflammation

bones (specifically the FACIAL bones NOT the bones in ur legs or arms) will NOT grow from u randomly punching them and it can actually have the opposite effect

the "growth" anyone has seen from bonesmashing is most likely scar tissue and not real bone
mate the bones in the skull (trabecular mainly) actually grows faster and is more responsive to mechanical trauma than cortical-bound bone in the long bones (such as the tibia). look up research papers on it
 
The real issue with bonesmashing is that you're applying force to a highly vulnerable area of your face and could potentially affect your sensory organs or cognitive abilities. It's not like your arms or your jaw that are fully composed of muscles tendon and bone. But the theory still works the exact same so yes it works.
 
mate the bones in the skull (trabecular mainly) actually grows faster and is more responsive to mechanical trauma than cortical-bound bone in the long bones (such as the tibia). look up research papers on it
the skull is mainly made of cortical bone, thats all i need to say
 
the skull is mainly made of cortical bone, thats all i need to say
1741491074175
there's a thin layer of cortical bone on all bones its just that its much thinner on the orbitals and other bonesmashed places compared to the legs.
 
View attachment 3550163 there's a thin layer of cortical bone on all bones its just that its much thinner on the orbitals and other bonesmashed places compared to the legs.
wdym

theres a thin layer of trabecular bone, with the skull being mainly made of cortical bone is that what u mean? i think ur getting something mixed up not too sure
 
wdym

theres a thin layer of trabecular bone, with the skull being mainly made of cortical bone is that what u mean? i think ur getting something mixed up not too sure
trabecular is the spongy material inside bones you can see it on the picture
white solid layer on top is cortical

since trabecular has better blood flow and is weaker, it responds more quickly and to a higher degree against mechanical loading than cortical bone.

for the skull there's less cortical bone and more trabecular compared to the legs, so adaptation theoretically should be faster.

but, as you said they probably won't grow outwards or at least not perfectly in the way we want. and bonesmashing carries risks of damaging nerves blood vessels vision among other stuff.
 
  • +1
Reactions: dnrwarrior11 and kevinwang19991@gmai
trabecular is the spongy material inside bones you can see it on the picture
white solid layer on top is cortical
yes i know the difference lol
since trabecular has better blood flow and is weaker, it responds more quickly and to a higher degree against mechanical loading than cortical bone.
but its also below the cortical bone, so u would have to be hit in a way that would also penetrate (pause) the trabeculae below the cortical bone, but as far as i know, wouldnt "microfractures" be counter productive or just be a waste of time? instead osteoblast production would just need to be increased to add new bone correct? as in the osteoblasts that were produced to that specific area would go to healing the microfractures, rather than actually adding new bone

not sure if this is correct, just basing it off my analogy on it
for the skull there's less cortical bone and more trabecular compared to the legs, so adaptation theoretically should be faster.
well although this is true, u can apply more force to the legs rather than ur facial bones
 
  • +1
Reactions: Megfish21

Similar threads

swaggerdoodle
Replies
1
Views
100
MulattoMTN
MulattoMTN
Qlo
Replies
32
Views
579
AscensionMan98
A
beance1
Replies
8
Views
698
NoaA99
N
rookielooxmax
Replies
95
Views
1K
sellatine
sellatine
I_blame_height
Replies
4
Views
149
I_blame_height
I_blame_height

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top