chancemaxxing (rant)

acidonmyface

acidonmyface

17/6’2 khhv tccnigger
Joined
Aug 30, 2024
Posts
178
Reputation
186
I see so many people fucking up their life fully willingly just to blame external factors instead of their own will. YOU are the reason for your problems and you can fix them.

I’m so tired of all the cope about how it’s because „my parents didn’t do this” and „it just didn’t work out”. Your own will is the strongest ability you have and you have to stop lying around idly.

Shitposting on org won’t make you attractive, you have to actually put the hundreds of posts of knowledge into use. 70% of this forum isn’t even below sub5 but almost everyone has the „it’s so over” mentality. Those people would rather blame their looks for their problems rather than man up and blame yourself. Obviously looks are the most important factor when it comes to attracting women but they’re not the only one.

Do you really think that if you’re not below the 20th percentile and not below 5’6” there is absolutely no girl that’ll want you? „ouh but chad has it easier than me!” Shut the fuck up nigga, you’re not chad and life isn’t fair.

This cuckoldry and drifting around in the pool of your own misery made with tears by assuming that it’s over when you’re not doing EVERYTHING you can to be more attractive, is retarded.

This doesn’t apply just to looksmaxxing but overall life satisfaction.

If you stay in one place- you will be miserable
If you don’t do anything with your life- you will be miserable

If you don’t put effort into anything- you will be miserable

You don’t get to lie down and rest until you’ve done absolutely everything you can.

If you don’t take risks in your life then it won’t change. Every single day there’re opportunities which you miss out on. You have to stop circle jerking with your own shadow in the comfort zone and instead of bumping your „rate me” post in the offtopic, go out to a mall and hit on some random girls. You’ll get rejected nigga but the pain of failing is better than the pain of not trying. You have to build resilience even if at the cost of failing.

Do the things that you don’t want to do

And if any faggot feels like commenting „but I tried so hard and got nowhere”, gtfo. You either keep trying or stay a spineless pussy and end up roping
 
  • +1
Reactions: ayannn, geeka, isis_Bleach and 8 others
DNR bluepilled nig
 
  • +1
Reactions: nsk4ll
I didn’t read this but you wrote a lot so I’ll give you a thumbs up
 
  • Love it
  • +1
Reactions: ayannn and acidonmyface
I see so many people fucking up their life fully willingly just to blame external factors instead of their own will. YOU are the reason for your problems and you can fix them.

I’m so tired of all the cope about how it’s because „my parents didn’t do this” and „it just didn’t work out”. Your own will is the strongest ability you have and you have to stop lying around idly.

Shitposting on org won’t make you attractive, you have to actually put the hundreds of posts of knowledge into use. 70% of this forum isn’t even below sub5 but almost everyone has the „it’s so over” mentality. Those people would rather blame their looks for their problems rather than man up and blame yourself. Obviously looks are the most important factor when it comes to attracting women but they’re not the only one.

Do you really think that if you’re not below the 20th percentile and not below 5’6” there is absolutely no girl that’ll want you? „ouh but chad has it easier than me!” Shut the fuck up nigga, you’re not chad and life isn’t fair.

This cuckoldry and drifting around in the pool of your own misery made with tears by assuming that it’s over when you’re not doing EVERYTHING you can to be more attractive, is retarded.

This doesn’t apply just to looksmaxxing but overall life satisfaction.

If you stay in one place- you will be miserable
If you don’t do anything with your life- you will be miserable

If you don’t put effort into anything- you will be miserable

You don’t get to lie down and rest until you’ve done absolutely everything you can.

If you don’t take risks in your life then it won’t change. Every single day there’re opportunities which you miss out on. You have to stop circle jerking with your own shadow in the comfort zone and instead of bumping your „rate me” post in the offtopic, go out to a mall and hit on some random girls. You’ll get rejected nigga but the pain of failing is better than the pain of not trying. You have to build resilience even if at the cost of failing.

Do the things that you don’t want to do

And if any faggot feels like commenting „but I tried so hard and got nowhere”, gtfo. You either keep trying or stay a spineless pussy and end up roping
NIGGA IF YOU ARNT 6’3 WHITE AND HTN GO FUCKING ROPE ITS OVER
 
  • JFL
Reactions: geeka and acidonmyface
The truth is some people don't have proper emotional development, it matters a lot more than "just do what you're supposed to do"
 
The truth is some people don't have proper emotional development, it matters a lot more than "just do what you're supposed to do"
I know because I was extremely emotionally immature until 16 and honestly some regret from not taking action back then is still there. That’s exactly why it’s important to preach the mentality of doing the things that you should do. We’re being way too apologetic with the current generation growing up to be losers
 
Dnr

Blackpill is at its core about genetic determinism


U can't change your genes

And quite literally if your parents had fed you proper food as a baby then you would be a lot more developed
 
I see so many people fucking up their life fully willingly just to blame external factors instead of their own will. YOU are the reason for your problems and you can fix them.

I’m so tired of all the cope about how it’s because „my parents didn’t do this” and „it just didn’t work out”. Your own will is the strongest ability you have and you have to stop lying around idly.

Shitposting on org won’t make you attractive, you have to actually put the hundreds of posts of knowledge into use. 70% of this forum isn’t even below sub5 but almost everyone has the „it’s so over” mentality. Those people would rather blame their looks for their problems rather than man up and blame yourself. Obviously looks are the most important factor when it comes to attracting women but they’re not the only one.

Do you really think that if you’re not below the 20th percentile and not below 5’6” there is absolutely no girl that’ll want you? „ouh but chad has it easier than me!” Shut the fuck up nigga, you’re not chad and life isn’t fair.

This cuckoldry and drifting around in the pool of your own misery made with tears by assuming that it’s over when you’re not doing EVERYTHING you can to be more attractive, is retarded.

This doesn’t apply just to looksmaxxing but overall life satisfaction.

If you stay in one place- you will be miserable
If you don’t do anything with your life- you will be miserable

If you don’t put effort into anything- you will be miserable

You don’t get to lie down and rest until you’ve done absolutely everything you can.

If you don’t take risks in your life then it won’t change. Every single day there’re opportunities which you miss out on. You have to stop circle jerking with your own shadow in the comfort zone and instead of bumping your „rate me” post in the offtopic, go out to a mall and hit on some random girls. You’ll get rejected nigga but the pain of failing is better than the pain of not trying. You have to build resilience even if at the cost of failing.

Do the things that you don’t want to do

And if any faggot feels like commenting „but I tried so hard and got nowhere”, gtfo. You either keep trying or stay a spineless pussy and end up roping
sort of true
i agree
mirin :feelshehe:
 
  • Love it
Reactions: acidonmyface
Dnr

Blackpill is at its core about genetic determinism


U can't change your genes

And quite literally if your parents had fed you proper food as a baby then you would be a lot more developed
a lot is determined by genes but if you pin, moneymaxx and get as many surgeries as you can then the chance of you still being unattractive is low

I meant overall life satisfaction doe
 
No.

"you'll get rejected but it will feel better" is just the setup. This means nothing on its own.

Where's the actual action plan for men who have unattractive characteristics or even are just 8/10s who's only option is cold approach?

You can call yourself bluepilled in an ironic manner all you want but this is nothing but circular reasoning with no premises or action plan.
 
I see so many people fucking up their life fully willingly just to blame external factors instead of their own will. YOU are the reason for your problems and you can fix them.

I’m so tired of all the cope about how it’s because „my parents didn’t do this” and „it just didn’t work out”. Your own will is the strongest ability you have and you have to stop lying around idly.

Shitposting on org won’t make you attractive, you have to actually put the hundreds of posts of knowledge into use. 70% of this forum isn’t even below sub5 but almost everyone has the „it’s so over” mentality. Those people would rather blame their looks for their problems rather than man up and blame yourself. Obviously looks are the most important factor when it comes to attracting women but they’re not the only one.

Do you really think that if you’re not below the 20th percentile and not below 5’6” there is absolutely no girl that’ll want you? „ouh but chad has it easier than me!” Shut the fuck up nigga, you’re not chad and life isn’t fair.

This cuckoldry and drifting around in the pool of your own misery made with tears by assuming that it’s over when you’re not doing EVERYTHING you can to be more attractive, is retarded.

This doesn’t apply just to looksmaxxing but overall life satisfaction.

If you stay in one place- you will be miserable
If you don’t do anything with your life- you will be miserable

If you don’t put effort into anything- you will be miserable

You don’t get to lie down and rest until you’ve done absolutely everything you can.

If you don’t take risks in your life then it won’t change. Every single day there’re opportunities which you miss out on. You have to stop circle jerking with your own shadow in the comfort zone and instead of bumping your „rate me” post in the offtopic, go out to a mall and hit on some random girls. You’ll get rejected nigga but the pain of failing is better than the pain of not trying. You have to build resilience even if at the cost of failing.

Do the things that you don’t want to do

And if any faggot feels like commenting „but I tried so hard and got nowhere”, gtfo. You either keep trying or stay a spineless pussy and end up roping
Ur lowkey right the most brutal pill is the mindpill if ur mindset is shit ur life will be shit too
 
  • +1
Reactions: acidonmyface
No.

"you'll get rejected but it will feel better" is just the setup. This means nothing on its own.

Where's the actual action plan for men who have unattractive characteristics or even are just 8/10s who's only option is cold approach?

You can call yourself bluepilled in an ironic manner all you want but this is nothing but circular reasoning with no premises or action plan.
This has no premises or action plan because it’s a mindset, it’s application depends on the situation. It’s definitely not circular reasoning either because I presented a problem, missing out on life, pointed out it’s root, inaction, and a solution, taking action.

„you’ll get rejected but it will feel better” is true by itself as well IF you implement a mindset of not letting it depress you but hopefuel you instead.

Bhai I have nothing against you and I don’t know you but I think you might be one of those copers. This is a second time you’re showing some kind of negative mentality of going against change like when I proposed that I prove to you that a 150% bench isn’t impossible for a natural (to which you didn’t respond)
 
This has no premises or action plan because it’s a mindset, it’s application depends on the situation. It’s definitely not circular reasoning either because I presented a problem, missing out on life, pointed out it’s root, inaction, and a solution, taking action.

„you’ll get rejected but it will feel better” is true by itself as well IF you implement a mindset of not letting it depress you but hopefuel you instead.

Literally it's just circular reasoning because you're saying it because it's true and it's true because you're saying it.

Why have this mindset when it's false and there is 0 argument behind it? You were absolutely insistent on it being your fault and that you should pull yourself up by the bootstraps. Where is that now? Now you're just saying it's a mindset but again there is no reason to believe this is true and there is no reason to believe it will help.

Let me repeat myself; are you capable of going BEYOND just "you will get rejected but it will feel better than the alternative" because if not then what's the point.

Bhai I have nothing against you and I don’t know you but I think you might be one of those copers. This is a second time you’re showing some kind of negative mentality of going against change like when I proposed that I prove to you that a 150% bench isn’t impossible for a natural (to which you didn’t respond)

I responded. You're putting an umbrella of "negative mentality" over someone simply questioning why an 18 YO natural is easily able to do what Hamza struggles to do with roids and another braindead claim. Without this I would have assumed you're a troll but you're 100% serious about this and the bench claim.
 
  • +1
Reactions: HowToBasic
Literally it's just circular reasoning because you're saying it because it's true and it's true because you're saying it.
It might seem like circular reasoning because I might’ve not made the distinction clear (ESL). But it isn’t circular reasoning because I presented a framework that determines how you interpret events and how you respond to them.

Why have this mindset when it's false and there is 0 argument behind it? You were absolutely insistent on it being your fault and that you should pull yourself up by the bootstraps. Where is that now? Now you're just saying it's a mindset but again there is no reason to believe this is true and there is no reason to believe it will help.
It doesn’t have 0 argument behind it, it’s based on a growth mindset influenced by existentialism (you must create yourself and failure is a part of that process), stoicism (it’s not complete failure as long as it leads to learning any knowledge) and modern psychology such as Viktor Frankl’s claim that failure isn’t failure as long as you assign meaning to it. Studies also show that failure is one of the best ways of learning as long as you’re ready for it to hurt your ego (failure paired with reflection). Marcus Aurelius says that you have power only over your thoughts and not the outside events, and that’s why I claim that the only thing you control is your mind and blaming external factors is completely pointless if it’s just going to lead to giving up.

I don’t mean to say that everything is your fault but you should learn to accept when it is and there’s no point dwelling over negatives that come from it.

I’m also only preaching it because I have no reason to believe that it isn’t true and it’s already helped me greatly improve in life. It’s hard to prove a concept this universal so I’m only basing it on knowledge others have already brought to this world and my personal experiences.

What actually is a circular reasoning though is the opposite, a mindset that „I fail because I’m a failure”.

If you want proof I can link some studies on: how a growth mindset is beneficial, how interacting with others is a good way of developing social skills, how approaching women helps with learning how to flirt (as long as you actually reflect on the interaction) and how failure provides deeper conceptual understanding of knowledge.

Let me repeat myself; are you capable of going BEYOND just "you will get rejected but it will feel better than the alternative" because if not then what's the point.
I’m not sure what you mean by this. Do you mean am I capable of explaining it more in depth or do you mean that it depends on the individual if they’re capable of accepting failure?

I responded. You're putting an umbrella of "negative mentality" over someone simply questioning why an 18 YO natural is easily able to do what Hamza struggles to do with roids and another braindead claim. Without this I would have assumed you're a troll but you're 100% serious about this and the bench claim.
You’re not simply questioning it when you’re bringing others down by claiming that „these people literally have zero logic operator in their brains”. I offered proof of my statement because I understand that you’re probably not knowledgable enough about lifting and the Dunning-Kruger effect makes you think that since Hamza can lift 100kg after 6 years of gymceling then no natural 18yo can do so. You didn’t respond because I violated your sanctuary of being always right, not because it’s a braindead claim (it clearly isn’t when I’m living proof jfl)

Anyways, I might’ve missed something in this long ass reply and sorry if that happened. I had a long day and my brain’s too tired to operate at it’s full capacity or something
 
Ur lowkey right the most brutal pill is the mindpill if ur mindset is shit ur life will be shit too
True dat

Any mindset leading to depression or lowered dopamine can literally lower your testosterone and make you miss out on skeletal development
 
  • +1
Reactions: Hxnter
It might seem like circular reasoning because I might’ve not made the distinction clear (ESL). But it isn’t circular reasoning because I presented a framework that determines how you interpret events and how you respond to them.

Nope. Not how it works. It doesn't matter how "great" your conclusion is, it is garbage as long as it has no argument. Which is the case, even if you go on to give more arguments there is no reason to believe it wasn't garbage at the time or that it reflects anything on me for claiming it is circular reasoning. You come off as an 80 IQ copying what boomers say in order to sound smart.

But in reality it's not anyone's fault, especially not the disadvantaged individual's. You didn't even present anything new so why even bring it up? Why not just respond to the circular reasoning fallacy accusation instead of saying this? This is why I say these people have 0 logic processor in their brains, nothing, no ability to live, no soul, nothing. Literal NPC.

It doesn’t have 0 argument behind it, it’s based on a growth mindset influenced by existentialism (you must create yourself and failure is a part of that process),

Read multiple existentialists. They never say failure is part of the process. If you think they're implying it, that's hardly relevant.

stoicism (it’s not complete failure as long as it leads to learning any knowledge)

Sure. Just naming stuff and previous beliefs and thinkers isn't actually an argument like nobody would accept "he thought it so it's true."

and modern psychology such as Viktor Frankl’s claim that failure isn’t failure as long as you assign meaning to it.

Not actually directly mentioned in the OP so yeah.

Studies also show that failure is one of the best ways of learning as long as you’re ready for it to hurt your ego (failure paired with reflection). Marcus Aurelius says that you have power only over your thoughts and not the outside events, and that’s why I claim that the only thing you control is your mind and blaming external factors is completely pointless if it’s just going to lead to giving up.

Not everyone's mental state is the same and some failure is merely confirmation of unfairness. If they are truly out of your control it doesn't matter (in terms of succeeding or not) whether or not you interpret them in a stoic way or not.

It’s hard to prove a concept this universal so I’m only basing it on knowledge others have already brought to this world and my personal experiences.

Doesn't really make sense. And if it's universal... just give a guide for disadvantaged men. You are another male so you can put yourself in the head space. You could tell someone else exactly what to do, how to improve, how to get opportunities etc. IF YOU WERE RIGHT. If you're only basing things on an appeal to authority (well, pinging authority? it's not really clear how much you think it proves things to reference authority but still it's just circular reasoning and this seems extremely desperate to try and say "yeah I have no argument but I guess you should know these guys believed it so I'm basing it on them, when they are literally numerous to the point where they have literally contradictory arguments for why this is the case").

It's clear that this isn't a standard you apply to anyone else and are just replying to feed your ego.

I have no reason to believe your personal experiences did anything but bias you, human beings do not question their own success, human beings are wired for self-deception and to question your own success is the single most taboo thing according to these self-deception mechanisms. Your personal experiences aren't some truth to base a universal belief on or to project unto people with 0 opportunities living in a rigged system.

I’m not sure what you mean by this.

That's impressive.

Simply that it's pointless to point out what you pointed out if it doesn't go beyond "oh it feels better than staying inside." When they still got rejected it goes completely against the whole afforrementioned point and preaching.


You’re not simply questioning it when you’re bringing others down by claiming that „these people literally have zero logic operator in their brains”.

Pfft.


I offered proof of my statement because I understand that you’re probably not knowledgable enough about lifting and the Dunning-Kruger effect makes you think

I literally didn't claim it's physically impossible. You strawmanned me so I have every reason to believe you were just arguing against a strawman.

My argument is based on induction not deduction. I never claimed I am 100% sure it's not true.

because I understand that you’re probably not knowledgable enough about lifting and the Dunning-Kruger effect makes you think that since Hamza can lift 100kg after 6 years of gymceling then no natural 18yo can do so.

If I think an athletic pro in a sport is better than some 18 YO amateur, God forbid I don't get exposed as the actual moron I am, right? (sarcasm)

Again, didn't say it's impossible, there is just no reason for me to not question it.

You didn’t respond because I violated your sanctuary of being always right, not because it’s a braindead claim (it clearly isn’t when I’m living proof jfl)

I stopped responding to the argument. I have no sanctuary of always being right I am literally shamed for practically every non-conformist belief I hold by the mainstream.

And I can't see you, so it's not "living proof" you spastic.


Anyways, I might’ve missed something in this long ass reply and sorry if that happened. I had a long day and my brain’s too tired to operate at it’s full capacity or something

Yeah that doesn't really make a difference, it's certainly not impressive when at 100% either.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: HowToBasic
plus those are serbian/german quotation marks being used to quote english, just to put the average .org ego-arguer's intelligence in perspective
 
  • +1
Reactions: HowToBasic
Nope. Not how it works. It doesn't matter how "great" your conclusion is, it is garbage as long as it has no argument. Which is the case, even if you go on to give more arguments there is no reason to believe it wasn't garbage at the time or that it reflects anything on me for claiming it is circular reasoning. You come off as an 80 IQ copying what boomers say in order to sound smart.
“If you want proof I can link some studies on: how a growth mindset is beneficial, how interacting with others is a good way of developing social skills, how approaching women helps with learning how to flirt (as long as you actually reflect on the interaction) and how failure provides deeper conceptual understanding of knowledge.”

^ I offered to show you proof that lead to that conclusion and why I think that the framework I presented is logically sound. Cambridge Dictionary: “a reason or reasons why you support or oppose an idea or suggestion, or the process od explaining these reasons”. You can go on about how I didn’t present them in the original post but it’s not as if there was no argument behind it so it’s just clinging to details. You claiming it’s circular reasoning while I’m offering to show proof of the singular statement which you’re bothered by (“You’ll get rejected nigga but the pain of failing is better than the pain of not trying”) is nonsensical. Failure offers reflection and a chance to change or adjust, and what does not trying offer? You keep picking at the details but you haven’t presented a single counterargument as to why it’s not true. “You come off as an 80IQ” is your opinion and nothing else as long as you’re not a licensed psychologist or a psychometrician tho
:p

Read multiple existentialists. They never say failure is part of the process. If you think they're implying it, that's hardly relevant.
It’s also hardly relevant what you say about what they’re not implying. By applying logic to what they say you come to a conclusion that it is a part of the process, unless you can prove me wrong(?) it’s just close-minded autistic thinking. Existentialism is about interpretation, not just reading it verbatim. Proof: Friedrich Nietzsche (precursor of existentialism btw) says that there are no facts, only interpretations, Jean-Paul Satre claims that we’re born without meaning/worth and create it through freedom and choices (as I said, your worth isn’t assigned to you because of your failures or predetermined factors).

Also, most of literature is in general about interpretation not literal meaning (study!)

But in reality it's not anyone's fault, especially not the disadvantaged individual's. You didn't even present anything new so why even bring it up? Why not just respond to the circular reasoning fallacy accusation instead of saying this? This is why I say these people have 0 logic processor in their brains, nothing, no ability to live, no soul, nothing. Literal NPC.
So you’re saying that not moving forward in life isn’t the fault of the disadvantaged individual? “Do you really think that if you’re not below the 20th percentile and not below 5’6”” I acknowledged that not everyone is capable of improving as well.
“If you stay in one place- you will be miserable
If you don’t do anything with your life- you will be miserable
If you don’t put effort into anything- you will be miserable
What I was saying that if you don’t put effort into what you want to achieve then you won’t move forward, not blaming people for being born disadvantaged. You’re intentionally misinterpreting my statements because I didn’t make myself crystal clear just to get some kind of leverage.


Sure. Just naming stuff and previous beliefs and thinkers isn't actually an argument like nobody would accept "he thought it so it's true."
Once again, I offered studies and are still offering.

Not actually directly mentioned in the OP so yeah.
So yeah but I’m mentioning it now and you’re not refuting it. Just because I haven’t gone in depth and made the op an Oxford grade essay doesn’t mean that I’ve provided other proof that disproves the study that I’ve given an example with.


Not everyone's mental state is the same and some failure is merely confirmation of unfairness. If they are truly out of your control it doesn't matter (in terms of succeeding or not) whether or not you interpret them in a stoic way or not.
It does matter in what way you interpret them though. The way you interpret failure quite literally affects your wellbeing (another study).


Doesn't really make sense. And if it's universal... just give a guide for disadvantaged men. You are another male so you can put yourself in the head space. You could tell someone else exactly what to do, how to improve, how to get opportunities etc. IF YOU WERE RIGHT. If you're only basing things on an appeal to authority (well, pinging authority? it's not really clear how much you think it proves things to reference authority but still it's just circular reasoning and this seems extremely desperate to try and say "yeah I have no argument but I guess you should know these guys believed it so I'm basing it on them, when they are literally numerous to the point where they have literally contradictory arguments for why this is the case").
“if you were right” I’m never fully right and neither are you or anyone else (maybe besides some god). I did give a vague idea though, I won’t provide a guide because that would require me spending a lifetime gathering resources and writing a book considering every possible unfortunate situation in life. What I can do is give less and less vague set of ways of interpreting situations in your life and how to react to them (which I’m doing right now in the replies). If we were to apply your logic then the statement that the melting point of astatine isn’t 302°C because it’s theorised/estimated and also because you haven’t seen the liquid form of astatine yourself (and also the entire education system is a logical fallacy ig).

You’re asking me to give a precise answer with concrete proof that is applicable to an infinite amount of possibilities and calling it a fallacy because I can’t do so. I’m basing it on other’s people’s (numerous) opinions and my appliance of it in my daily life. The same exact reason why there’s so many contradicting philosophies is why I won’t give you a definitive and universal answer, not because it’s a desperate attempt

It's clear that this isn't a standard you apply to anyone else and are just replying to feed your ego.
I do apply it to my irl friends though (again, unless you can prove me wrong)

It’s not about feeding ego either, you may be rude and unpleasant to argue with but you’re definitely smart and it’s important that I get presented with counterarguments to my statements. I think it’s the best way of broadening one’s mind, even if I’ll end up being proved wrong (failure is the best way to learn after all)

I have no reason to believe your personal experiences did anything but bias you, human beings do not question their own success, human beings are wired for self-deception and to question your own success is the single most taboo thing according to these self-deception mechanisms. Your personal experiences aren't some truth to base a universal belief on or to project unto people with 0 opportunities living in a rigged system.
You have no reason to believe they didn’t bias me either since you haven’t asked for a single situation in which me applying that mindset helped me out.

Once again, I mentioned more than my personal experiences

That's impressive.

Simply that it's pointless to point out what you pointed out if it doesn't go beyond "oh it feels better than staying inside." When they still got rejected it goes completely against the whole afforrementioned point and preaching.
“That’s impressive” when you just weren’t clear (the same thing you bash me for).

As I said, “Do you really think that if you’re not below the 20th percentile and not below 5’6” there is absolutely no girl that’ll want you?”. So, are you saying that a functioning autist or a NT person that isn’t deformed and below 5’6” has no chances on the dating market if they are relatively rich, softmaxxed, hardmaxxed and have improved their social skills through a number of failures (on which they reflect upon obviously)?


Cambridge Dictionary:
- questioning: “expressing doubts about the value or truth of something; showing that you want an answer about something”
- non-constructive: “not useful or helpful”
- criticism: “the act of saying that something or someone is bad”

You’re not questioning, what you’re doing is called destructive criticism.


I literally didn't claim it's physically impossible. You strawmanned me so I have every reason to believe you were just arguing against a strawman.

My argument is based on induction not deduction. I never claimed I am 100% sure it's not true.
“these people have zero logic operating in their brains” while doubting his bench isn’t being open to feedback, and if you don’t go to the gym yourself or are deeply involved in the community what makes you think that watching one youtuber makes you knowledgable enough about it?

If I think an athletic pro in a sport is better than some 18 YO amateur, God forbid I don't get exposed as the actual moron I am, right? (sarcasm)

Again, didn't say it's impossible, there is just no reason for me to not question it.
You’re on a forum which enunciates the importance of genetics while also stating that some individuals are clearly disadvantaged compared to others. If you can’t apply that logic to your intake of information in your every day to day life then why’re you even defending it?

Once again, you know about one gym goer and that shouldn’t make you think that you’re knowledgable enough about the gym to question his bench unless, as I said, the Dunning-Kruger’s effect takes place.

And I can't see you, so it's not "living proof" you spastic.
Yea, and I offered to show you sufficient proof and I still am. Which you’re still not accepting for whatever other reason than violating your sanctuary it might be.

Yeah that doesn't really make a difference, it's certainly not impressive when at 100% either.
It doesn’t matter, what matters is that I’m doing my best to improve it, even right now by arguing with you.

plus those are serbian/german quotation marks being used to quote english, just to put the average .org ego-arguer's intelligence in perspective
ESL- English as second language

The word you’re looking for isn’t “serbian/german”, they’re called german style quotation marks, are used in multiple languages and in no way determine IQ! Guess you learn something new every day, amirite?
 
Another day another teenager who thinks they got it all figured out
 

Similar threads

autistic_tendencies
Replies
11
Views
90
autistic_tendencies
autistic_tendencies
rjx1
Replies
4
Views
52
rjx1
rjx1
WELOVELOOKS
Replies
11
Views
111
WELOVELOOKS
WELOVELOOKS
yvngbreadstick
Replies
3
Views
64
yvngbreadstick
yvngbreadstick

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top