Brutal MidfaceRatio Pill.. Once Again..

NarcyChadlite

NarcyChadlite

.
Joined
Jul 5, 2020
Posts
3,383
Reputation
9,047
Brought to you by my MSPaint Skills: u mirin?
1607177425845

Original(~.9 ratio) : Morph(~1.0 ratio)
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
  • Love it
Reactions: randomvanish, MentalistKebab, vvshredded and 4 others
Actually not THAT bad.

If anything this proves that a long midface which is not caused by downward growth isn't a big deal unless it's insanely long (usually downward growth results in this).
 
  • +1
Reactions: curryslayerordeath, Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 9344 and 4 others
Thank you Narcy for all the research work you are doing for us. May Christmas Dad give you a giftcard for surgeons.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 10679, Ocelot and 1 other person
Looks literally the exact same
 
  • Hmm...
  • JFL
Reactions: here, Deleted member 10679, NarcyChadlite and 1 other person
1607176600263
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Ocelot and NarcyChadlite
long midface looks quirky to me and not ugly
 
  • +1
Reactions: NarcyChadlite
Actually not THAT bad.

If anything this proves that a long midface which is not caused by downward growth isn't a big deal unless it's insanely long (usually downward growth results in this).

Yup.. the only problem is that a slightly long midface needs to be compensated with a matching mandible, which becomes harder to do b/c to achieve an angular aesthetic jaw, the ramus length needs to be insane. This guy pretty much has everything down except his midface.... and crazy how just a few mms still had a huge change on a model tier face.

I'm indeed mirin

1607176731931


Thank you Narcy for all the research work you are doing for us. May Christmas Dad give you a giftcard for surgeons.

Maybe one day i can research a way to finally make you human, mon ami
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: MD_Hopeful69, MentalistKebab, Deleted member 10679 and 1 other person
looks good in both

your point?
 
I got .97-.98 ratio for the morph, which I consider in the ideal range.

.97:
0970966C 7743 4C9D 8A57 AF0E980B3CC6

1.0:

0B361C29 72D5 433C 850F 36EF4C110911

I think 1.0 looks a bit neotonous compared to .97, but both are definitely an improvement from the original.
 
  • +1
Reactions: bimaximum
Once you go above 1.0 is when a compact midface becomes a failo in my opinion (this is 1.05):

9FA44E78 24AA 440E B540 B4D0BE9CE5A1

Looks way less masculine than .97:

295D7C31 C040 475E 9F28 31B0DD291094
 
  • +1
Reactions: NarcyChadlite
Long midface is not over if its within normal range and has good ipd imo
 
His face is tilted down which distorts it and is why it is longer, if it was neutral he would probably be close to it 1.0 which is why it doesn’t look that long. Our brain realize they are tilting down and adjust.
 

Similar threads

25thBaam
Replies
6
Views
484
ezio6
ezio6
.zonic
Replies
20
Views
341
slush
slush
DarkAscender
Replies
61
Views
2K
Godtis
Godtis
Atakan
Replies
3
Views
195
sirmimbing
sirmimbing
Despicable
Replies
25
Views
464
Aviddegree40571
Aviddegree40571

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top