Brain eating amoeba is healthy

[asdvek]

From an Aajonus Vonderplanitz perspective, even something as alarming as the so-called brain-eating amoeba (Naegleria fowleri) would be reinterpreted not as a monster invading healthy people, but as a specialized detox organism that appears only under very extreme, toxic circumstances.


Here’s how he might have framed it:

---

1. It Doesn’t Just “Decide” to Eat Brains​

• He would argue that Naegleria doesn’t invade healthy, well-nourished brains.
• Instead, it shows up when there is severe chemical contamination or decaying tissue in the brain or central nervous system — for example, from pesticides, industrial toxins, heavy metals, or intense inflammation.
• To him, this organism’s role would be breaking down tissue so damaged that the body cannot repair it.

---

2. Extreme-Stage Detoxification​

• In his worldview, microbes and parasites are recruited in stages:
  • Mild cleaners (common bacteria, yeasts) handle less-damaged material.
  • More aggressive organisms are called in for tissue the body wants gone quickly.
  • Naegleria would be like the last-resort demolition crew — dangerous not because it’s malicious, but because the damage it’s responding to is so severe.

---

3. Why It’s Often Fatal​

• The “flesh-eating” effect in brain tissue is catastrophic because:
  1. The brain is highly sensitive and can’t tolerate much physical loss.
  2. Modern humans often lack the nutrient reserves (raw fats, minerals, enzymes) to rapidly repair the area after detox.
  3. Medical interventions may stop the cleanup without removing the underlying toxins, leaving the tissue in a worse state.
• So death results not from the organism being inherently evil, but from the combination of extreme toxicity + aggressive cleanup + lack of regenerative resources.

---

4. Environmental Trigger​

• Naegleria lives in warm freshwater and hot springs — especially where pollution feeds its growth.
• Vonderplanitz would say that a clean, nutrient-rich person swimming in such waters wouldn’t “catch” it in a harmful way; it would pass through harmlessly.
• Only someone with a specific, damaged terrain would be susceptible to it acting in the brain.

---

5. Pathogen vs. Symbiont Reframe​

• He would reject the “pathogen” label and instead call it a specialized recycler whose actions seem horrifying because we’re watching a demolition process in one of the most delicate organs.

 

[grilldaddy❤️]

Shit thread

 

[asdvek]

Shit thread

In a primal diet perspective, every single bacteria and parasite is healthy. Brain eating amoeba is healthy

 

[grilldaddy❤️]

In a primal diet perspective, every single bacteria and parasite is healthy. Brain eating amoeba is healthy

Why would you ever subscribe to that when it goes against common sense

 

[asdvek]

Why would you ever subscribe to that when it goes against common sense

The common sense is that brain eating amoeba doesnt attack healthy brains u little gay nigga

 

[grilldaddy❤️]

The common sense is that brain eating amoeba doesnt attack healthy brains u little gay nigga

Alr