6ft4
Juggernaut Genes Possessor
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2019
- Posts
- 9,532
- Reputation
- 23,654
In primary school the marital status of all of the kids parents was well known
The only kids who's parents weren't together were the ones that lived in council estates and were legit low IQ with learning difficulties
These kids seemed destined to be fuckups. One guy from my class is in jail now for killing a girl while driving recklessly. At my 12th birthday party my sister said he was the most annoying child she ever met because he was constantly complaining
Another guy I heard got a girl pregnant and almost died from excessive drug when he was 18. I don't know what he's doing now but his life seemed to be on poor path
Another guy I was friends with in primary school came to my house once and he tried to bring a cars+topless women mag and my mother took it from him jfl.
My parents wouldn't let me go to his house which was probably a good idea in hindsight. I don't know what he's doing now but when I last seen him aged 13 he looked like a fat druggy
If you ignore the economic factors that put kids raised by single mothers at a disadvantage, how much of their failures are just due to them inheriting genes from low IQ, low class, impulsive parents? If these kids were adopted at birth and raised in a 2 parent household with an average income. How much less likely would they be to fail.
Similarly, if all of the kids in my class who were raised by both parents had their father leave their life at birth, how much worse would they do?
My mother is a nutcase so if my father wasn't involved I think it could have led to me leaving home at 17 and erasing her from my life
I wonder if something like this would've led to my destruction where I start getting neck tats and doing porn vids because I have nobody to maintain a good image for or would it have been a burden lifted off me and allowing me to go on and succeed.
Lets say you take a girl who's average in all metrics and she gets impregnated by a guy with top tier genes in terms of looks, height, IQ, people skills.
The child turns out to be a boy and the mother gets no involvement from the father (financial or otherwise) would this boy turn out better than a boy raised by 2 parents that are average across the board?
The question I'm getting to is, does a boy who has genes from a Chad father but has no father involved in his life, do better than average genes boy with 2 parents involved
If the Chad father genes boy does better on average because he has the looks and IQ to overcome his circumstances and has a much greater ceiling for potential success, then this would mean that a handful of Chads impregnating every girl in the city but having no influence on the childs life would mean we evolve quicker as a species.
If men could sign away their right to financially support their children in exchange for zero right to see the child ever again. Chad would be absolutely unstoppable
The only kids who's parents weren't together were the ones that lived in council estates and were legit low IQ with learning difficulties
These kids seemed destined to be fuckups. One guy from my class is in jail now for killing a girl while driving recklessly. At my 12th birthday party my sister said he was the most annoying child she ever met because he was constantly complaining
Another guy I heard got a girl pregnant and almost died from excessive drug when he was 18. I don't know what he's doing now but his life seemed to be on poor path
Another guy I was friends with in primary school came to my house once and he tried to bring a cars+topless women mag and my mother took it from him jfl.
My parents wouldn't let me go to his house which was probably a good idea in hindsight. I don't know what he's doing now but when I last seen him aged 13 he looked like a fat druggy
If you ignore the economic factors that put kids raised by single mothers at a disadvantage, how much of their failures are just due to them inheriting genes from low IQ, low class, impulsive parents? If these kids were adopted at birth and raised in a 2 parent household with an average income. How much less likely would they be to fail.
Similarly, if all of the kids in my class who were raised by both parents had their father leave their life at birth, how much worse would they do?
My mother is a nutcase so if my father wasn't involved I think it could have led to me leaving home at 17 and erasing her from my life
I wonder if something like this would've led to my destruction where I start getting neck tats and doing porn vids because I have nobody to maintain a good image for or would it have been a burden lifted off me and allowing me to go on and succeed.
Lets say you take a girl who's average in all metrics and she gets impregnated by a guy with top tier genes in terms of looks, height, IQ, people skills.
The child turns out to be a boy and the mother gets no involvement from the father (financial or otherwise) would this boy turn out better than a boy raised by 2 parents that are average across the board?
The question I'm getting to is, does a boy who has genes from a Chad father but has no father involved in his life, do better than average genes boy with 2 parents involved
If the Chad father genes boy does better on average because he has the looks and IQ to overcome his circumstances and has a much greater ceiling for potential success, then this would mean that a handful of Chads impregnating every girl in the city but having no influence on the childs life would mean we evolve quicker as a species.
If men could sign away their right to financially support their children in exchange for zero right to see the child ever again. Chad would be absolutely unstoppable
Last edited:
I don't think I'm some high IQ faggot - maybe compared to all the greycels here. Just a genuine question
