
irlgreycel
Iron
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2024
- Posts
- 194
- Reputation
- 96
What is better for muscle and bone growth?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Ok I will look into CJC, I honestly only was wanting LR3 since I saw it for cheaper, but I may look into replacing LR3 with CJC. Thank you for your effort comment btw.I can explain what each one does if you really want. But I’ll just TL;DR here. I’ll take it you know what they are and their mechanisms.
Neither will change your bone length for one. And the bone density gains are super slow and marginal if you care about them.
People really get too hyperfixated on trying to reinvent the wheel. Test, GH, and some var, if you want, is going to be almost entirely the effect. If you haven’t got that nailed in, the returns of both of them are just diminishing.
I would say CJC is the best cost:benefit. You also get a once a week pin with almost no sides. LR3 you should only reserve for small little blasts for like a month or something. Maybe post-cycle bridging, or a stubborn lagging body part mesocycle? CJC is 95% of LR3 unless you prefer daily pins, glucose monitoring, more hypos, more money spent for maybe 1kg extra LBM.
All good, son!Ok I will look into CJC, I honestly only was wanting LR3 since I saw it for cheaper, but I may look into replacing LR3 with CJC. Thank you for your effort comment btw.