By Chance, Not by Law

Bars

Bars

DNR.
Joined
Jul 1, 2024
Posts
1,062
Reputation
1,584
Part 1 - https://looksmax.org/threads/we-will-never-die.1142896/

If quantum fluctuations in infinite space could create universes, then in an infinite space every possible event, no matter how random or rare, would eventually happen. I recommend you read the first part to get what I'm saying.

i58vQb-6-tpbBweeBvtEnKFY4AV3KcKam9Y4Rciv8RAgqSbei9ZL-CSb1aMpL5awKN9qYP7ymsPW3MZV-h-AKvfmyOqWHRlYwavhoaUUNCv2YzVJPqXdaSDcIEmR3TZnjU_uYZ-QNN508Ei_Pl33y8g3KmgBqjJJ556GB0hUkQBO


Throwing stones an infinite number of times, eventually, by sheer chance, they would align in such a way that they form something as complex and structured as a hut.

1200px-Dingle_beehive_hut.JPG


What we call "the laws of physics" from this point of view may simply be a byproduct of certain random patterns.

What if these so-called laws aren't really laws at all? What if they are nothing more than accidents: temporary, arbitrary regularities formed by the random collisions and fluctuations of particles in the vacuum? In an infinite universe, every possible outcome will eventually materialize. A universe where gravity holds planets together, where particles interact in consistent ways, could simply be one of those countless possible outcomes. Randomness gives birth to what appears to be order, but that order is only a coincidence.

For creatures like us, born into such randomness, these patterns become the basis of reality. We observe, measure, experiment, and find consistency. We invent complex theories, confident that we have discovered the “rules” that govern everything. But what if we simply live in one of the rare corners of the universe where chaos looks like order?

photo-1456154875099-97a3a56074d3


The fact that we observe consistency in the behavior of things (like gravity or electromagnetism) may not be due to rigidly defined laws, but to the fact that we live in a moment when these random fluctuations just happen to settle into regular patterns.

In this view, beings like us observing these “patterns” would try to understand them as consistent laws, because that’s what our limited slice of the universe looks like. These patterns might be statistical anomalies in an infinite randomness.

It’s a disturbing thought.

The fundamental rules we rely on are just random chance...

Then somewhere in the universe, entirely different “laws” may rule, or even that everything we accept as reality may be simply chaos appearing to be in order.

Our universe might be one of many accidents an improbable arrangement of particles that happened to align in a way that created stars, galaxies, and life. And we, as sentient beings, are simply the observers of this anomaly, piecing together rules from a pattern that might not even matter.

Everything we know, everything we think of as solid and immutable, may be a happy accident in an infinite variety of possibilities. Regularity may be no more than a comforting illusion, a brief moment of order in a vast randomness. And those who study it, who try to understand it, are simply trying to make sense of the randomness we have mistaken for something permanent.​

Although it might not be true.

(Cuck normie physicists can't even explain quantum fluctuations properly, and journalists making it mysterious.)
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: finn899, noobs, PlayersGetPlayed and 1 other person
Bacteria evolved into niggers
 
  • JFL
Reactions: slavicpsycho and Bars
Don't make posts like these as a greycel bud
 
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Kaari, PlayersGetPlayed, slavicpsycho and 2 others
Schizo final boss
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: slavicpsycho and Bars
Read (almost) every single word bud, after all we don't know shit about the universe and its laws (or lack of). Probably we never will, certainly not in our time, really weird.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bars
Brutal what a pice of shit I wrote. Gotta rewrite
 

Similar threads

Bars
Replies
21
Views
459
SecularIslamist
SecularIslamist
L
Replies
53
Views
497
ey88
ey88
Ddjfkfkf
Replies
44
Views
620
metacognitivist
metacognitivist
Bars
Replies
11
Views
248
Bars
Bars

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top