can't decide if I want to become a gymcel or good looking guy

[idkmanimao]

to have an ascention like Clav, you need to have good reactivity right?

 

[HundredManSlayer]

you can have both

 

[dahtry7]

what are you even talking about

 

[idkmanimao]

not trying to take roids and othr compounds that will fuck me up

you can have both

 

[HundredManSlayer]

not trying to take roids and othr compounds that will fuck me up

just jfl if you think you need roids to get a good physique. i've bulked up 35 lbs of lean muscle mass in the past 3 years.

 

[idkmanimao]

just jfl if you think you need roids to get a good physique. i've bulked up 35 lbs of lean muscle mass in the past 3 years.

for face bud, my genetics are good physique wise, iv'e put on 25 LBS in 10 weeks, 17 LBS was muscle

 

[HundredManSlayer]

for face bud, my genetics are good physique wise, iv'e put on 25 LBS in 10 weeks, 17 LBS was muscle

are you on roids right now?

 

[aids]

These two things are not mutually exclusive you tard.
JFL if you think gear will descend you.

 

[idkmanimao]

are you on roids right now?

no, i have high test rn, and just ate lots of food ect

 

[laworg]

Tf r u saying just go to the gym and train it wont negatively impact u

 

[idkmanimao]

These two things are not mutually exclusive you tard.
JFL if you think gear will descend you.

jfl never said it will, did you not read? I said I don't want to take compounds that will fuck me up badly

 

[HundredManSlayer]

no, i have high test rn, and just ate lots of food ect

theres no way in gandy heaven you put on 17 lbs of muscle in 10 weeks, unless your injecting test. no levels of natural test will have you put on that much muscle mass, it's impossible. you're severely overestimating how much lean muscle mass you've put on.

 

[Orthognathic]

to have an ascention like Clav, you need to have good reactivity right?

Why not both?

 

[aids]

jfl never said it will, did you not read? I said I don't want to take compounds that will fuck me up badly

Your thread title implies that if you take gear, you can't be good looking.
You are retarded.
JFL at your IQ, already evident from your question that it was low. Stupid cunt, caging so hard

 

[idkmanimao]

theres no way in gandy heaven you put on 17 lbs of muscle in 10 weeks, unless your injecting test. no levels of natural test will have you put on that much muscle mass, it's impossible. you're severely overestimating how much lean muscle mass you've put on.

I got a dexa scan just before lifting, just got one recently, its accurate, but no i'm not on anything, I swear on my life

 

[idkmanimao]

Your thread title implies that if you take gear, you can't be good looking.
You are retarded.
JFL at your IQ, already evident from your question that it was low. Stupid cunt, caging so hard

I was implying I didn't want to fuck my health up just to ascend, therefore I said "can't decide"

 

[HundredManSlayer]

I got a dexa scan just before lifting, just got one recently, its accurate, but no i'm not on anything, I swear on my life

i severely doubt you put on 17 lbs on muscle mass in 10 weeks, that would be 95 pounds of muscle in one year which is impossible. no amount of gear nor genetics, nothing would get you close to half that. dexa scans can be inaccurate, it counts water weight as lean mass and has a large margin of error.

 

[aids]

i severely doubt you put on 17 lbs on muscle mass in 10 weeks, that would be 95 pounds of muscle in one year which is impossible. no amount of gear nor genetics, nothing would get you close to half that. dexa scans can be inaccurate, it counts water weight as lean mass and has a large margin of error.

Because muscle gain is linear
Yes, he's overestimating, but what a retarded assumption

 

[idkmanimao]

i severely doubt you put on 17 lbs on muscle mass in 10 weeks, that would be 95 pounds of muscle in one year which is impossible. no amount of gear nor genetics, nothing would get you close to half that. dexa scans can be inaccurate, it counts water weight as lean mass and has a large margin of error.

newbie gains, I had just started, ofc its not going to be consistent throughout a year

 

[HundredManSlayer]

Because muscle gain is linear
Yes, he's overestimating, but what a retarded assumption

your right its not linear just did quick retard calculations jfl

 

[Sadist]

just do both theory
suffer for a few months on cycle
only for the cut to be absolutely legendary

сlav is clapped as fuck btw

 

[idkmanimao]

just do both theory
suffer for a few months on cycle
only for the cut to be absolutely legendary

сlav is clapped as fuck btw

yeah alr, but I've heard ppl saying once off cycle, you'll start losing muscle n gains

 

[Sadist]

yeah alr, but I've heard ppl saying once off cycle, you'll start losing muscle n gains

not unless youre on shit like anadrol
a test cycle, for example, will preserve the overwhelming majority of your gains

 

[idkmanimao]

not unless youre on shit like anadrol

alr, can I pm you pics? like to see if I even need it just to confirm? i'm 14, 6'3

 

[Sadist]

alr, can I pm you pics? like to see if I even need it just to confirm? i'm 14, 6'3

oh for fucks sake why could i tell youre 14 straight away
u can pm me pics but expect 0 advice on roids

 

[idkmanimao]

oh for fucks sake why could i tell youre 14 straight away
u can pm me pics but expect 0 advice on roids

alralr

 

[Myth]

I got a dexa scan just before lifting, just got one recently, its accurate, but no i'm not on anything, I swear on my life

Dexa is not accurate

 

[idkmanimao]

Dexa is not accurate

what is then?

 

[Sadist]

Dexa is not accurate

nah bro its accurate truuuuuuust

 

[Myth]

what is then?

Dexa includes water weight in your lean mass. So almost all your newbie gainz are water. Brutal lmao