Can we have a role for raters

[Blackgymmax]

Bruh too many niggas on this site are legit retarded and rate Based off guys they want to fuck.
This site is legit primitive since 98% of the people are actually clueless on lookism

 

[anthony111553]

i agree raters who based on gut instinct are the best, this is what foids will do and it puts an accurate mesaure of what the strengths are

 

[Blackgymmax]

i agree raters who based on gut instinct are the best, this is what foids will do and it puts an accurate mesaure of what the strengths are

Just be gay theory

 

[anthony111553]

Just be gay theory

are u gay for ratting men? if not then how that be gay

 

[Blackgymmax]

@Looks234 exception
Best gut rater on the site

 

[Blackgymmax]

are u gay for ratting men? if not then how that be gay

My personal sense for guys is cope because I'm a dude
I base shit off what ik girls like

 

[anthony111553]

My personal sense for guys is cope because I'm a dude
I base shit off what ik girls like

i don't use personal taste if i did then i'd rate all blondes low

 

[scrunchables]

So true

 

[Blackgymmax]

So true

View attachment 2804067

Egg skull is ideal

 

[Lebgfinal]

I think you need to accept that in life some people have different opinions.

 

[socialcel]

if only everyone was us high IQ as me

 

[anthony111553]

Egg skull is ideal

brutal

 

[socialcel]

*as

 

[moreroidsmoredates]

With all the respect to you @Blackgymmax…

Seeing your face gives me “i want to beat the shit out of you” urges.

Kind regards,
@moreroidsmoredates

 

[UrGirlsMcm]

I think you need to accept that in life some people have different opinions.

I sent your picture to a big booty black french girl and she said ur cute

 

[Magnum Opus]

Would change nothing, copers will still cope, lol if you think that they'll suddenly mindlessly accept ratings and not start arguments just because a guy with the "Rater" role said it

 

[Lebgfinal]

I sent your picture to a big booty black french girl and she said ur cute

View attachment 2804071

Can you guys stop posting pics of myself to strangers? I don't care what she thinks, stop posting my face everywhere.

 

[Blackgymmax]

With all the respect to you @Blackgymmax…

Seeing your face gives me “i want to beat the shit out of you” urges.

Kind regards,
@moreroidsmoredates

Then you realize I'm double your size and you wake up

 

[moreroidsmoredates]

Then you realize I'm double your size and you wake up

You wish

 

[NarrowBones]

I have got ratings from subhuman to htn to chad, the only rating I trust is the one my mom gave me, a handsome young man.

 

[anthony111553]

Then you realize I'm double your size and you wake up

i height mog u

 

[anthony111553]

I have got ratings from subhuman to htn to chad, the only rating I trust is the one my mom gave me, a handsome young man.

i didn't see anyone rate u subhuman just that u had low appeal

 

[Deleted member 62931]

true rater role giga low IQ all that matters if u are fucking girls who are good looking

 

[NarrowBones]

i didn't see anyone rate u subhuman just that u had low appeal

Plenty of people call me ugly. Used to be 3 comment a day calling me ugly

 

[PsychoDsk]

I have got ratings from subhuman to htn to chad, the only rating I trust is the one my mom gave me, a handsome young man.

then you realise your mom doesn't actually love you, she only loves that one chad kid that she sees at her work everyday. everyday she wishes that was her kid instead of you
brutal

 

[anthony111553]

then you realise your mom doesn't actually love you, she only loves that one chad kid that she sees at her work everyday. everyday she wishes that was her kid instead of you
brutal

hes 6 psl

 

[NarrowBones]

then you realise your mom doesn't actually love you, she only loves that one chad kid that she sees at her work everyday. everyday she wishes that was her kid instead of you
brutal

I seen the people at her work, she works with homeless people all day and drug addicts, they do hollow cheek mog me though

 

[PsychoDsk]

hes 6 psl

haven't seen him tbh

 

[NarrowBones]

hes 6 psl

Im not

 

[anthony111553]

Im not

u got rated that a few times, i disagreed but i was overriden

 

[cytoplasm]

Ratings based on "mathematical models" are pointless. Just observe a face and rage

 

[Blackgymmax]

Ratings based on "mathematical models" are pointless. Just observe a face and rage

Over

u got rated that a few times, i disagreed but i was overriden

He's not 6psl LMAOOOOO

 

[Magnum Opus]

Ratings based on "mathematical models" are pointless. Just observe a face and rage

They're not pointless, but in the current state shouldn't be seen as the holy grail, also what measuring ratios & angles doesnt account for is soft feature shape & obviously coloring

The ideal ranges for ratios & angles used for the models at the moment come from studies with different camera setups, f.e. the ideal ESR range could come from a study that took pictures from 4ft distance with a focal length of 90, the midface ratio range from a study with 6ft distance and focal length of 90 though, which makes it a bit silly as you obviously can't analyze just 1 front pic from someone then, due to the fact that the specific picture will automatically not be standardised with some of the studies from which a few ideal ranges were taken from

Ideally there would be a database of ideal ratios and angles for f.e. 5ft camera distance, focal length of 90, then you'd take a picture of yourself under those conditions, and could be sure that all the measurements in the database of the model even apply to your picture

 

[Blackgymmax]

They're not pointless, but in the current state shouldn't be seen as the holy grail, also what measuring ratios & angles doesnt account for is soft feature shape & obviously coloring

The ideal ranges for ratios & angles used for the models at the moment come from studies with different camera setups, f.e. the ideal ESR range could come from a study that took pictures from 4ft distance with a focal length of 90, the midface ratio range from a study with 6ft distance and focal length of 90 though, which makes it a bit silly as you obviously can't analyze just 1 front pic from someone then, due to the fact that the specific picture will automatically not be standardised with some of the studies from which a few ideal ranges were taken from

Ideally there would be a database of ideal ratios and angles for f.e. 5ft camera distance, focal length of 90, then you'd take a picture of yourself under those conditions, and could be sure that all the measurements in the database of the model even apply to your picture

Agree but a .488 from that distance is cooked unless the camera is super warped

 

[trueceI]

They're not pointless, but in the current state shouldn't be seen as the holy grail, also what measuring ratios & angles doesnt account for is soft feature shape & obviously coloring

The ideal ranges for ratios & angles used for the models at the moment come from studies with different camera setups, f.e. the ideal ESR range could come from a study that took pictures from 4ft distance with a focal length of 90, the midface ratio range from a study with 6ft distance and focal length of 90 though, which makes it a bit silly as you obviously can't analyze just 1 front pic from someone then, due to the fact that the specific picture will automatically not be standardised with some of the studies from which a few ideal ranges were taken from

Ideally there would be a database of ideal ratios and angles for f.e. 5ft camera distance, focal length of 90, then you'd take a picture of yourself under those conditions, and could be sure that all the measurements in the database of the model even apply to your picture

Nah, creatingattractive got his ideal ratios from measuring a bunch of attractive faces and getting a mean etc with pics that have minimal distortion

 

[Magnum Opus]

Agree but a .488 from that distance is cooked unless the camera is super warped

Whose ESR are you referring to with this?

 

[notgraycel245969]

The legend postrd

 

[Magnum Opus]

Nah, creatingattractive got his ideal ratios from measuring a bunch of attractive faces and getting a mean etc with pics that have minimal distortion

Not an ideal approach, how can he be sure that the exact measurements hes analyzing in those faces is ideal in them?
If I say "Today I'll determine the "ideal" midface ratio using this method" and then throw in Ian Somerhalder & Chace Crawford into the pot, who obviously overall are attractive, they will drag down the average range for that measurement. To prevent this the analyzer would already need to know that they do not have ideal MFRs, which is either guesswork or done via reading already existing studies on said ratio

With this approach you don't find out what the ideal midface ratio is, you find out what the average midface ratio for already attractive faces is

 

[Blackgymmax]

Not an ideal approach, how can he be sure that the exact measurements hes analyzing in those faces is ideal in them?
If I say "Today I'll determine the "ideal" midface ratio using this method" and then throw in Ian Somerhalder & Chace Crawford into the pot, who obviously overall are attractive, they will drag down the average range for that measurement. To prevent this the analyzer would already need to know that they do not have ideal MFRs, which is either guesswork or done via reading already existing studies on said ratio

With this approach you don't find out what the ideal midface ratio is, you find out what the average midface ratio for already attractive faces is

I personally made some mods by making morphs w different ratios and surveying 100+ women

 

[mog_me]

Egg skull is ideal

Take the egg skull pill

 

[Blackgymmax]

Not an ideal approach, how can he be sure that the exact measurements hes analyzing in those faces is ideal in them?
If I say "Today I'll determine the "ideal" midface ratio using this method" and then throw in Ian Somerhalder & Chace Crawford into the pot, who obviously overall are attractive, they will drag down the average range for that measurement. To prevent this the analyzer would already need to know that they do not have ideal MFRs, which is either guesswork or done via reading already existing studies on said ratio

With this approach you don't find out what the ideal midface ratio is, you find out what the average midface ratio for already attractive faces is

He's also done morphed surveys to adjust btw

 

[Blackgymmax]

Not an ideal approach, how can he be sure that the exact measurements hes analyzing in those faces is ideal in them?
If I say "Today I'll determine the "ideal" midface ratio using this method" and then throw in Ian Somerhalder & Chace Crawford into the pot, who obviously overall are attractive, they will drag down the average range for that measurement. To prevent this the analyzer would already need to know that they do not have ideal MFRs, which is either guesswork or done via reading already existing studies on said ratio

With this approach you don't find out what the ideal midface ratio is, you find out what the average midface ratio for already attractive faces is

Also ian somers brow tilt isn't ideal

 

[trueceI]

Not an ideal approach, how can he be sure that the exact measurements hes analyzing in those faces is ideal in them?
If I say "Today I'll determine the "ideal" midface ratio using this method" and then throw in Ian Somerhalder & Chace Crawford into the pot, who obviously overall are attractive, they will drag down the average range for that measurement. To prevent this the analyzer would already need to know that they do not have ideal MFRs, which is either guesswork or done via reading already existing studies on said ratio

With this approach you don't find out what the ideal midface ratio is, you find out what the average midface ratio for already attractive faces is

the studies use the same methodology 99% of the time, its just averaged out measurements from models. you wont find any studies on e.g. chin to philtrum, its all just averaged out faces. its the best thing you can do so far as it usually includes extremes of both ends (unless someone picks a cope sample size)

his system doesn't factor in how diff ratios work with eachother either, he bsaically thinks 0.443 esr + 0.91 icd to pfl looks the same as 0.46 esr + 1:1 pfl to icd. applies to mfr + total fwhr and many other ratios.

 

[Blackgymmax]

the studies use the same methodology 99% of the time, its just averaged out measurements from models. you wont find any studies on e.g. chin to philtrum, its all just averaged out faces. its the best thing you can do so far as it usually includes extremes of both ends (unless someone picks a cope sample size)

his system doesn't factor in how diff ratios work with eachother either, he bsaically thinks 0.443 esr + 0.91 icd to pfl looks the same as 0.46 esr + 1:1 pfl to icd. applies to mfr + total fwhr and many other ratios.

You get extra points when you're on the more masculine end of ideal btw. However you cant quantify it. It's not 100% accurate but it's the best we have

 

[St.TikTokcel]

and rate Based off guys they want to fuck.

Especially JBWcopers. Legit 8 out 10 users that write shit like: "Saar, you mog insanely hard", look like vid related

 

[Magnum Opus]

the studies use the same methodology 99% of the time, its just averaged out measurements from models. you wont find any studies on e.g. chin to philtrum, its all just averaged out faces. its the best thing you can do so far as it usually includes extremes of both ends (unless someone picks a cope sample size)

his system doesn't factor in how diff ratios work with eachother either, he bsaically thinks 0.443 esr + 0.91 icd to pfl looks the same as 0.46 esr + 1:1 pfl to icd. applies to mfr + total fwhr and many other ratios.

Whose alt are you?

 

[Blackgymmax]

Whose alt are you?

A good one

 

[Blackgymmax]

JBW is real but should be disregarded while rating, kinda like how height would be

I always add race tax unless asked otherwise because I hate ethnics

 

[sorrowfulsad]

Bruh too many niggas on this site are legit retarded and rate Based off guys they want to fuck.
This site is legit primitive since 98% of the people are actually clueless on lookism

I volunteer myself as a ratet, been rotting here since 6 years and got surgery experience

 

[Blackgymmax]

you have consistently good ratings but they are consistently low, once u learn BGMs rating system it makes sense

like for example strong MTN for u is prob weak htn

Prob
It's pretty hard to tell the difference between the 2
It's like 1 or 2 sub ideal feats