Capitalism only "works" for the west because of third world slaves...

disillusioned

disillusioned

Fuchsia
Joined
Jan 2, 2019
Posts
11,025
Reputation
32,956
Jfl at right-wing lies about capitalism creating higher standards of living and that the west is proof of this. Higher standards of living for whom? Prior to globalism quality of life for the industrial lower classes in the west was utterly terrible, and literally the only reason this changed is because globalism basically just turned the third world into the new global lower class while westerners (and a few developed nations like Korea/China) become the global middle and upper class.

Fun fact: Only 20% or so of the world population is considered "middle class" or higher. 80+% are dirt poor.

And even then, capitalism sucks so bad that even in the west people are becoming poorer anyway. Capitalism is a lie and a scam. You only get Ipads at affordable prices because Chinese or Indian wage slaves made them for you for a slave wage under horrible conditions. If the third world vanished and the west had to start producing all of it's shit by itself where people are paid good wages and have good working conditions then the pricing of tons of things would go through the roof. Things like Iphones would basically become luxury items.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973, Deleted member 5180, fukmylyf and 3 others
Maybe don’t be born into a 3rd world country bro
 
  • +1
Reactions: Patriot, JMax and Chintuck22
I love this poster man
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973, Deleted member 2748 and ChaddeusPeuterschmit
such bullshit capitalism existed and allowed nations to prosper FAR BEFORE emigrating to a country had third world workers or slaves, or a significant number of them

EG: India having largest GDP 0-1800
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl and ChaddeusPeuterschmit
Jfl at right-wing lies about capitalism creating higher standards of living and that the west is proof of this. Higher standards of living for whom? Prior to globalism quality of life for the industrial lower classes in the west was utterly terrible, and literally the only reason this changed is because globalism basically just turned the third world into the new global lower class while westerners (and a few developed nations like Korea/China) become the global middle and upper class.

Fun fact: Only 20% or so of the world population is considered "middle class" or higher. 80+% are dirt poor.

And even then, capitalism sucks so bad that even in the west people are becoming poorer anyway. Capitalism is a lie and a scam. You only get Ipads at affordable prices because Chinese or Indian wage slaves made them for you for a slave wage under horrible conditions. If the third world vanished and the west had to start producing all of it's shit by itself where people are paid good wages and have good working conditions then the pricing of tons of things would go through the roof. Things like Iphones would basically become luxury items.

1. Globalisation really kicked in after world war II after Bretton Woods failed.
in 150 years, free market capitalism has eradicated poverty in hundreds of millions of people around the world. I do not think you would want the entire Indian and black populations to live in total misery, at palolithic and Neolithic level, dying at the age of 50 because of a mouth infections? Without of free-market capitalism, there would be no industrial revolution, there would be no powerful companies and e-revolutionm there would not be discord, cheap homes and cheap food, the biggest techonoly progress we can observe in the last 100 years. Capitalism has never failed, the biggest progres in technology and standartds of living was when we had free market capitalism up to the 1914, since 1930's people are blaiming capitalism for things capitalism has nothing to do.

Pauperisation of the middle class? Result of constant inflation due to fiat currency and Central Banking systems.
Constant Inflation and lack of finacial stability? Result of fiat currency.
Big prices of medical drugs? Result of action taken by corrupted government instituions.
Super-Hipergamy? Result of "equal payment" anti-free market policy. Females are now "married" to the state.I could go on and on and on...

World population living in extreme poverty
Women taxes vote
Eastern block GDP per capita 1950 1990 dollar value


We live closer to socialism than ever before
Public spending as gdp per capita USA federal government socialism muh neoliberalism
Taxes world socialism muh neoliberalism
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Deleted member 1973, SHARK, fukmylyf and 3 others
@Patriot mirin ur post

it is proven that slaves did not add that much wealth at the end. it was industrial that multiplied western wealth. - "why nations fail"

still global hegemong is legit
 
  • +1
Reactions: Patriot
yes bro lets be a socialist country like china
 
  • +1
Reactions: Blackout.xl
Workers in the 3rd world went from substinence farming and hunger to factory jobs and guaranteed wages. Which will progress to high class office jobs (as we’re seeing in China)

I don’t even like pure free trade either. But this thread reeks of the most smelly horse manure
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973
yes bro lets be a socialist country like china
Well, it depends what does it mean to be "socialist".
As you know China actually has mixed-economy with many areas such as energy or resources under state control. China actually rejected purly socialist model after Mao died. Deng Xiaoping started chinese free market reforms in 1978.
GDP per capita constant 2000 dolars
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973 and Deleted member 4671
Well, it depends what does it mean to be "socialist".
As you know China actually has mixed-economy with many areas such as energy or resources under state control. China actually rejected purly socialist model after Mao died. Deng Xiaoping started chinese free market reforms in 1978.
View attachment 312747
It wouldn't be as rich as it is today without being a mixed economy, but of coarse it is still a shit hole where they eat bats and have censorship everyhwere
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 1973 and Patriot
It wouldn't be as rich as it is today without being a mixed economy, but of coarse it is still a shit hole where they eat bats and have censorship everyhwere
Well, I think that without large failures in the middle 20th century and being open late to world trade (beggining of 80s!) it could be a bit closer to South Korean level.
 

Similar threads

CorinthianLOX
Replies
23
Views
382
Liferuiner
Liferuiner
Sloppyseconds
Replies
19
Views
372
Iraniancel
Iraniancel
enchanted_elixir
Replies
36
Views
2K
Davud.isbarxanli.04
D
Gargantuan
Replies
69
Views
2K
Sven
Sven

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top