Christmas MASS in the Anglican Church was full of curries

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

TLDR: Church of England is a black and curry church now nothing “english” about it

Cumskins are such a deplorable sorry state of pink demons . Dark skin curries are now the majority in their churches, not gonna say which church I went to but it’s famous let’s just say that and only old whites were there but most were curries @Jason Voorhees type of curries dark skinned ones

And they were loving the whole thing.

How has the cumskins fallen so low? 400 years ago they went around the world saying “CONVERT OR DIE” just ask the Portuguese and Spanish.

Now they are like “MUH GUD AINT REAL I let Tyrone fuck my sister and GF”

 

[Orc]

religion is cucked so it's only natural that ethnics are driven towards it.

 

[Shahnameh]

Brutal for OP, his going to have to have to breed with a Pajeeta Christian JFL

 

[Daddy's Home]

religion is cucked so it's only natural that ethnics are driven towards it.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

religion is cucked so it's only natural that ethnics are driven towards it.

Look at the state of white nations without Jesus

You faggots are fighting over gender pronouns and allow blacks to fuck your girlfriends

You whites allow rampant Islamic invasion fleets and then cry when they turn areas of Europe into sharia law zones and you lot do nothing about it

Ever since you got rid of “religion” you idiots have been cucks Europe (west) is doomed to be an caliphate inshallah

Brutal for OP, his going to have to have to breed with a Pajeeta Christian JFL

I do better with Roman Catholic and Muslim foids. I won’t have to breed with one cos I’m not Chruch of England I just went there cos my mums family is.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Im a protestant not catholic

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Im a protestant not catholic

I know im not catholic either… your Church of England right? They are Anglican aka Protestant

 

[Orc]

Look at the state of white nations without Jesus

the biggest miracle in the bible is jesus being born as a white man in the middle east.

if you thought for a second that any form of the scripture has anything to do with european culture your head is up your ass, the old testament the bible and the quran are all iterations of the same thing (p1 p2 p3) and they're all from the shitskin part of the world written by illiterate camel traders and old pedophilic gay men several decades after the events they wrote about already happened.

 

[Jason Voorhees]

I know im not catholic either… your Church of England right? They are Anglican aka Protestant

Methodist. Most methodist in the US are white. Ethnics are a minority. Also CoE is like an inbetween catholic and protestant after King Henry.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Methodist. Most methodist in the US are white. Ethnics are a minority. Also CoE is like an inbetween catholic and protestant after King Henry.

In UK Methodist are just blacks and working class whites tbh

the biggest miracle in the bible is jesus being born as a white man in the middle east.

if you thought for a second that and form of the scripture has anything to do with european culture your head is up your ass, the old testament the bible and the quran are all iterations of the same thing (p1 p2 p3) and they're all from the shitskin part of the world written by illiterate camel traders and old pedophilic gay men.

Jesus wasn’t a “white” man dunno where you got that from lol are you a fucking retard

Have you got any arguments against religion other than stupid nonsensical sophistic ramblings. I noticed you GAYtheists are obsessed with holy books? You realise Christian’s aren’t book worshippers like Muslims (unless Protestants because they are low IQ) our religion existed before the New Testament.

Anyways continue having ethnics take over your shitty western lands etc meanwhile Eastern Europeans will be saved by Christ for their faith and have 0 ethnics meanwhile your land will be mixed up.

 

[St.TikTokcel]

TLDR: Church of England is a black and curry church now nothing “english” about it

Cumskins are such a deplorable sorry state of pink demons . Dark skin curries are now the majority in their churches, not gonna say which church I went to but it’s famous let’s just say that and only old whites were there but most were curries @Jason Voorhees type of curries dark skinned ones

And they were loving the whole thing.

How has the cumskins fallen so low? 400 years ago they went around the world saying “CONVERT OR DIE” just ask the Portuguese and Spanish.

Now they are like “MUH GUD AINT REAL I let Tyrone fuck my sister and GF”

2% of the world is white. Majority of new gens are brown. What did you expect and yes, younger gens dgaf about religion.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

2% of the world is white. Majority of new gens are brown. What did you expect and yes, younger gens dgaf about religion.

My Orthodox Churches are full of many young whites. 30% of the church are young men and women around 16-30 so we aren’t having the same issues that Protestants and Catholics are having .

We even have youth group chats with over 30 members we aren’t having issues getting younger gen’s

And 8% of world pop is white not 2 and whites are a race of idiotic apostates. They served their purpose. @SecularIslamist is always hating on the Arabs for being Musherik but Arabs are still all Muslim. Compare that to whites which are an entire race of apostates essentially all of them in the west are. You should stop crying about Arabs they are still Muslim

 

[Mosh12]

Islamo-Judaism mogs

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Islamo-Judaism mogs

I know you’re larping your race. Cease and desist or enter my ignore list

 

[Mosh12]

I know you’re larping your race. Cease and desist or enter my ignore list

Your race has never achieved anything. Laughing stock

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Your race has never achieved anything. Laughing stock

We achieved fucking your women

 

[Orc]

Jesus wasn’t a “white” man dunno where you got that from lol are you a fucking retard

church depictions.

Have you got any arguments against religion other than stupid nonsensical sophistic ramblings.

there is no need to make any arguments against religion, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim, until they're able to support their hypothesis.

every derivative of their argument based on the merit they haven't supported is also instantly irrelevant due to this.

I noticed you GAYtheists are obsessed with holy books? You realise Christian’s aren’t book worshippers like Muslims (unless Protestants because they are low IQ) our religion existed before the New Testament.

christians only point towards the bible when they're gasping at straws.

Anyways continue having ethnics take over your shitty western lands etc meanwhile Eastern Europeans will be saved by Christ for their faith and have 0 ethnics meanwhile your land will be mixed up.

eastern europeans are already mix race, you aren't saving anyone.

 

[Mosh12]

We achieved fucking your women

Indians?

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

church depictions.

there is no need to make any arguments against religion, the burden of proof is on the person making the claim, until they're able to support their hypothesis.

every derivative of their argument based on the merit they haven't supported is also instantly irrelevant due to this.

christians only point towards the bible when they're gasping at straws.

eastern europeans are already mix race, you aren't saving anyone.

European church depictions*

Have you seen Ethiopian, Japanese or Egyptian Coptic interpretations of Christ?

Either way it doesn’t matter we don’t know what he looked like and if Europeans want to depict him as their own what’s the issue


No the burden of proof is on the GAYtheist who makes a universal quantifiyer shift fallacy by saying that god doesn’t exist which implies you have universal knowledge. You have to have an account for epistemology metaphysics and ethics until you come up with an account for those GAYtheism will always be fake and GAY.


When have I pointed to the bible in this debate? Sure mate. Christian’s who don’t know how to debate GAYtheidts do that but I know your retarded bitch made kind I won’t use the bible as an authority to an GAYtheist when you guys don’t believe in it that argument only holds for believers.

Eastern Europeans are Christian’s and are 100% white and surprise surprise Christian’s

Western Europeans are GAYTHIEST and flooded with immagritns LGBTQ and cannabalistic governments which want to kill the natives which you idiots deserve btw for your apostasy I hope western whites get swamped out of existence you idiots don’t deserve to live

 

[Chadeep]

Ethnics in Church. Muslim Prayer in School. What's Next? Probably Sharia law

 

[Orc]

European church depictions*

Have you seen Ethiopian, Japanese or Egyptian Coptic interpretations of Christ?

jesus is also white in kenya.

No the burden of proof is on the GAYtheist who makes a universal quantifiyer shift fallacy by saying that god doesn’t exist which implies you have universal knowledge. You have to have an account for epistemology metaphysics and ethics until you come up with an account for those GAYtheism will always be fake and GAY.

'doesn't' is a negative claim, the burden of proof is on the person making the positive claim.

as far as you cannot provide objective, replicable, demonstrable evidence for god, every other claim that relies on this is automatically null without exceptions.

not a single part of the scripture needs to be contemplated until this happens, in fact any sort of 'theism' is an irrelevant position which assigns value to your position that it does not have, atheists don't actually exist, because there's no value in denying a claim that has nothing backing it.

When have I pointed to the bible in this debate? Sure mate. Christian’s who don’t know how to debate GAYtheidts do that but I know your retarded bitch made kind I won’t use the bible as an authority to an GAYtheist when you guys don’t believe in it that argument only holds for believers.

dnr

Eastern Europeans are Christian’s and are 100% white and surprise surprise Christian’s

you're the grandchildren of genghis khan.

Western Europeans are GAYTHIEST and flooded with immagritns LGBTQ and cannabalistic governments which want to kill the natives which you idiots deserve btw for your apostasy I hope western whites get swamped out of existence you idiots don’t deserve to live

there is less than 2% non western migration in most of europe.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

Ethnics in Church. Muslim Prayer in School. What's Next? Probably Sharia law

Yep. And western whites deserve to be put under sharia I long for the day. They will learn that their stupid vapid belief of GAYtheism had no response to rampant JIHADISM it’s over for them.

jesus is also white in kenya.

'doesn't' is a negative claim, the burden of proof is on the person making the positive claim.

as far as you cannot provide objective, replicable, demonstrable evidence for god, every other claim that relies on this is automatically null without exceptions.

not a single part of the scripture needs to be contemplated until this happens, in fact any sort of 'theism' is an irrelevant position which assigns value to your position that it does not have, atheists don't actually exist, because there's no value in denying a claim that has nothing backing it.

dnr

View attachment 3393452

you're the grandchildren of genghis khan.

there is less than 2% non western migration in most of europe.

Yeah because most Africans take from western Christian traditions and in those he’s shown as white because Ethiopians never evangelised and neither did Egyptians the to threat of PISSlam so they converted to western Christianity duuuuuhhhhh

I never mentioned scripture, once again your strawmanning me, I asked you how do you account for real invariant, a strict universal entities such as mathematics, ethics, epistemology, the self, identity over time, etc. until then your beliefs are illogical. In fact under GAYtheism we are all just producers of random bioelectrical chemical wiring so I’m Christian for the same reason your atheist because my brain says so.

Eastern Europeans are going to be the only whites soon take the L and move on

 

[JeanneDArcAlter]

My Orthodox Churches are full of many young whites. 30% of the church are young men and women around 16-30 so we aren’t having the same issues that Protestants and Catholics are having .

We even have youth group chats with over 30 members we aren’t having issues getting younger gen’s

And 8% of world pop is white not 2 and whites are a race of idiotic apostates. They served their purpose. @SecularIslamist is always hating on the Arabs for being Musherik but Arabs are still all Muslim. Compare that to whites which are an entire race of apostates essentially all of them in the west are. You should stop crying about Arabs they are still Muslim

How did your parents react when u became Orthodox
Or r u ethiopian?

 

[PsychoH]

religion is cucked so it's only natural that ethnics are driven towards it.

My kingz you disappoint me.
Christ is God.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

My kingz you disappoint me.
Christ is God.

He’s a retarded GAYtheist all he can do is say “Bible and all holy books cannot be true because I’m a GAYthiest “

 

[Orc]

Yeah because most Africans take from western Christian traditions and in those he’s shown as white because Ethiopians never evangelised and neither did Egyptians the to threat of PISSlam so they converted to western Christianity duuuuuhhhhh

christianity is not western, it originates from shitskin cultures and was spread by shitskin cultures namely the portugese and spanish.

I never mentioned scripture, once again your strawmanning me,

any religious argument relies by default on scripture, you don't have to distinctively point it out.

I asked you how do you account for real invariant, a strict universal entities such as mathematics, ethics, epistemology, the self, identity over time, etc. until then your beliefs are illogical.

I don't account for it, I don't have to.

I don't make any claims regarding it, YOU DO, so the burden of proof is on you.

In fact under GAYtheism we are all just producers of random bioelectrical chemical wiring so I’m Christian for the same reason your atheist because my brain says so.

dnr

Eastern Europeans are going to be the only whites soon take the L and move on

they aren't white to begin with, never were, never will be.

 

[mr007]

Jesus is gay Allah is king

Allah hu akbar

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

christianity is not western, it originates from shitskin cultures and was spread by shitskin cultures namely the portugese and spanish.

any religious argument relies by default on scripture, you don't have to distinctively point it out.

I don't account for it, I don't have to.

I don't make any claims regarding it, YOU DO, so the burden of proof is on you.


dnr

they aren't white to begin with, never were, never will be.

Some schools of thought originate in Europe so yes “western” Christianity is accurate depiction for Protescuckism and Roman Catholicism. You can keep coping but the beliefs these two hold were formulated by western scholastic traditions.

I myself am an Eastern Christian so my theology is eastern.

Ok so where does ethnics, knowledge and metaphysics come from? How do you explain universals such as mathematics, we can’t grasp these things we can’t see them but we know they exist and thus can utilise them in day to do but the source of them we cannot see touch or feel we can’t grasp these things. Explain this where do they come from?

You’re a slow boy so here’s a video for you, and no I’d never use the bible to try convince and GAYtheist


Slavs are white end of discussion so are MEDs. Come with a convincing proof for these trascendental arguments and I’ll consider your GAYtheism but until then you can’t even explain how speech can work in space time to be understood by the self.

 

[Orc]

Some schools of thought originate in Europe so yes “western” Christianity is accurate depiction for Protescuckism and Roman Catholicism. You can keep coping but the beliefs these two hold were formulated by western scholastic traditions.

all of christianity originates from the middle east, there is no 'western' christianity.

your ancestors only follow it because they got raped and had their traditions stolen from them because they were weak, if anything continuing to follow them is some weird form of cuckoldry.

I myself am an Eastern Christian so my theology is eastern.

doesn't exist.

Ok so where does ethnics, knowledge and metaphysics come from?

don't know, don't care.

now provide replicable, physical demonstrable evidence for god.

How do you explain universals such as mathematics, we can’t grasp these things we can’t see them but we know they exist and thus can utilise them in day to do but the source of them we cannot see touch or feel we can’t grasp these things. Explain this where do they come from?

don't know, don't care.

you are the only one claiming to know where this comes from, nobody else does this, so the burden of proof is fully and completely on you, and until you can demonstrate it every other part of your argument is null and doesn't need to be listened to.

You’re a slow boy so here’s a video for you, and no I’d never use the bible to try convince and GAYtheist

dnr

Slavs are white end of discussion so are MEDs.

neither is white.

Come with a convincing proof for these trascendental arguments and I’ll consider your GAYtheism but until then you can’t even explain how speech can work in space time to be understood by the self.

I don't need to prove anything, the burden of proof is not on me because I am not making any claims, I am merely pointing out there is no evidence for yours, and therefore everything you say is meaningless.

 

[PsychoH]

christianity is not western, it originates from shitskin cultures and was spread by shitskin cultures namely the portugese and spanish.

any religious argument relies by default on scripture, you don't have to distinctively point it out.

I don't account for it, I don't have to.

I don't make any claims regarding it, YOU DO, so the burden of proof is on you.


dnr

they aren't white to begin with, never were, never will be.

Spains aren’t shitskin but Portugese are kinda mixed. Also Christianity is from the Middle East but that doesn’t matter.
Orc my friend please don’t be so naive,
Just think about it. Probeer het niet automatisch te negeren wat je leest in de Bijbel, denk er even over na. Begin bij het Nieuwe Testament.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

all of christianity originates from the middle east, there is no 'western' christianity.

your ancestors only follow it because they got raped and had their traditions stolen from them because they were weak, if anything continuing to follow them is some weird form of cuckoldry.

doesn't exist.

don't know, don't care.

now provide replicable, physical demonstrable evidence for god.

don't know, don't care.

you are the only one claiming to know where this comes from, nobody else does this, so the burden of proof is fully and completely on you, and until you can demonstrate it every other part of your argument is null and doesn't need to be listened to.

dnr

neither is white.

I don't need to prove anything, the burden of proof is not on me because I am not making any claims, I am merely pointing out there is no evidence for yours, and therefore everything you say is meaningless.

Low IQ retarded take of how Christianity spread .

My people converted via choice and because it’s logically sound and moggs pagan god we used to worship. Ironically the same reason Europeans abandoned ODIN


OK ILL do the transcendental argument



Core Structure of TAG

1. The Preconditions of Intelligibility:

• The argument begins by stating that certain aspects of reality—like logic, morality, and the uniformity of nature—are preconditions of intelligibility. In other words, for humans to reason, think, and understand the world, these must exist and be coherent.


2. The Need for a Foundation:

• These preconditions require a metaphysical foundation. For example:

• Logic requires a universal, immaterial, and unchanging standard.

• Morality requires an objective and universal moral lawgiver.

• Science requires the uniformity of nature, which allows us to trust that the laws of physics and chemistry won’t randomly change.


3. God as the Only Sufficient Ground:

• The argument asserts that the Christian God uniquely provides the necessary foundation for these preconditions. Specifically:

• The unchanging nature of God accounts for the unchanging nature of logical laws.

• God’s moral nature provides the foundation for objective morality.

• God’s sovereign control ensures the uniformity of nature.


4. The Impossibility of the Contrary:

• TAG claims that without God, atheistic or naturalistic worldviews cannot adequately account for the preconditions of intelligibility.

• For example, in a purely materialistic worldview:

• Logic is reduced to a human construct and lacks universality or immutability.

• Morality becomes subjective and culturally relative.

• Science cannot justify the assumption that nature will remain uniform in the future.


5. Conclusion:

• Therefore, God exists because He is the only explanation for the intelligibility of reality.



TLDR:
In conclusion, the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) asserts that the very foundations of intelligibility—logic, morality, and science—presuppose the existence of the Christian God. Without God, these concepts lack a sufficient grounding, leading to inconsistencies in atheistic or naturalistic worldviews. TAG argues that only the Christian worldview provides a coherent explanation for these universal preconditions, making the existence of God necessary and the “impossibility of the contrary” a key proof of His existence.

 

[Orc]

Low IQ retarded take of how Christianity spread .

accurate depiction of it, fundamentally it is still some horseshit written by old men in the middle east almost a century after the events happened.

there's also constant references in it to books that no longer exist and no one has read.

My people converted via choice and because it’s logically sound and moggs pagan god we used to worship. Ironically the same reason Europeans abandoned ODIN

no one converted by choice, their religious monuments were destroyed and they were forcefully converted.

you are ignorant on european history,

OK ILL do the transcendental argument



Core Structure of TAG

1. The Preconditions of Intelligibility:

• The argument begins by stating that certain aspects of reality—like logic, morality, and the uniformity of nature—are preconditions of intelligibility. In other words, for humans to reason, think, and understand the world, these must exist and be coherent.


2. The Need for a Foundation:

• These preconditions require a metaphysical foundation. For example:

• Logic requires a universal, immaterial, and unchanging standard.

• Morality requires an objective and universal moral lawgiver.

• Science requires the uniformity of nature, which allows us to trust that the laws of physics and chemistry won’t randomly change.


3. God as the Only Sufficient Ground:

• The argument asserts that the Christian God uniquely provides the necessary foundation for these preconditions. Specifically:

• The unchanging nature of God accounts for the unchanging nature of logical laws.

• God’s moral nature provides the foundation for objective morality.

• God’s sovereign control ensures the uniformity of nature.


4. The Impossibility of the Contrary:

• TAG claims that without God, atheistic or naturalistic worldviews cannot adequately account for the preconditions of intelligibility.

• For example, in a purely materialistic worldview:

• Logic is reduced to a human construct and lacks universality or immutability.

• Morality becomes subjective and culturally relative.

• Science cannot justify the assumption that nature will remain uniform in the future.


5. Conclusion:

• Therefore, God exists because He is the only explanation for the intelligibility of reality.

direct replicable physical evidence of god is required to assume it exists, you haven't provided this, therefore he doesn't and your claim doesn't have to be considered.

TLDR:
In conclusion, the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) asserts that the very foundations of intelligibility—logic, morality, and science—presuppose the existence of the Christian God. Without God, these concepts lack a sufficient grounding, leading to inconsistencies in atheistic or naturalistic worldviews. TAG argues that only the Christian worldview provides a coherent explanation for these universal preconditions, making the existence of God necessary and the “impossibility of the contrary” a key proof of His existence.

these are derivative claims based on a concept you've provided no evidence for.

FIRST, the existence of god itself must be proven before any further claims can be made, you've failed to do so, and so has every single other person on the planet ever.

Spains aren’t shitskin but Portugese are kinda mixed. Also Christianity is from the Middle East but that doesn’t matter.
Orc my friend please don’t be so naive,
Just think about it. Probeer het niet automatisch te negeren wat je leest in de Bijbel, denk er even over na. Begin bij het Nieuwe Testament.

not a single part of south europe was considered white until 1980 for obvious reasons for they are brown.

the bible is an abomination of contradictions, no actual sane person can read this shit without figuring out it was written by old men in the desert.

 

[mr007]

Spains aren’t shitskin but Portugese are kinda mixed. Also Christianity is from the Middle East but that doesn’t matter.
Orc my friend please don’t be so naive,
Just think about it. Probeer het niet automatisch te negeren wat je leest in de Bijbel, denk er even over na. Begin bij het Nieuwe Testament.

Why you are so desperate for his cock tho

 

[PsychoH]

accurate depiction of it, fundamentally it is still some horseshit written by old men in the middle east almost a century after the events happened.

not almost a century after.

there's also constant references in it to books that no longer exist and no one has read.

like?

no one converted by choice, their religious monuments were destroyed and they were forcefully converted.

you are ignorant on european history,

this is kinda true.

direct replicable physical evidence of god is required to assume it exists, you haven't provided this, therefore he doesn't and your claim doesn't have to be considered.

Jesus' blood only consisted of half the chromosomes, 23. Which is impossible, this means it only had one parent, the Holy Virgin Mary.
We know this because even bizarrer, samples of his blood were STILL alive, which is also impossible yet true.
The Shroud of Turin is impossible to replicate, let alone it shouldnt exist. It still does and some of the smartest people working on debunking it ended up converting due to the 'alarming' evidence.

these are derivative claims based on a concept you've provided no evidence for.

FIRST, the existence of god itself must be proven before any further claims can be made, you've failed to do so, and so has every single other person on the planet ever.

No thats not my kingz, thats not true cmon mane.

not a single part of south europe was considered white until 1980 for obvious reasons for they are brown.

browns could never create something like the spanish empire.

the bible is an abomination of contradictions, no actual sane person can read this shit without figuring out it was written by old men in the desert.

i can, its a case of theological knowledge.

 

[PsychoH]

Why you are so desperate for his cock tho

Of who?
Orc? He is just a very cool friend. I'm not desperate for anyones dick because i'm straight.

 

[got.daim]

TLDR: Church of England is a black and curry church now nothing “english” about it

 

[mr007]

Of who?
Orc? He is just a very cool friend. I'm not desperate for anyones dick because i'm straight.

Ok

 

[Orc]

not almost a century after.

the book of mark was 30 years after jesus already died, and that's like the earliest mention, the others are up to a century afterwards.

the bible is senile barely literate old men interpreting several other books that no longer exist in order to gain life advice from them, the original books they source for their claims no longer exist, some of these are the kings of israel and the kings of judah.

like?

see above, you'll find them directly quoting these books in the old testament.

Jesus' blood only consisted of half the chromosomes, 23. Which is impossible, this means it only had one parent, the Holy Virgin Mary.
We know this because even bizarrer, samples of his blood were STILL alive, which is also impossible yet true.
The Shroud of Turin is impossible to replicate, let alone it shouldnt exist. It still does and some of the smartest people working on debunking it ended up converting due to the 'alarming' evidence.

parthenogenesis exists, not in humans though.

No thats not my kingz, thats not true cmon mane.

not a single derivative of a god claim can be made before god himself is directly demonstrated to exist, not a single mention, passage, event or deed has to be considered before that.

browns could never create something like the spanish empire.

the first civilizations aren't from europe.

that they're not white doesn't mean they weren't competent.

i can, its a case of theological knowledge.

you never read the old testament otherwise you'd be aware of how bad the bible is, it is literally impossible for it to be a complete book or the word of god.

in fact the bible was never supposed to be a book, they're the interpretations of people who read books that no longer exist.

the new testament is mostly just random letters someone saved, some fraudulently made, between Paul and a few churches after jesus had already passed away.

the life of Jesus is very likely so full of made up mythology from peasants at the time telling the story orally that the real Jesus is impossible to discover who he actually was.

there are even gospels purposefully withheld from the bible because they directly contradict other texts.

like the book of enoch or the gospel of thomas.

the current version of the "bible" was made during the council of nicea by the roman catholic church in 325 AD where they put together all the random texts they had that aligned with the catholic beliefs at the time, more shit was excluded from it at that time to make it somewhat pass as a comprehensible story.

like the gospel of judas that was written 180 years after Jesus died that states that the God who created this world was evil and this world is bad and judaism is evil

 

[PsychoH]

the book of mark was 30 years after jesus already died, and that's like the earliest mention, the others are up to a century afterwards.

the bible is senile barely literate old men interpreting several other books that no longer exist in order to gain life advice from them, the original books they source for their claims no longer exist, some of these are the kings of israel and the kings of judah.

see above, you'll find them directly quoting these books in the old testament.

parthenogenesis exists, not in humans though.

not a single derivative of a god claim can be made before god himself is directly demonstrated to exist, not a single mention, passage, event or deed has to be considered before that.

the first civilizations aren't from europe.

that they're not white doesn't mean they weren't competent.

you never read the old testament otherwise you'd be aware of how bad the bible is, it is literally impossible for it to be a complete book or the word of god.

in fact the bible was never supposed to be a book, they're the interpretations of people who read books that no longer exist.

the new testament is mostly just random letters someone saved, some fraudulently made, between Paul and a few churches after jesus had already passed away.

the life of Jesus is very likely so full of made up mythology from peasants at the time telling the story orally that the real Jesus is impossible to discover who he actually was.

there are even gospels purposefully withheld from the bible because they directly contradict other texts.

like the book of enoch or the gospel of thomas.

the current version of the "bible" was made during the council of nicea by the roman catholic church in 325 AD where they put together all the random texts they had that aligned with the catholic beliefs at the time, more shit was excluded from it at that time to make it somewhat pass as a comprehensible story.

like the gospel of judas that was written 180 years after Jesus died that states that the God who created this world was evil and this world is bad and judaism is evil

my theology cant answer all these without giving a wrong answer, @PrinceLuenLeoncur ?

 

[Orc]

my theology cant answer all these without giving a wrong answer, @PrinceLuenLeoncur ?

neither can he because christians don't read their own scripture, otherwise they'd stop believing in it, they just fantasize about their shitty history that was mostly forceful conquest of broke peasants.

every time they send mercenaries towards people who aren't starving and retarded they end up losing their faith.



also the reason the bible was written so long after jesus already died is because he originally believed the world was going to end right away so people didn't feel the need to write it down.

after that the quran was written by muhammad entire countries away in an entirely different language by an illiterate camel trader 600 years after christianity was already establish, not only was muhammad not a prophet but he was not jewish nor was he a christian nor did he even have the ability to read either of the texts.

and that's the third saga of this shit book.

the book of gospel of judas is one of the worst books I've ever read, it's literally retard lore.

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

the book of mark was 30 years after jesus already died, and that's like the earliest mention, the others are up to a century afterwards.

the bible is senile barely literate old men interpreting several other books that no longer exist in order to gain life advice from them, the original books they source for their claims no longer exist, some of these are the kings of israel and the kings of judah.

see above, you'll find them directly quoting these books in the old testament.

parthenogenesis exists, not in humans though.

not a single derivative of a god claim can be made before god himself is directly demonstrated to exist, not a single mention, passage, event or deed has to be considered before that.

the first civilizations aren't from europe.

that they're not white doesn't mean they weren't competent.

you never read the old testament otherwise you'd be aware of how bad the bible is, it is literally impossible for it to be a complete book or the word of god.

in fact the bible was never supposed to be a book, they're the interpretations of people who read books that no longer exist.

the new testament is mostly just random letters someone saved, some fraudulently made, between Paul and a few churches after jesus had already passed away.

the life of Jesus is very likely so full of made up mythology from peasants at the time telling the story orally that the real Jesus is impossible to discover who he actually was.

there are even gospels purposefully withheld from the bible because they directly contradict other texts.

like the book of enoch or the gospel of thomas.

the current version of the "bible" was made during the council of nicea by the roman catholic church in 325 AD where they put together all the random texts they had that aligned with the catholic beliefs at the time, more shit was excluded from it at that time to make it somewhat pass as a comprehensible story.

Ok and what’s the issue with that? Mark was a literal CHILD (teenager and 12) when Jesus was taken by the romans so 12+ 30 =42 he would had been 42 and he was given confirmation by Jesus’s apostles such as Peter and John. Remember Jesus’s followers couldn’t write (Matthew being the exception because he was a tax collector)


The latest gospel logically is around 80-100 ad which is book of John but John was said to live to the age of 90 which makes sense and it’s written by accounts that even in his 80s he was active going and visiting many places.

So there’s no issue here

Now you make baseless assertions on the validity of the New Testament with 0 evidence to corroborate your baseless shameless claims



The current “bible” wasn’t made during the council of Nicea it was canonised in the council but the books everybody was using remained the same before the council you absolute historical illiterate retard those steroids must had went into your gay skull and made your muscles bigger but brain dumber

The Roman Catholic Church only came into existence in the 1043 you absolute mongoloid

The “gospels” that are not considered cannnon or in the bible are due to the lack of credibility in the text, gnostic texts were written hundreds of years after Christ and by those who never met him, not only this but Enoch cannot be verified because it was written so long ago we can’t test its validity thoroughly. This lends credence to the credibility of the Bible unlike your stupid beliefs

@PsychoH xont argue the Bible with GAYtheists they want you to do this because they can just wave anything you say away with “MUH it’s insufficient to me” the Bible holds no authority to the GAYtheist mind, argue philosophy with the GAYthiest instead and humiliate them

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

neither can he because christians don't read their own scripture, otherwise they'd stop believing in it, they just fantasize about their shitty history that was mostly forceful conquest of broke peasants.

every time they send mercenaries towards people who aren't starving and retarded they end up losing their faith.



also the reason the bible was written so long after jesus already died is because he originally believed the world was going to end right away so people didn't feel the need to write it down.

after that the quran was written by muhammad entire countries away in an entirely different language by an illiterate camel trader 600 years after christianity was already establish, not only was muhammad not a prophet but he was not jewish nor was he a christian nor did he even have the ability to read either of the texts.

and that's the third saga of this shit book.

the book of gospel of judas is one of the worst books I've ever read, it's literally retard lore.

I have read my own scripture your just a fucking stupid orc cunt non believer, your nation will be Muslim soon anyways so who cares and your daughter will be a dirty little white whore for Abdullah enjoy faggot Orc.

Nothing you have said has made me doubt in the Old Testament how about making actual arguments as apposed to stupid bullshit assertions based on nothing

All you do is use Fallacies. And your fucking GAYTHIEST you have YET TO TELL ME WHY SOMETHING IS WRONG WHY BEING A PEDO IS WRONG AS YOU SO APTLY PUT IT WHY IS IT WRONG IN YOUR FAGGOTRY WORLDVIEW

 

[PrinceLuenLeoncur]

accurate depiction of it, fundamentally it is still some horseshit written by old men in the middle east almost a century after the events happened.

there's also constant references in it to books that no longer exist and no one has read.

no one converted by choice, their religious monuments were destroyed and they were forcefully converted.

you are ignorant on european history,


direct replicable physical evidence of god is required to assume it exists, you haven't provided this, therefore he doesn't and your claim doesn't have to be considered.

these are derivative claims based on a concept you've provided no evidence for.

FIRST, the existence of god itself must be proven before any further claims can be made, you've failed to do so, and so has every single other person on the planet ever.



not a single part of south europe was considered white until 1980 for obvious reasons for they are brown.

the bible is an abomination of contradictions, no actual sane person can read this shit without figuring out it was written by old men in the desert.

Im African I know my history you pink skinned faggot with steroid pox marks don’t tell me my fucking history you stupid cunt we willingly converted most of us know which ancestor converted first and it wasn’t by “force” you stupid bitch

God is the necessary precondition for Y

So even writing this sentence requires you using the divine mind of God.


If you fucking read my response you’d know this

@PsychoH learn these arguments and you can shut down any Faggot like Orc
1. “The existence of God must first be proven…”

This claim assumes a particular epistemological stance: that God’s existence must be proven through empirical evidence or logical deduction before any further claims can be entertained. Here’s a possible reply:


• Challenge the Atheist’s Epistemology:

“What kind of proof would you accept for the existence of God? Many theists argue that God, as a transcendent being, may not be subject to empirical verification in the same way material objects are. Philosophical arguments like the Cosmological Argument, Teleological Argument, and the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) aim to provide rational foundations for belief in God. These arguments aren’t ‘proof’ in a scientific sense but operate on philosophical reasoning, similar to other metaphysical questions like the nature of consciousness or the laws of logic.”


• Counter with TAG
“Without God, how do you account for universal, immaterial, and unchanging concepts like logic, morality, and the uniformity of nature? These are foundational to reasoning itself, and the Christian worldview provides a coherent explanation for their existence.”


GAYtheism is inheritally illogical as it violates 2 of the laws of logic, principle sufficient reason (there’s a reason and first point for everything) and rule of excluded middle (GAYthiestd focus on subjectivity for everything but that’s illogical as you can’t have subjectivity for everything otherwise Epistemology breaks down)

 

[PsychoH]

Im African I know my history you pink skinned faggot with steroid pox marks don’t tell me my fucking history you stupid cunt we willingly converted most of us know which ancestor converted first and it wasn’t by “force” you stupid bitch

God is the necessary precondition for Y

So even writing this sentence requires you using the divine mind of God.


If you fucking read my response you’d know this

@PsychoH learn these arguments and you can shut down any Faggot like Orc
1. “The existence of God must first be proven…”

This claim assumes a particular epistemological stance: that God’s existence must be proven through empirical evidence or logical deduction before any further claims can be entertained. Here’s a possible reply:


• Challenge the Atheist’s Epistemology:

“What kind of proof would you accept for the existence of God? Many theists argue that God, as a transcendent being, may not be subject to empirical verification in the same way material objects are. Philosophical arguments like the Cosmological Argument, Teleological Argument, and the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) aim to provide rational foundations for belief in God. These arguments aren’t ‘proof’ in a scientific sense but operate on philosophical reasoning, similar to other metaphysical questions like the nature of consciousness or the laws of logic.”


• Counter with TAG
“Without God, how do you account for universal, immaterial, and unchanging concepts like logic, morality, and the uniformity of nature? These are foundational to reasoning itself, and the Christian worldview provides a coherent explanation for their existence.”

Based also damn Orc does steroids?
Orc that ain’t it don’t do them.
Very nice reasoning prince.

 

[PsychoH]

And it’s true, Ethiopian Bibles existed far before any kind of “oppression”.

 

[Orc]

Ok and what’s the issue with that? Mark was a literal CHILD (teenager and 12) when Jesus was taken by the romans so 12+ 30 =42 he would had been 42 and he was given confirmation by Jesus’s apostles such as Peter and John. Remember Jesus’s followers couldn’t write (Matthew being the exception because he was a tax collector)

ah yes, I love reading the crackpot theories of children.

none of the authors of the gospels ever claim to have met jesus or to have known anyone else who met Jesus.

The latest gospel logically is around 80-100 ad which is book of John but John was said to live to the age of 90 which makes sense and it’s written by accounts that even in his 80s he was active going and visiting many places.

most of the bible was written in greek language and literary styles by supposingly aramaic fishermen that didn't speak those.

peter and john are described as illiterate in the bible itself by the way.

So there’s no issue here

Now you make baseless assertions on the validity of the New Testament with 0 evidence to corroborate your baseless shameless claims

the bible fundamentally relies on the concept of god, which there is no evidence for, so it would be horseshit even if it wasn't such a jumbled poorly written piece of shit.

The current “bible” wasn’t made during the council of Nicea it was canonised in the council but the books everybody was using remained the same before the council you absolute historical illiterate retard those steroids must had went into your gay skull and made your muscles bigger but brain dumber

they took several gospels out that contradicted catholic beliefs at the time.

The Roman Catholic Church only came into existence in the 1043 you absolute mongoloid

the nicene council is considered by all as the first ecumenical council of the church (Roman Catholic Church) you absolute historically illiterate imbecile.

The “gospels” that are not considered cannnon or in the bible are due to the lack of credibility in the text, gnostic texts were written hundreds of years after Christ and by those who never met him, not only this but Enoch cannot be verified because it was written so long ago we can’t test its validity thoroughly. This lends credence to the credibility of the Bible unlike your stupid beliefs

not a single book referenced can be verified, they literally do not exist anymore, the old testament relies on two books we cannot verify.

 

[Reckless Turtle]

How did your parents react when u became Orthodox
Or r u ethiopian?

He's a Paki living in the UK.

 

[Orc]

Im African I know my history you pink skinned faggot with steroid pox marks don’t tell me my fucking history you stupid cunt we willingly converted most of us know which ancestor converted first and it wasn’t by “force” you stupid bitch

so you are brown?

God is the necessary precondition for Y

there is no evidence for god, so you cannot assign anything to it.

@PsychoH learn these arguments and you can shut down any Faggot like Orc
1. “The existence of God must first be proven…”

This claim assumes a particular epistemological stance: that God’s existence must be proven through empirical evidence or logical deduction before any further claims can be entertained. Here’s a possible reply:


• Challenge the Atheist’s Epistemology:

“What kind of proof would you accept for the existence of God? Many theists argue that God, as a transcendent being, may not be subject to empirical verification in the same way material objects are. Philosophical arguments like the Cosmological Argument, Teleological Argument, and the Transcendental Argument for God (TAG) aim to provide rational foundations for belief in God. These arguments aren’t ‘proof’ in a scientific sense but operate on philosophical reasoning, similar to other metaphysical questions like the nature of consciousness or the laws of logic.”


• Counter with TAG
“Without God, how do you account for universal, immaterial, and unchanging concepts like logic, morality, and the uniformity of nature? These are foundational to reasoning itself, and the Christian worldview provides a coherent explanation for their existence.”


GAYtheism is inheritally illogical as it violates 2 of the laws of logic, principle sufficient reason (there’s a reason and first point for everything) and rule of excluded middle (GAYthiestd focus on subjectivity for everything but that’s illogical as you can’t have subjectivity for everything otherwise Epistemology breaks down)

>may not be subject to empirical verification in the same way material objects are.
>These arguments aren’t ‘proof’ in a scientific sense but operate on philosophical reasoning

thanks for demonstrating that your claims are horse shit.

 

[LancasteR]

you pink skinned faggot with steroid pox marks

Nahh this one was too harsh.

 

[LiL 369]

Im African I know my history you pink skinned faggot with steroid pox marks don’t tell me my fucking history you stupid cunt we willingly converted most of us know which ancestor converted first and it wasn’t by “force” you stupid bitch

During European colonization africans were forced to adopt Christianity as part of cultural and religious subjugation (Portuguese and spanish for the most part)... Nothing new here. Come on man how can u even believe what u just said... Africans had their own beliefs and practices, so as they saw themselves being oppressed they just decided to "willingly" adopt the belief of their opressors? doesnt even make sense.