Clarification on the rules.

0hMan

0hMan

germano-gaelic gaunche - modcel
Staff
Joined
Dec 29, 2022
Posts
4,166
Reputation
9,191
It seems there are some confusion on the rules, so us folks at the mod team decided we're going to try to help you guys understand.

Here are some parts of .org's rules that users seem to not understand.

  • Racebaiting is not allowed on the forum.
    • For whatever reason, users seem to not understand this. To clarify, racebaiting is not simply racist banter, or racial slurs. Racebaiting thread topics include but are not limited to:
      • Spamming of interracial porn to prove a point.
      • Spamming about how "BBC" or "BWC" is cucking everyone everywhere, with nothing else added.
      • Spamming about how certain races of women are sluts for men outside their race, with nothing else added.
      • Spamming memes about aforementioned things, with nothing else added.
      • Spamming how someone is "Built for BBC"
      • Basically anything made to pit users against each other on the basis of race.
      • Articles or fake news posted for the simple purpose of eliciting a reaction.
      • Posts like "BBC Bull beats up pussy white guy", "White guy beats up submissive Asian guy", you get the idea. Fight videos/posts to elicit reactions.
    • Racebait, however, is not:
      • Posting actual studies of women's preferences.
      • Racial slurs, etc.
      • Racist joke posts.
      • IQ studies.
      • Any form of study, etc.
      • Doing all of the above yet at the same time not exaggerating, saying stuff like "it's over for all ytbois" etc.
  • LGBT content is not allowed on the forum.
    • This one, again, is seeing a resurgence, which many are (rightfully) disgusted by, as it is against the forum rules. LGBT threads/posts include but are not limited to:
      • Talking about wanting a boyfriend.
      • Talking about being gay/bi/trans, etc.
      • Posting uncensored gay porn with no punchline.
      • Posting about how males are "built to get fucked", etc.
      • Posting MTF troons and saying "it's not gay" to deflect. Yes it is, in fact, gay.
      • Crossdressing.
      • Posting nude content of yourself in attempts to elicit a sexual reaction.
      • Lesbian porn, stuff like strap-on stuff.
      • Encouraging homosexuality & defending it.
    • LGBT content, however, is not:
      • Jokingly calling another man sexy.
      • Saying you wished like a male model.
      • Doing looksmaxxes that might be considered "gay", like wearing makeup.
      • Saying a member is good looking, not to the point of extremity.
      • Posting women that might identify as male or non-binary, yet are still biologically female and can pass as such fairly easily.
      • Talking about wanting any sort of woman, nonetheless of her sexuality.
      • Two girls kissing.
      • Discussing gay people, without being gay itself.
We are being stricter with these sorts of things, and are beginning to issue heavier warnings as time progresses.

We encourage users to report threads under the criteria when they see them, feel free to even PM me posts.

I'm going to keep this thread unlocked for a little bit so you guys can give some ideas on other rules we should clarify, & criteria I should add.

Thank you for reading! :)
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: nigkook, Lux, Prince88 and 59 others
Wtf why?

The only value I bring is BBC propaganda jfl

What will I do now? Post high iq threads?

Please dont do this I beg of you
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • So Sad
Reactions: nigkook, Prince88, Skywalker and 46 others
@thecel @Aloha are in trouble!
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: nigkook, aspiringexcel, SubhumanCurrycel and 3 others
Do not:
  • Post private PMs or information of other users
    • Doxing or threatening to dox someone is prohibited, and applies to users outside the community as well.
  • Mass-tag users
  • Spam
  • Racebait
  • Impersonate
  • Advertise (without permission)
  • Post low-effort or LBGTQ content
 
  • +1
Reactions: nigkook, LooksmaxxHopeful, niqfan625 and 4 others
These rules always existed or are they recent?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003 and thecel
These rules always existed or are they recent?
They have always existed, but mods have been a little *ahem* cucked as late. That's changing however. The reactionary-fascist state of .org has risen! :lul:
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: enchanted_elixir, niqfan625, Deleted member 16673 and 11 others
how is saying a femboy is built to be fucked, gay. the most masculine niggas usually say that online.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
how is saying a femboy is built to be fucked, gay. the most masculine niggas usually say that online.
Oh, well let me try to explain.
When a guy wants to fuck a guy, that's called homosexuality!
Eric Wareheim Mind Blown GIF by Tim and Eric
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, Av0nr, TechnoBoss and 11 others
Oh, well let me try to explain.
When a guy wants to fuck a guy, that's called homosexuality!
Eric Wareheim Mind Blown GIF by Tim and Eric
but that's not saying you want to fuck a guy, that's just saying they look like a women who would get fucked. Ngl idk how you don't understand that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
We are being stricter with these sorts of things, and are beginning to issue heavier warnings as time progresses.
How retroactive is it?
Can I just search through someone's post history for this and nuke their account?
Threads can be bumped, for example, so time "progressing" could be an issue.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, Lookologist003, thecel and 1 other person
How retroactive is it?
Can I just search through someone's post history for this and nuke their account?
That's a fair point. The rule has always been in place, but the rule of thumb as mod when warning is when somebody posts content that goes against the rules, we warn the most recent ones, and usually don't delete older ones unless they're being actively bumped. However, you can send me PMs of content you think breaks the rules, and I'll delete them now.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lookologist003, thecel and ranierean
but that's not saying you want to fuck a guy, that's just saying they look like a women who would get fucked. Ngl idk how you don't understand that.
When a guy wants to fuck a guy, even when a guy looks like a woman, that's called homosexuality!
Eric Wareheim Mind Blown GIF by Tim and Eric
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, JustShower, emeraldglass and 3 others
When a guy wants to fuck a guy, even when a guy looks like a woman, that's called homosexuality!
Eric Wareheim Mind Blown GIF by Tim and Eric
so just didn't read what i said, it's saying the guy looks like a girl nothing about wanting to fuck a guy
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel
Posting women that might identify as male or non-binary, yet are still biologically female and can pass as such fairly easily.
Huh
 
so just didn't read what i said, it's saying the guy looks like a girl nothing about wanting to fuck a guy
When a guy wants to fuck a guy, even when a guy looks like a woman, that's called homosexuality!
Eric Wareheim Mind Blown GIF by Tim and Eric
The next post you post trying to peddle homosexuality will be warned for LGBT content.
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
  • WTF
Reactions: Av0nr, emeraldglass, Lookologist003 and 3 others
I broke literally every rule in the lgbtq section
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 33757, Samsepioler and St.TikTokcel
Biological women. As in, women who were born with vaginas.
Some women cut their hair short and say they're a man.
It doesn't make them a man.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and Fiqh
Fair in all honestly and I'm glad you guys are clarifying in more detail

Problem was before it was nebulous and not clear

I'm not mad about the warning you gave me it was earned. I was mainly acting in accordance with what I saw being condoned

Same for the thread of me that got deleted although I'd say it wasn't to elicit reaction. I had some other pictures here that are censored I posted mainly for discussion of klinefelters not arousal

I think you'll find me to be surprisingly compliant now that the extent of the rules have been expanded upon. You can't really blame me for before when you guys didn't enforce or make things clear
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Woah
Reactions: Gengar, emeraldglass, Lookologist003 and 7 others
So now the mods hate gays but think it's gay to think a man who dresses like a women looks like a man. Ban me all you want but that just sounds gay from you tbh
 
You can't really blame me for before when you guys didn't enforce or make things clear
Who the hell was talking to you? This thread isn't about you.
 
  • JFL
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, Deleted member 41749, Av0nr and 5 others
So now the mods hate gays but think it's gay to think a man who dresses like a women looks like a man. Ban me all you want but that just sounds gay from you tbh
What? A man who dresses like a woman looks like a man, correct. Nobody's arguing that.
 
i mean it is for all users isn't it
 
What is the “pedophilia” policy.

We can like teens but not little kids?
 
  • JFL
Reactions: yeeyeeslayer
Funny how homosexuality is banned but not ephebophilia...
 
What? A man who dresses like a woman looks like a man, correct. Nobody's arguing that.
I'm against transgenderism, you can't change gender
 
Funny how homosexuality is banned but not ephebophilia...
lmao you want us to be banned for being attracted to women legal in most 1st world countries
 
Funny how homosexuality is banned but not ephebophilia...
Why would it be? Why would saying teens are attractive be banned, I'm a teen myself, would I not be able to like teens?
What is the “pedophilia” policy.

We can like teens but not little kids?
That's a slippery slope I suppose. I don't really understand the minimum for warning and whatnot so I won't speak on what I don't know, but obviously you can't post CP or anything like that.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful
Why would it be? Why would saying teens are attractive be banned, I'm a teen myself, would I not be able to like teens?

That's a slippery slope I suppose. I don't really understand the minimum for warning and whatnot so I won't speak on what I don't know, but obviously you can't post CP or anything like that.
if it's gay CP do you get double banned
 
That's a slippery slope I suppose. I don't really understand the minimum for warning and whatnot so I won't speak on what I don't know, but obviously you can't post CP or anything like that.
Yeah I think you are on the right track. None of us JBmaxxers are spamming CP
 
  • +1
Reactions: yeeyeeslayer and 0hMan
Funny how a pinned thread is because of my thread wanting to ban the fags :ROFLMAO:
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful and yeeyeeslayer
Yes, I agree. Weren't you saying earlier that wanting to fuck a guy who's feminine isn't gay though?
that's never what i said tho, it's making fun of a guy for looking like a faggot. Not actually wanting to fuck them. Like if you said Meeks got abused in prison, you would be making the joke cause he looks like a fag pretty boy not cause you're attracted to him.
 
Yeah I think you are on the right track. None of us JBmaxxers are spamming CP
Ironically, the only instances of CP I've seen posted were by racebaiters. Which is partially why I want to start actively getting harder on these people.

But still, please avoid posting super young girls. It puts the forum in a bad light.

Funny how a pinned thread is because of my thread wanting to ban the fags :ROFLMAO:
No, we've been talking about this for some time now. I just got the OK from master now.

that's never what i said tho, it's making fun of a guy for looking like a faggot. Not actually wanting to fuck them. Like if you said Meeks got abused in prison, you would be making the joke cause he looks like a fag pretty boy not cause you're attracted to him.
No, that would be allowed.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Gengar and Lookologist003
  • +1
Reactions: 0hMan
But still, please avoid posting super young girls. It puts the forum in a bad light.
Ok fine, I will be a good goy
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: yeeyeeslayer and 0hMan
Ok fine, I will be a good goy
Thank you. You have to understand how this looks on our end if we let stuff like this up on the forum. It leads to a very slippery and steep slope.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful
Thank you. You have to understand how this looks on our end if we let stuff like this up on the forum. It leads to a very slippery and steep slope.
Yeah I get it. Just take it easy on me I’ll try to keep it cool.
 
  • +1
Reactions: 0hMan
Yes it is, u just judge it for 1 area which is meant to be in a mythological format so that children may grasp an understanding of a much more complex creation myth, both are true.
No, it's not. End of discussion.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Banasura
Why would it be? Why would saying teens are attractive be banned, I'm a teen myself, would I not be able to like teens?
I agree I just find it a bit weird when grown men here are talkin about 15-19 yo girls but idk maybe it's nothing
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Sprinkles and kebab
I agree I just find it a bit weird when grown men here are talkin about 15-19 yo girls but idk maybe it's nothing
It's legal in most countries, and girls look the best in their late teens admittedly. Can't really blame them.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, Deleted member 32973, Aladin and 1 other person
I agree I just find it a bit weird when grown men here are talkin about 15-19 yo girls but idk maybe it's nothing
how can you be weird out about grown men talking about women they can legally fuck.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 33757 and 0hMan
As a matter of fact isn't the whole forum built around younger women and saying older women are chad used sluts.
 
  • JFL
Reactions: LooksmaxxHopeful, Deleted member 32973 and wsada
I agree I just find it a bit weird when grown men here are talkin about 15-19 yo girls but idk maybe it's nothing
it is
 
  • +1
Reactions: wsada

Similar threads

glizzygnasher68
Replies
4
Views
256
aryan mogger
aryan mogger
i_love_roosters
Replies
100
Views
2K
noobs
noobs
Edgarpill
Replies
10
Views
376
Ruthless
Ruthless
Falcon_Flam
Replies
107
Views
5K
castizo_ascender
castizo_ascender

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top