Capitalist "liberty" only results in men destroying each other

[Uglybrazilian]

when men are left alone for themselves then the only outcome is the complete destruction of everyone by everyone, not liberty
A free society is a society in which every man has a chance of having the job that he likes, a good house, health and a wife

not a society in which one has to work in mentally damaging jobs, have to spend 15 years paying for a shitty house without any type of health care and dies as incel cause chad steals all women

 

[Deleted member 1476]

based and pilled

 

[Danish_Retard]

housepill is too brutal. I don't want to spend 10 years of my life just afford a place to fucking live. It's fucking slavery.

 

[Deleted member 1476]

housepill is too brutal. I don't want to spend 10 years of my life just afford a place to fucking live. It's fucking slavery.

especially when boomers could buy a house for like £1.99

 

[Matheus]

I smell faggotry and low economic knowledge in this thread

A free society is a society in which every man has a chance of having the job that he likes, a good house, health and a wife

Oh yeah and what’s that called?

not a society in which one has to work in mentally damaging jobs, have to spend 15 years paying for a shitty house without any type of health care and dies as incel cause chad steals all women

Blame the central banks buddy they’re the one manipulating the markets

 

[Uglybrazilian]

I smell faggotry and low economic knowledge in this thread

Oh yeah and what’s that called?

Blame the central banks buddy they’re the one manipulating the markets

its called socialism, except for the wife part but that can be solved

 

[Matheus]

its called socialism, except for the wife part but that can be solved

Imagine being blackpilled and thinking socialism is viable

 

[oatmeal]

Imagine being blackpilled and thinking socialism is viable

what is socialism

 

[Deleted member 2748]

housepill is too brutal. I don't want to spend 10 years of my life just afford a place to fucking live. It's fucking slavery.

same bro. i still have to come to terms with the fact i'll have to slave away for at least 20 years of my life just to have a decent house to live into, meanwhile mid-high class people have a main house, a second house and a vacation house
it's fucking ridiculous, but it is what it is
in this life you either luck out or have to live as a peasant

 

[Uglybrazilian]

Imagine being blackpilled and thinking socialism is viable

inceldom is literally on the rise cause of capitalism
being blackpilled and not being socialist = weird

 

[oatmeal]

Blame the central banks buddy they’re the one manipulating the markets

while I definitely do believe that central banks are a contributor to the issues within capitalism, why do you cast the blame on just them? they are inefficient because the state of capitalism as a system is rigid to reform, so much so that any monetary policy or tariff or restriction is simply either not enough or detrimental to businesses that are unable to compete or working class people.

its why, to me at least, its just a symptom of capitalism right now.

 

[Matheus]

inceldom is literally on the rise cause of capitalism
being blackpilled and not being socialist = weird

Inceldom is on the rise because of the breakage of monogamy and the decadent culture + destruction of patriarchy etc etc. And guess who is financing that? Yeah. I thought it was common knowledge. The only economic factor involved is the fact that in a service economy women can work and be financially independent, and this is the only issue that can be blamed on "capitalism". Besides this is more a cultural issue because capitalism is merely a way to organise the allocation of resources and does not dictate how the workforce should evolve. You're thinking in absolutes where socialism = socialist theory and capitalism = capitalist theory but in practice it doesn't happen like that.

Socialism is the biggest scam (((they))) have ever pulled on us, bolshevik ranks where full of people of the chosen tribe. I can explain to you why socialism doesn't even work on paper and why it's just a gigantic facade but I can't bother rn. Just try to find a socialist nation that doesn't collapsed on itself after decades of terror and oppression of its own population, countless famines, economic disasters, etc. And don't tell me China bc at that point I'll just send you a wikipedia link about economics.

Socialism = gigantic trap and common bluepill tbh. But your utopia will soon be reality with the (((Great reset))).

what is socialism

Abolition of private property, centralisation of power, collectivisation of means of production, allocation of resources by (((central authorities))).

while I definitely do believe that central banks are a contributor to the issues within capitalism, why do you cast the blame on just them? they are inefficient because the state of capitalism as a system is rigid to reform, so much so that any monetary policy or tariff or restriction is simply either not enough or detrimental to businesses that are unable to compete or working class people.

its why, to me at least, its just a symptom of capitalism right now.

I'm not libertarian or a proponent of unbridled capitalism and in fact I'm more of a supporter of free markets than I am of capitalism itself. In fact this a common misconception and the elites are capitalising on it to get rid of capitalism, where in the common mind they equate capitalism with the form of corporatocracy we have now, where the markets aren't free (at all).
Capitalism isn't more rigid to reform than other systems, an economic system is necessarily very hard to change because it's intertwined with everything and has a lot of inertia. Economic systems are only replaced when they fail or the infrastructure supporting them fails, examples : the degenerate late Roman Empire with slave-based economy, middle-ages' feudalism, and now we will have a gigantic crisis where the elites will replace the economic system with a very dystopic variant of socialism. What has been happening since the 1900s is the staged failure of a deviated form of capitalism, and this is a curtain that the elites are pulling over us. They're the one behind all the crises ; since they are so afraid of losing their power, they deliberately crash the system to replace it with one where their control is much more potent. Free market capitalism as a organised economic system is so "rigid" to reform because it has been working so well. But it has the "inconvenient" of making the middle class richer, which threatens the power of the elites, see what I said before.
Free market capitalism in the 1800s and 1900s was extremely profitable and made everyone richer over time, whereas since the 1920s (save for the post war rebuild) the trend was been to have everyone poorer except for the elites who have become immensely rich.

Basically central banks skew the system by manipulating markets and more importantly price signals, which in a normal economy dictate where scarce resources with alternative uses are to be allocated. Free market capitalism assumes that individuals should decide how to interpret price signals and that on a global scale, the allocation will be efficient. Socialism assumes that a central authority should interpret price signals and dictate prices to everybody else. It has never worked in the past and probably never will, with the centralised AI system the elites want to implement to allocate resources.

Example : you sell planks of wood. You, of course, want to sell them for the highest possible benefit.
In free market (capitalism), you try to find the most eager buyer, possibly wait on other offers, take risks, and take your decisions. Ultimately you settle for a price which on average, at a global scale, will be the price of that specific good at market value.
In socialism, the state buys your stuff at a predetermined value (or just takes it in exchange of giving you your other necessaries, etc) and distributes it to those who need it the most. Who does the system know who needs it the most? It doesn't.
In the system we have now, you try to find the most eager buyer, but wait! The government readily prints money to buy your planks at an excellent price, way above market value, or tells you that you can sell them to the first guy you meet (because the gov wants to increase velocity of the money) or that if you sell to that one guy he'll give you a tip. Thus you agree, but the planks do not go to the most eager buyer you can reasonably find, who is also usually the one needing the good the most. That's skewed capitalism.

Also, with central banks, the notions of risk / reward and responsibility / loss is very blurred if not non-existent. Everyone is in debt to the central banks because everyone took insane economic risks knowing the central banks had their back (buying houses, banks lending without sufficient reserves, etc). You can't have a sound economic system where everyone is bluffing and betting more than they can lose.

 

[Deleted member 275]

A free society is a society in which every man has a chance of having the job that he likes, a good house, health and a wife

How would a society like this be possible in a world in which some people are born ugly and others are born good-looking?

Half the male population has 0 chance of obtaining a wife the moment they are born.