CHEAT CODE FOR 10% BODY FAT

decadouche57

decadouche57

CEO of AAS and Surgeries
Joined
Aug 20, 2025
Posts
11,408
Reputation
18,851
 
  • +1
Reactions: 3pider, HundredManSlayer, Noesis and 4 others
holy self promo
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: decadouche57
This is informational content no diff from showing a MPMD video
i'm going to assume this is a good video based off the user but there is alot of shitposters promoting their course and getting banned in the minute
 
  • +1
Reactions: decadouche57
  • +1
Reactions: hax
test, tren, hgh and reta just for getting to 10% jfl
Some of us are 230+ holding tons of lean tissue not everyone is 150 pounds 20% bf like you dumbass
 
Some of us are 230+ holding tons of lean tissue not everyone is 150 pounds 20% bf like you dumbass
nigga ive literally gone from borderline obese to 180lb lean naturally before discovering org. reta is pretty much the only thing that wouldve helped a bunch. u truly dont need test, tren and hgh alongside reta to get to 10%.
 
nigga ive literally gone from borderline obese to 180lb lean naturally before discovering org. reta is pretty much the only thing that wouldve helped a bunch. u truly dont need test, tren and hgh alongside reta to get to 10%.
Those are for the visual look not just for losing body fat. I can gain in a huge deficit on this stack
 
  • +1
Reactions: Bishoplol
0 reason to run 100mg tren over 50mg or even less pw btw...
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: decadouche57
It explains why u wouldnt want ur test high but not why u couldnt keep tren low.....
- Sides aren't diff between 50 mg and 100 mg
- 50 mg tren doesn't change your look

At 50 mg/week, tren ace is so low that:

  • You barely get any androgen load
  • You barely get nutrient partitioning effects
  • You don’t get the recomposition effect people actually use tren for
  • You might feel a slight libido bump or fullness, but that’s it
At 100 mg/week, tren actually “turns on”:

  • Strength skyrockets
  • Recomp effect is real
  • You burn fat while holding muscle
  • Pumps and hardness go way up

Guys like 1:1 because:

  • Estrogen stays controlled but present
  • Prolactin is easier to manage
  • Mood is more stable
  • Libido doesn’t crash
  • You avoid high-test estrogen bloat
  • You avoid low-test dysphoria and ED
 
- Sides aren't diff between 50 mg and 100 mg
- 50 mg tren doesn't change your look

At 50 mg/week, tren ace is so low that:

  • You barely get any androgen load
  • You barely get nutrient partitioning effects
  • You don’t get the recomposition effect people actually use tren for
  • You might feel a slight libido bump or fullness, but that’s it
At 100 mg/week, tren actually “turns on”:

  • Strength skyrockets
  • Recomp effect is real
  • You burn fat while holding muscle
  • Pumps and hardness go way up

Guys like 1:1 because:

  • Estrogen stays controlled but present
  • Prolactin is easier to manage
  • Mood is more stable
  • Libido doesn’t crash
  • You avoid high-test estrogen bloat
  • You avoid low-test dysphoria and ED
Cmon bro this is based on utterly 0 evidence and you know it.

These are the doseages if you want to convert the original animal studies to humans at the tipping point at which the most possible GR antagonism happens:

(there is a typo on the 90kg one) (also this is subq so IM microdose would be even lower technically)

1765219487772
 
Cmon bro this is based on utterly 0 evidence and you know it.

These are the doseages if you want to convert the original animal studies to humans at the tipping point at which the most possible GR antagonism happens:

(there is a typo on the 90kg one) (also this is subq so IM microdose would be even lower technically)

View attachment 4404646
Rat-to-human conversion for glucocorticoid receptor antagonism is a completely different context than actual PED outcomes in real lifters

The doses you quoted are subcutaneous microdosing studies

SubQ → different plasma curve, different AUC, different weekly androgen exposure than IM.

SubQ microdosing produces way lower bioactive peaks, meaning:

- less androgen receptor (AR) activation
- massively different synergy effect
- little to no measurable performance outcome

That’s why microdose Tren protocols (10–30 mg/wk) became a meme, they don’t do anything except maybe libido changes.

Zero coaches use 50 mg tren for actual recomp outcomes.
 
Rat-to-human conversion for glucocorticoid receptor antagonism is a completely different context than actual PED outcomes in real lifters

The doses you quoted are subcutaneous microdosing studies

SubQ → different plasma curve, different AUC, different weekly androgen exposure than IM.

SubQ microdosing produces way lower bioactive peaks, meaning:

- less androgen receptor (AR) activation
- massively different synergy effect
- little to no measurable performance outcome

That’s why microdose Tren protocols (10–30 mg/wk) became a meme, they don’t do anything except maybe libido changes.

Zero coaches use 50 mg tren for actual recomp outcomes.
What :lul: How is lower peaks a bad thing. If ur so fussed for whatever reason u can use IM if ur terrified that subq is bad when its been proven time and time again to be comparable to IM...

Granted it will take longer to saturate but thats obvious and something you have to plan for if you go with Subq instead of IM.

0 evidence again for the 3 vague bullet points there either.

Mirin the ChatGPT written arrow. Never seen anyone but chatGPT type this in btw:

1765220245887


The reality is there is very small amounts of literature and this is the best we have to go off. It beats bro-science.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: WrothEnd
What :lul: How is lower peaks a bad thing. If ur so fussed for whatever reason u can use IM if ur terrified that subq is bad when its been proven time and time again to be comparable to IM...

Granted it will take longer to saturate but thats obvious and something you have to plan for if you go with Subq instead of IM.

0 evidence again for the 3 vague bullet points there either.

Mirin the ChatGPT written arrow. Never seen anyone but chatGPT type this in btw:

View attachment 4404670

The reality is there is very small amounts of literature and this is the best we have to go off. It beats bro-science.
Keep coping you didn't provide any evidence showing 50 mg is lowest effective dose and guys like you live in theories guys like me actually look fucking good

Post your physique

Why would you pin an oil like tren subq, subs injections can pool under the skin IM is way better
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Whirr22222
Cmon bro this is based on utterly 0 evidence and you know it.

These are the doseages if you want to convert the original animal studies to humans at the tipping point at which the most possible GR antagonism happens:

(there is a typo on the 90kg one) (also this is subq so IM microdose would be even lower technically)

View attachment 4404646I
Imagine watching that guy
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Whirr22222
Keep coping you didn't provide any evidence showing 50 mg is lowest effective dose and guys like you live in theories guys like me actually look fucking good

Post your physique
The evidence is original studies. Still yet to see any of urs except from vague shite from ChatGPT.

Yeah let me just post my physique here because that would surely win the argument and advance knowledge here on the forum and help everyone 👍
 
The evidence is original studies. Still yet to see any of urs except from vague shite from ChatGPT.

Yeah let me just post my physique here because that would surely win the argument and advance knowledge here on the forum and help everyone 👍
Bro are you actually a fucking retard? This much argument for 50 mg vs 100 mg of tren?

That's like arguing between 250 and 300 test

Obv the higher dose is gonna give better results with barely any more sides that's common sense

Talk to any IFBB coach, if you could afford one maybe

Stop coping with rat studies and start living in real life
 
I feel like there are other ways of getting to 10% than taking Tren
The tren and AAS in the stack isn't for losing bodyfat

Its for nutrient partitioning, gaining muscle in a deficit, and hardening

So that way guys look great even at 10% vs looking like a twink with zero muscle
 
  • +1
Reactions: Orka
Bro are you actually a fucking retard? This much argument for 50 mg vs 100 mg of tren?

That's like arguing between 250 and 300 test

Obv the higher dose is gonna give better results with barely any more sides that's common sense

Talk to any IFBB coach, if you could afford one maybe

Stop coping with rat studies and start living in real life
How is that common sense wtf are u even talking about at this point.

Its well known that doses of different compounds have different effects in a non-linear curve. Is that basic piece of knowledge common sense to u???

At this point just run 200 tren why dont u! Thats common sense!

Well done on self reporting that u just regurgitate what ur coach said like its law and passed it off as ur own video also.
 
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Ctrozo, WrothEnd and decadouche57
How is that common sense wtf are u even talking about at this point.

Its well known that doses of different compounds have different effects in a non-linear curve. Is that basic piece of knowledge common sense to u???

At this point just run 200 tren why dont u! Thats common sense!

Well done on self reporting that u just regurgitate what ur coach said like its law and passed it off as ur own video also.
I'm not regurgitating you fucking dumbass I provided more than enough info and actually run these cycles and post my physique unlike you

Either way enjoy your little 10 mg tren ace cycle your a waste of my time welcome ignore
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Whirr22222

Similar threads

decadouche57
Replies
32
Views
236
Swarthy Knight
Swarthy Knight
C
Replies
20
Views
502
Aryan Incel
Aryan Incel
P
Replies
3
Views
76
lopaks41
lopaks41
chadpreetinthemakin
Replies
6
Views
99
chadpreetinthemakin
chadpreetinthemakin

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top