Class solidarity has to be the most retarded leftist cope

[wishIwasSalludon]

It will never exist it’s impossible in a multicultural society at least.

In the Soviet Union they had to erase other cultures en masse because they kept fighting eachother.

And these were all white Eastern Europeans with relatively similar cultures.

Do you really think that poor Arabs, poor blacks, poor Latinos and poor whites would ever unite against the ruling class

Bro the left legit lives in a fantasy world

Even in a homogenous society it is still pretty much impossible because of human nature.

That’s why you don’t see japs or Koreans rebelling against their ruling classes.

@imontheloose

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

0

 

[Jason Voorhees]

The only class I care about is white girls and non human girls

 

[imontheloose]

Some universities have a literal Marxist society.

“If you want to stand up against evil, come join us!”

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

The only class I care about is white girls and non human girls

I think blud might like white women

 

[imontheloose]

The only class I care about is white girls and non human girls

Any progress on getting your cupcake?

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Some universities have a literal Marxist society.

“If you want to stand up against evil, come join us!”
View attachment 4138941

The reality is that people are inherently different.

East Asian societies are entirely homogeneous and yet their poor hasn’t done anything against the elites screwing them over.

The Greeks believed that some people were by their very nature meant to be slaves and some masters.

The more I study the Greeks the more I realize how right they were about so much stuff. Egalitarianism is one of the biggest memes that came out of the “enlightenment”

 

[Jason Voorhees]

Some universities have a literal Marxist society.

“If you want to stand up against evil, come join us!”
View attachment 4138941

My uni had a Bajrang Dal. Just google what they are and I had the same reaction @Chadeep @browncurrycel

 

[FiendFiend]

It will never exist it’s impossible in a multicultural society at least.

In the Soviet Union they had to erase other cultures en masse because they kept fighting eachother.

And these were all white Eastern Europeans with relatively similar cultures.

Do you really think that poor Arabs, poor blacks, poor Latinos and poor whites would ever unite against the ruling class

Bro the left legit lives in a fantasy world

Even in a homogenous society it is still pretty much impossible because of human nature.

That’s why you don’t see japs or Koreans rebelling against their ruling classes.

@imontheloose

politics that aren't to do with race (shit that actually effects ur life)

 

[thereallegend]

The reality is that people are inherently different.

East Asian societies are entirely homogeneous and yet their poor hasn’t done anything against the elites screwing them over.

The Greeks believed that some people were by their very nature meant to be slaves and some masters.

The more I study the Greeks the more I realize how right they were about so much stuff. Egalitarianism is one of the biggest memes that came out of the “enlightenment”

What do you make of the People's Republic of China? It's ruled by a Communist Party that rapidly industrialized the country.

 

[imontheloose]

The reality is that people are inherently different.

East Asian societies are entirely homogeneous and yet their poor hasn’t done anything against the elites screwing them over.

The Greeks believed that some people were by their very nature meant to be slaves and some masters.

The more I study the Greeks the more I realize how right they were about so much stuff. Egalitarianism is one of the biggest memes that came out of the “enlightenment”

Inequality is the truth.

 

[imontheloose]

What do you make of the People's Republic of China? It's ruled by a Communist Party that rapidly industrialized the country.

Not as a consequence of Mao.

 

[imontheloose]

My uni had a Bajrang Dal. Just google what they are and I had the same reaction @Chadeep @browncurrycel

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

What do you make of the People's Republic of China? It's ruled by a Communist Party that rapidly industrialized the country.

Millions of them had to die in order to even make an attempt to achieve the egalitarian Marxist dream and even then they still ended up a pseudo capitalist country where the elites cuck the working classes.

Which is what elites do in every society.

 

[thereallegend]

Was thinking about this earlier today. The amount of times my coworkers have thrown me under the bus is astounding. But at the same time you can see collective bargaining aka unionization is literally as valuable as a college degree. Unionized workers make $1m more over the course their career compared to their non union counterparts.

 

[thereallegend]

Millions of them had to die in order to even make an attempt to achieve the egalitarian Marxist dream and even then they still ended up a pseudo capitalist country where the elites cuck the working classes.

Which is what elites do in every society.

Excuse me, what "elites" are there in China?

 

[thereallegend]

Not as a consequence of Mao.

Mao still won the Civil War against Chang Kai Shek the Fascists from Japan.

 

[imontheloose]

Mao still won the Civil War against Chang Kai Shek the Fascists from Japan.

Winning a war doesn’t mean your ideology is better or more useful.

 

[Gonthar]

Do you really think that poor Arabs, poor blacks, poor Latinos and poor whites would ever unite against the ruling class

A poor Arab has more things in common with a poor black or Latino, than with a rich oil sheikh for example, they live in completely different worlds....

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Excuse me, what "elites" are there in China?

the government. I know China claims to be democratic but it really isn’t.

It’s an insanely nepotistic society. Corruption is so normalized that they have a term for it and you’re expected to participate in it. I forgot what they call it.

They also have billionaires but they’re subject to the government unlike how it is in the west.

China right now is a far cry from what the revolutionaries had in mind

 

[thereallegend]

Winning a war doesn’t mean your ideology is better or more useful.

Yes it does. Might is right.

 

[imontheloose]

Yes it does. Might is right.

A war isn’t won on ideology. If an African tribe pillages and rapes an entire city elsewhere, that tribe’s ideology isn’t automatically better than said city’s.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Was thinking about this earlier today. The amount of times my coworkers have thrown me under the bus is astounding. But at the same time you can see collective bargaining aka unionization is literally as valuable as a college degree. Unionized workers make $1m more over the course their career compared to their non union counterparts.

It’s genuinely baffling that a significant amount of working classes people on the right think that unions are bad for them

 

[thereallegend]

the government. I know China claims to be democratic but it really isn’t.

It’s an insanely nepotistic society. Corruption is so normalized that they have a term for it and you’re expected to participate in it. I forgot what they call it.

They also have billionaires but they’re subject to the government unlike how it is in the west.

China right now is a far cry from what the revolutionaries had in mind

China is more democratic than the West.

That's what confused me. The communists aren't the "elites" in China. The elites were the Western imperialists controlling China in the Century of Humiliation. The Chinese people defeated these people via War time communism. They killed the landlords with brute force, good riddance.

 

[thereallegend]

A war isn’t won on ideology. If an African tribe pillages and rapes an entire city elsewhere, that tribe’s ideology isn’t automatically better than said city’s.

Yes, it does. If your ideology doesn't include defending your own borders, then what the fuck is that?

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

Yes, it does. If your ideology doesn't include defending your own borders, then what the fuck is that?

This is just an example of the just world fallacy. The world doesn’t care about what’s “right”.

Germanics sacked Rome, but that doesn’t prove their ideology was superior.

Wars are won based on leadership, resources, man power, geography and luck not based on what’s right.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

China is more democratic than the West.

Considering that public support has 0 impact on what becomes a law in the US that’s not particularly a grand achievement

Study: Congress literally doesn’t care what you think

I had no idea how bad things actually were until I saw one simple graph.

act.represent.us

Its still far from being ideal just not as bad I guess.

 

[imontheloose]

Yes, it does. If your ideology doesn't include defending your own borders, then what the fuck is that?

What the fuck are you talking about? Why are you still a naturecel after all these years? Man power doesn’t prove supremacy of ideology. Appeal to force / argumentum ad baculum is retarded (“because I can hit you, I’m correct”). That’s a threat; not proof, and it’s logically worthless.

Read Ivan Arreguin-Toft’s research on asymmetric wars. Weak sides can and do win when they avoid the strong side’s preferred fight. Might doesn’t prove you’re right nor even guarantee a win; in fact, they historically lose when they use your logic.

If you were right, the most fervent would always win. They don’t. Sustainment, production, and adaptive strategy beats zeal.

 

[wishIwasSalludon]

What the fuck are you talking about? Why are you still a naturecel after all these years? Man power doesn’t prove supremacy of ideology. Appeal to force / argumentum ad baculum is retarded (“because I can hit you, I’m correct”). That’s a threat; not proof, and it’s logically worthless.

Read Ivan Arreguin-Toft’s research on asymmetric wars. Weak sides can and do win when they avoid the strong side’s preferred fight. Might doesn’t prove you’re right nor even guarantee a win; in fact, they historically lose when they use your logic.

If you were right, the most fervent would always win. They don’t. Sustainment, production, and adaptive strategy beats zeal.

The whole idea seems to be self defeating when you remember that the prevailing belief after millennia of human conflict was that might != right.

 

[imontheloose]

The whole idea seems to be self defeating when you remember that the prevailing belief after millennia of human conflict was that might != right.

It’s naturecel cope. That guy has been a naturecel for years now. I remember him briefly in 2022.

 

[thereallegend]

This is just an example of the just world fallacy. The world doesn’t care about what’s “right”.

Germanics sacked Rome, but that doesn’t prove their ideology was superior.

Wars are won based on leadership, resources, man power, geography and luck not based on what’s right.

Germanic ideology was all about nature and paganism. Those fuckers were 6'4 from drinking blood and eating raw meat. Hell yeah, that way of life is superior to the grain sludge Romans were eating.

 

[thereallegend]

What the fuck are you talking about? Why are you still a naturecel after all these years? Man power doesn’t prove supremacy of ideology. Appeal to force / argumentum ad baculum is retarded (“because I can hit you, I’m correct”). That’s a threat; not proof, and it’s logically worthless.

Read Ivan Arreguin-Toft’s research on asymmetric wars. Weak sides can and do win when they avoid the strong side’s preferred fight. Might doesn’t prove you’re right nor even guarantee a win; in fact, they historically lose when they use your logic.

If you were right, the most fervent would always win. They don’t. Sustainment, production, and adaptive strategy beats zeal.

Political power flows from the barrel of a gun.

Technically the way Mao won WAS asymmetric warfare. They implemented guerilla tactics.

I agree with the feminists. Their saying is that the it isn't the survival of the strongest, but survival of the fittest. That's what I mean by "might is right".

 

[thereallegend]

Weak sides can and do win when they avoid the strong side’s preferred fight.

That's true. I see it American football. If an inferior running team can control time of possession and make tackles on defense, they can beat beat superior passing offenses. They usually can win by a field goal.

 

[gimmedatacc]

The only class I care about is white girls +

not for you ethnic worm