Can someone explain what does infraorbital rim implants with/without "saddle" means

[lasnt]

Title

 

[WanderingBurro]

A fellow .org user can correct me if I'm wrong but the saddle is basically the area that's extending to the side of the skull. The implant on the left does not have saddle and the implant on the right does (these are however not infra orbital implants, just cheek). Saddle usually mogs because it adds more harmony to the result and without the sufficient projection on the side that naturally comes with a better eye area you can end up coming out squint maxxed. (which you can see with a bunch of Taban's patients, as far as I know he doesn't do saddle though again correct me if I'm wrong)

 

[madcap88]

View attachment 2129818

A fellow .org user can correct me if I'm wrong but the saddle is basically the area that's extending to the side of the skull. The implant on the left does not have saddle and the implant on the right does (these are however not infra orbital implants, just cheek). Saddle usually mogs because it adds more harmony to the result and without the sufficient projection on the side that naturally comes with a better eye area you can end up coming out squint maxxed. (which you can see with a bunch of Taban's patients, as far as I know he doesn't do saddle though again correct me if I'm wrong)

A saddle is actually a region of the implant that fits into the eyesocket. It allows more 'blended' under eye support between the lower lid and below towards malar region. Without it, a dip (hollow) between the areas can be present as well as it helping raise the position of the lowerlid.

Most implant surgeons dont use these in their designs due to risk of blinding the patient

 

[WanderingBurro]

A saddle is actually a region of the implant that fits into the eyesocket. It allows more 'blended' under eye support between the lower lid and below towards malar region. Without it, a dip between the areas can be present as well as it helping raise the position of the lowerlid.

Most implant surgeons dont use these in their designs due to risk of blinding the patient

Oh interesting then, thanks for the explanation

No idea what I was pointing to then

 

[lasnt]

View attachment 2129818

A fellow .org user can correct me if I'm wrong but the saddle is basically the area that's extending to the side of the skull. The implant on the left does not have saddle and the implant on the right does (these are however not infra orbital implants, just cheek). Saddle usually mogs because it adds more harmony to the result and without the sufficient projection on the side that naturally comes with a better eye area you can end up coming out squint maxxed. (which you can see with a bunch of Taban's patients, as far as I know he doesn't do saddle though again correct me if I'm wrong)

If infraorbital implants gets rid of tear trough will it get rid of dark circles or they aren't correlated?

 

[madcap88]

If infraorbital implants gets rid of tear trough will it get rid of dark circles or they aren't correlated?

they can - IF your dark circles are caused by lack of volume / skin thinning

 

[lasnt]

they can - IF your dark circles are caused by lack of volume / skin thinning

What's the other causes of dark circles, is it fixable without implants or filers? Like topical cream, supplements ect..

 

[madcap88]

What's the other causes of dark circles, is it fixable without implants or filers? Like topical cream, supplements ect..

genetics, lack of sleep, vitamin deficiency, loose (not necc. thinning), or sagging skin are some

infraorbital and malar augmentation can help with the last too as well as a bleph. eye surgery depending on the exact case

you would likely need an expert to analyze your eyes and/or face - its not something easy to determine

 

[lasnt]

genetics, lack of sleep, vitamin deficiency, loose (not necc. thinning), or sagging skin are some

infraorbital and malar augmentation can help with the last too as well as a bleph. eye surgery depending on the exact case

you would likely need an expert to analyze your eyes and/or face - its not something easy to determine

Thanks, probably infraorbital-malar implants will fix my issue at least i don't have UEE.

 

[CristianT]

Title

probably pictures explains a lot better than words

 

[lasnt]

probably pictures explains a lot better than words

Cost ? If less than 10k$ im willing to do it even tomorrow

 

[madcap88]

Cost ? If less than 10k$ im willing to do it even tomorrow

if u are in US id go to Dr. Yaremchuk.

you will have to get a CT face scan and design custom implants. that will take at least a month

 

[lasnt]

if u are in US id go to Dr. Yaremchuk.

you will have to get a CT face scan and design custom implants. that will take at least a month

Not in US but does he has results as the pics above and how much cost approximately?

 

[madcap88]

Not in US but does he has results as the pics above and how much cost approximately?

$3k to design and make. probably ~11k for surgery. about 14-15k total

 

[Deleted member 21252]

I got quoted 6,500 to 7,200 by the hsieh guy

 

[Deleted member 27660]

price would be the last thing im worried about with this procedure. tbh I would goto the most expensive doctor in LA to get this done

 

[longjohnmong]

Does Ramieri do this?

Are there any comparisons of w/ saddle vs. w/o saddle?

 

[bobsmith03]

they can - IF your dark circles are caused by lack of volume / skin thinning

does lack of volume mean lack of fat pads? i have like no volume under my eyes, and like in this region

 

[User49]

Makes you a femboy

 

[extremchange628181]

Does Ramieri do this?

Are there any comparisons of w/ saddle vs. w/o saddle?

Yes he does it but not saddled infraorbital implants just infraorbital implants

 

[goatedjordan23]

if u are in US id go to Dr. Yaremchuk.

you will have to get a CT face scan and design custom implants. that will take at least a month

he does the same surgery right? the surgery on his website looked similar but just wanted to make sure it was the same one as the asian guy

 

[madcap88]

he does the same surgery right? the surgery on his website looked similar but just wanted to make sure it was the same one as the asian guy

lot has happened since that comment. Under no circumstances should you go to Dr. Yaremchuk. He has a large tendency to misplace implants, designs are not symmetric, and he may not remember which implant he put / is supposed to put in your face (make a mistake)

 

[goatedjordan23]

lot has happened since that comment. Under no circumstances should you go to Dr. Yaremchuk. He has a large tendency to misplace implants, designs are not symmetric, and he may not remember which implant he put / is supposed to put in your face (make a mistake)

who do you recommend for infraorbital saddle implant then? i think in my case i need it with saddle since i need that projection to fix my negative orbital vector

 

[madcap88]

who do you recommend for infraorbital saddle implant then? i think in my case i need it with saddle since i need that projection to fix my negative orbital vector

No one in USA does saddled

 

[madcap88]

Surely that's cap

Im sure there are, but the only notable implant surgeon that seems to is Eppley - which one shouldnt go to

 

[longjohnmong]

No one in USA does saddled

I think Derek Steinbacher might. He has worked with Giant.

 

[WanderingBurro]

View attachment 2129818

A fellow .org user can correct me if I'm wrong but the saddle is basically the area that's extending to the side of the skull. The implant on the left does not have saddle and the implant on the right does (these are however not infra orbital implants, just cheek). Saddle usually mogs because it adds more harmony to the result and without the sufficient projection on the side that naturally comes with a better eye area you can end up coming out squint maxxed. (which you can see with a bunch of Taban's patients, as far as I know he doesn't do saddle though again correct me if I'm wrong)

For anyone liking my post I was mistaken. Please refer to the post below:

A saddle is actually a region of the implant that fits into the eyesocket. It allows more 'blended' under eye support between the lower lid and below towards malar region. Without it, a dip (hollow) between the areas can be present as well as it helping raise the position of the lowerlid.

Most implant surgeons dont use these in their designs due to risk of blinding the patient

 

[Linoob]

A saddle is actually a region of the implant that fits into the eyesocket. It allows more 'blended' under eye support between the lower lid and below towards malar region. Without it, a dip (hollow) between the areas can be present as well as it helping raise the position of the lowerlid.

Most implant surgeons dont use these in their designs due to risk of blinding the patient

As someone who's had custom PEEK infraorbital rim implants with saddles, this is the correct answer.

 

[Linoob]

View attachment 2129818

A fellow .org user can correct me if I'm wrong but the saddle is basically the area that's extending to the side of the skull. The implant on the left does not have saddle and the implant on the right does (these are however not infra orbital implants, just cheek). Saddle usually mogs because it adds more harmony to the result and without the sufficient projection on the side that naturally comes with a better eye area you can end up coming out squint maxxed. (which you can see with a bunch of Taban's patients, as far as I know he doesn't do saddle though again correct me if I'm wrong)

This is referred to as the anterior zygomatic arch

 

[RoyaleWithCheese]

As someone who's had custom PEEK infraorbital rim implants with saddles, this is the correct answer.

Are you happy with your results?

 

[Linoob]

Are you happy with your results?

Very