Can masseter hypertrophy result in loss of hollow cheeks?

Celexawer

Celexawer

Hedonism is devastating🇵🇰
Joined
Jul 9, 2020
Posts
1,032
Reputation
1,315
Title

@Bewusst @SubhumanCurrycel
 
  • +1
Reactions: SubhumanCurrycel and Jason Voorhees
Yeah
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Celexawer
Usually not, but in some cases it could.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and Celexawer
Unless the Buccinator hypertrophy along with it unlikely.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Celexawer, SubhumanCurrycel and itorroella9
If your masetter insertions are subhuman yea
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, Celexawer and volcelfatcel
a common thing i've seen thick masseter men don't have the hollow cheeks
1623229079856
1623229090094
1623229113910


vs zygos wider than masseters
1623229187241
1623229289196
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees, N1c and Celexawer
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and volcelfatcel
I saw a quoves video on o'pry and he said o pry has less apparent hollow cheeks because of masseter hypertrophy
I don't see the masseter hypertrophy on o'Pry if anything they're extremely low in mass
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
a common thing i've seen thick masseter men don't have the hollow cheeks
View attachment 1171605View attachment 1171606View attachment 1171607

vs zygos wider than masseters
View attachment 1171608View attachment 1171609
Robert Pattinson doesn't have hollow cheeks too but cavill does both have square Faces. I think if you've thick masseter and high cheekbones you won't have hollow cheeks (what I've observed is high cheekbones are not massive compared to low cheekbones, cavill has low cheekbones)
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and volcelfatcel
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
cheek bones are more responsible for hollow cheeks.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
If I contract my masseters my cheeks become more hollow so I think the opposite is the case
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and MSEFM
It could be because it stretched the skin out, thus kinda getting rid of that hollow cheek look, but regardless imo i'd take the masculine masseter look instead of hollow cheek male model look. Having both is where its at though
1623267030452
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
not even close to the same degree o'pry and gandy have it.
ofc not, but they are the best you can possibly get, he still has hollow cheeks
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and volcelfatcel
ofc not, but they are the best you can possibly get, he still has hollow cheeks
i guess if you wanna go that route, his are barely noticeable. Having thinner masseters usually allows that hollow to happen zygos wider than masseters looks more aesthetic imo, but there's some dimorphism with thicker masseters.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees
i guess if you wanna go that route, his are barely noticeable. Having thinner masseters usually allows that hollow to happen zygos wider than masseters looks more aesthetic imo, but there's some dimorphism with thicker masseters.
i think the trm scale is better than psl scale, trm is more based on bones whereas psl is based on aesthetics and usually dimorphism = smv not aesthetic = smv
 
  • +1
Reactions: Jason Voorhees and volcelfatcel

Similar threads

incliner
Replies
10
Views
185
incliner
incliner
Iwanttomogg2
Replies
2
Views
185
ND11
N
Mrinfinityx
Replies
30
Views
681
Tyrant
Tyrant
DamonHx
Replies
9
Views
466
Moggedbyevery1
Moggedbyevery1
thecel
Replies
14
Views
383
swagstar
swagstar

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top