T
the_bubble_dox
Iron
- Joined
- Jan 30, 2024
- Posts
- 211
- Reputation
- 175
I was reading through studies on reproductive fitness (how likely someone is to reproduce), and discovered that autistic men had a lower reproductive fitness than ugly men.
The studies tracked the percent chance that autistic men, and men with low facial attractiveness had of reproducing. The average autistic male had a reproductive fitness of .24, meaning they were 76% less likely to reproduce than the average man. Meanwhile, the bottom 10% of men had a reproductive fitness of .4-.6, meaning they were roughly 40-60% less likely to reproduce. And here's the most brutal part,
Autistic men are less likely to reproduce than men in the bottom 5% of facial attractiveness
The bottom 5% of men had a reproductive fitness of .3-.5, meaning they were 50-70% less likely to reproduce, compared to autistic men's .24 reproductive fitness. This means that the bottom 5% of facially attractive men mog the average autist with average looks.
It's insane how much of a failo autism is. According to these studies, being autistic automatically makes you worse than a sub5.
The studies:
jamanetwork.com
The studies tracked the percent chance that autistic men, and men with low facial attractiveness had of reproducing. The average autistic male had a reproductive fitness of .24, meaning they were 76% less likely to reproduce than the average man. Meanwhile, the bottom 10% of men had a reproductive fitness of .4-.6, meaning they were roughly 40-60% less likely to reproduce. And here's the most brutal part,
Autistic men are less likely to reproduce than men in the bottom 5% of facial attractiveness
The bottom 5% of men had a reproductive fitness of .3-.5, meaning they were 50-70% less likely to reproduce, compared to autistic men's .24 reproductive fitness. This means that the bottom 5% of facially attractive men mog the average autist with average looks.
It's insane how much of a failo autism is. According to these studies, being autistic automatically makes you worse than a sub5.
The studies:
