Can someone explain to me difference between low-set, and high-set masseters?

[Soalian]

Even when googling for pics, I' don't seem to be completely able to make a difference between low-set and high-set masseters?

For example, Brad's are low set, right?

Problem with high set masseters, seems to be the concurrent reduction in zygo prominence, which seems to be in direct inverse correlation to masseter size, WHEN MASSETERS ARE HIGH-SET.

What would be good examples for high-set masseters then?

Thanks.

 

[CursedOne]

I cant answer your question but all I can say to this topic due to experience is, that if you have very wide lowset cheekbones like me and you decide to chew, your face gets fucked up.

 

[Soalian]

I cant answer your question but all I can say to this topic due to experience is, that if you have very wide lowset cheekbones like me and you decide to chew, your face gets fucked up.

Did masseter go back to normal size after you stopped chewing? Haye you tried botix injection into masseters as well?

Did your zygos got more prominent?

I've got high-ish, cheekbones (see avi), I'd like to start chewing mastic or falim to give jaw more width, but I guess that would kinda ruin zygo prominecen too.

 

[CursedOne]

Did masseter go back to normal size after you stopped chewing? Haye you tried botix injection into masseters as well?

Did your zygos got more prominent?

I've got high-ish, cheekbones (see avi), I'd like to start chewing mastic or falim to give jaw more width, but I guess that would kinda ruin zygo prominecen too.

I have had 2 botox masseter injection. thanks to god my masseters went down and my zygos are more visible. But in the old days I had more prominence. I plan to get botox injections all 3 months.

 

[Soalian]

I have had 2 botox masseter injection. thanks to god my masseters went down and my zygos are more visible. But in the old days I had more prominence. I plan to get botox injections all 3 months.

Couldn't zygos prominence get enhanced with fillers though?

I'm thinking of having cheekbones/zygos fillers in the near future as well, regardless of the masseter consideration.

 

[CursedOne]

Couldn't zygos prominence get enhanced with fillers though?

I'm thinking of having cheekbones/zygos fillers in the near future as well, regardless of the masseter consideration.

I dont think that will work. fillers on cheekbones arent good anyway

 

[Deleted member 13076]

I cant answer your question but all I can say to this topic due to experience is, that if you have very wide lowset cheekbones like me and you decide to chew, your face gets fucked up.

You mean this?

High set

Low set

 

[Soalian]

You mean this?

High set

Low set

I don't see O'Pry looking better with more prominent masseters though.

 

[Deleted member 13076]

I don't see O'Pry looking better with more prominent masseters though.

 

[CursedOne]

You mean this?

High set

Low set

Im not an expert but opry is a good example of highset cheekbones, I think asians arent good examples of lowset cheekbones because their facial bone structue is different anyway. why zygos are much wider than this asian guys and chewing ruined my face.

 

[Deleted member 9274]

Low set is bigger ramus length and thus the masseters will be bigger. High set less. Also the low set usually bulges more.

 

[Soalian]

You didn't morph his masseters only? And if his masseter shape is too high,it will reduce zygos prominence as well.

 

[Soalian]

Low set is bigger ramus length and thus the masseters will be bigger. High set less. Also the low set usually bulges more.

I meant, specifically in relation to zygo development/prominence.

High-set masseters seem to ruin zygos prominence in most people.

 

[Deleted member 9274]

I meant, specifically in relation to zygo development/prominence.

High-set masseters seem to ruin zygos prominence in most people.

Probably cuz the big masseter give the illusion of more 'room' with the whole hollow cheeks.

 

[Deleted member 13076]

I meant, specifically in relation to zygo development/prominence.

High-set masseters seem to ruin zygos prominence in most people.

I never morphed these they've been around for a while, but you're right. basically what you're saying is if Opry had bigger masseter muscles his face would be more round and flat as he'd have less separation between his cheeks and jaw?

 

[Soalian]

I never morphed these they've been around for a while, but you're right. basically what you're saying is if Opry had bigger masseter muscles his face would be more round and flat as he'd have less separation between his cheeks and jaw?

Yeah that's basically it. I'm trying to find pics online rn to help explain that point.

 

[Deleted member 13076]

Yeah that's basically it. I'm trying to find pics online rn to help explain that point.

?

 

[Soalian]

?

Hmmm yeah I can see, thanks.

 

[Soalian]

I want good, prominent masseters, while not looking more bloated in the process, is that too much to ask for?

 

[Soalian]

?

I saw this pic comparing both types of hollow cheeks, right one still seems to have prominent masseters, simply he also have minimal malar fat, which helps create his look. First type of hollow cheeks would be low cheekbones (left), and second rule of hollow cheeks would be high cheekbones (right) ?

 

[Cain]

Shit morph, now he looks like a fucking pig.

 

[Cain]

There is not such thing as "high-set" and "low-set" masseters, the position of the insertion points of the masseters does not vary, there's literally 0 evidence of it, as far as I know, yet everyone buys into that bullshit theory.

There are just people with long rami and people with short rami, it is all about the underlying skeletal structure, stop the cope.

 

[Soalian]

There is not such thing as "high-set" and "low-set" masseters, the position of the insertion points of the masseters does not vary, there's literally 0 evidence of it, as far as I know, yet everyone buys into that bullshit theory.

There are just people with long rami and people with short rami, it is all about the underlying skeletal structure, stop the cope.

I'd just like to try to make sense, of why some people gave good zygos, even with prominent masseters, and why others don't.

 

[Cain]

I'd just like to try to make sense, of why some people gave good zygos, even with prominent masseters, and why others don't.

Haven't you thought that maybe it is due to the prominence of the zygos itself?

 

[Soalian]

Haven't you thought that maybe it is due to the prominence of the zygos itself?

Yes, but some people get their masseter size reduced in appearance, whey they start chewing for masseters, while others start chewing, and zygos stay the same