Classism + eugenics is necessary

Frogooboi

Frogooboi

6’0 7.5”
Joined
Jan 16, 2025
Posts
578
Reputation
586
Only smart people should be allowed to vote. The smartest should be forced to have kids with waiters, they don’t have to have sex or live each other, just sperm donation from smart men to smart women.

Also governments like Canada and America should have sectors with only people above 6’4 allowed so we can breed taller athletes. In North America there is a lot of sports where being tall is an advantage, and they bring in a lot of money, so there is no point for the government to not try this.

Also people who can pass on genes to make disabled children shouldn’t be able to reproduce either. I’m not saying kill all disabled people currently alive, but they don’t provide much value so breeding more is just wasting extra resources.

TLDR: water eugenics takes
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Love it
Reactions: daiseee, Bars, WrothEnd and 4 others
Only smart people should be allowed to vote. The smartest should be forced to have kids with waiters, they don’t have to have sex or live each other, just sperm donation from smart men to smart women.

Also governments like Canada and America should have sectors with only people above 6’4 allowed so we can breed taller athletes. In North America there is a lot of sports where being tall is an advantage, and they bring in a lot of money, so there is no point for the government to not try this.

Also people who can pass on genes to make disabled children shouldn’t be able to reproduce either. I’m not saying kill all disabled people currently alive, but they don’t provide much value so breeding more is just wasting extra resources.

TLDR: water eugenics takes
While you type this dalits multiply
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • So Sad
Reactions: Gaia262, daiseee, Bars and 2 others
You can just castrate yourself and do your part in this
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible, XtrovertNTnormalfag, daiseee and 2 others
while ik this is larp, i do agree there should be some form of intelllect based voting. This could jsut be ur vote counts if u pass the test beofre ur voting it doesnt have to be complex
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: registerfasterusing
while ik this is larp, i do agree there should be some form of intelllect based voting. This could jsut be ur vote counts if u pass the test beofre ur voting it doesnt have to be complex
Not larping
 
and the means by which they are enforced is through violence and or threat of violence(which must be backed up by demonstrations of real ability and willingness to commit violence)

all roads lead to violence. violence is literally beautiful and highly ethical, this is why it's all around us, present in film, videogames, the sports and competitions we engage in, violence has simply been hijacked by treasonous jews and their boomer collaborators towards dysgenic ends.

make violence eugenic again
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi
make violence eugenic again
Eventually it won’t even be violent because the goal will be achieved and since everyone will become hiq they will all understand the need for eugenics
 
while ik this is larp, i do agree there should be some form of intelllect based voting. This could jsut be ur vote counts if u pass the test beofre ur voting it doesnt have to be complex
Ngl i disagree. Allowing everyone to vote makes them feel like they are acting agents in society
 
  • +1
Reactions: girthygirt
nevermind i see the rest it wsa just a glitch. I do agree but i do wish there was someway they could do this but the reason itll never be changed is also the reason ill most likely never vote
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi and registerfasterusing
nevermind i see the rest it wsa just a glitch. I do agree but i do wish there was someway they could do this but the reason itll never be changed is also the reason ill most likely never vote
Ngl it doesnt rly matter either way here. Ppl js pick a side and associate themselves with it so they feel like theyre apart of smth, they have someone who tells them what to do and what to think. And also another side that they can criticize and blame for their problems.

Honestly in an ideal system u allocate decision making to local communities to force ppl to actually make decisions on their own
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi and girthygirt
Ngl it doesnt rly matter either way here. Ppl js pick a side and associate themselves with it so they feel like theyre apart of smth, they have someone who tells them what to do and what to think. And also another side that they can criticize and blame for their problems.

Honestly in an ideal system u allocate decision making to local communities to force ppl to actually make decisions on their own
Or I wish they would make sure they are educated on the politicians, or their ideologues, before casting their vote, but still, it seems very unrealistic
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
Honestly in an ideal system u allocate decision making to local communities to force ppl to actually make decisions on their own
I think a lot of problems would get fixed if they got rid of elections for choosing a side and just had both at once. Then you could for the person you want to represent the different positions at each side
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
I think a lot of problems would get fixed if they got rid of elections for choosing a side and just had both at once. Then you could for the person you want to represent the different positions at each side
I think it’s honestly better to have ppl vote on decisions themselves rather than ppl they want to make them. It could kinda js serve as a replacement if framed ideologically, however there are ways to combat that. When ppl vote for a person that individual immediately becomes an image, a face in which they can place their trust and endorsement. It prevents ppl from actually confronting the decisions in society
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi
Or I wish they would make sure they are educated on the politicians, or their ideologues, before casting their vote, but still, it seems very unrealistic
Why do u think so?
 
  • +1
Reactions: girthygirt
the unrealistic-ness of it ?
No, why do u think ppl should be educated on who they are voting for? And what would qualify as education
 
  • +1
Reactions: girthygirt
Only smart people should be allowed to vote. The smartest should be forced to have kids with waiters, they don’t have to have sex or live each other, just sperm donation from smart men to smart women.

Also governments like Canada and America should have sectors with only people above 6’4 allowed so we can breed taller athletes. In North America there is a lot of sports where being tall is an advantage, and they bring in a lot of money, so there is no point for the government to not try this.

Also people who can pass on genes to make disabled children shouldn’t be able to reproduce either. I’m not saying kill all disabled people currently alive, but they don’t provide much value so breeding more is just wasting extra resources.

TLDR: water eugenics takes
See people will say this type of thing but, they still THEMSELVES want to spread their genes even if they don't match a specific criteria.

Also, what makes you think the world is not already run by the smartest/most powerful people? You want people to have illusion of choice to control them.
 
No, why do u think ppl should be educated on who they are voting for? And what would qualify as education
just maybe 3 short questions like what party, one of their policies, and their vice president. Just super easy questions to make sure they didnt just see one article about why they should vote for them andd followed through
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
just maybe 3 short questions like what party, one of their policies, and their vice president. Just super easy questions to make sure they didnt just see one article about why they should vote for them andd followed through
Yeah but obv this wont happen cuz it will reduce number of voters

Also what do u think of this:

I think it’s honestly better to have ppl vote on decisions themselves rather than ppl they want to make them. It could kinda js serve as a replacement if framed ideologically, however there are ways to combat that. When ppl vote for a person that individual immediately becomes an image, a face in which they can place their trust and endorsement. It prevents ppl from actually confronting the decisions in society
 
  • +1
Reactions: girthygirt
See people will say this type of thing but, they still THEMSELVES want to spread their genes even if they don't match a specific criteria.

Also, what makes you think the world is not already run by the smartest/most powerful people? You want people to have illusion of choice to control them.
I don’t have aspirations to spread my nut cuz it’s unrealistic since I’m ugly. I also don’t really want kids anyway the only good thing about having a baby is breastmilk
 
Yeah but obv this wont happen cuz it will reduce number of voters

Also what do u think of this:
sounds like a good idea but still i think that would also reduce voters and neither of these would be welcomed
 
  • +1
Reactions: registerfasterusing
sounds like a good idea but still i think that would also reduce voters and neither of these would be welcomed
Yeah obv that will never happen in the US or probably not in any western country. But i believe there is a system like this in Rojava for example
 
  • +1
Reactions: girthygirt
Genetics are pretty random, there is a reason why previous attempts at large scale eugenics have failed. The only way to improve genetics is via gene editing, which has it's own risks currently.
 
  • +1
Reactions: psychomandible and registerfasterusing
Yeah obv that will never happen in the US or probably not in any western country. But i believe there is a system like this in Rojava for example
yeah any place jews have control over i doubt the voting system will ever change
 
  • Love it
  • JFL
Reactions: Frogooboi and registerfasterusing
nah it was a joke but i do doubt the voting system will ever change in the Western countries for at least a while
I dont see it ever changing tbh
 
  • +1
Reactions: girthygirt
See people will say this type of thing but, they still THEMSELVES want to spread their genes even if they don't match a specific criteria.

Also, what makes you think the world is not already run by the smartest/most powerful people? You want people to have illusion of choice to control them.
you can tell it's not run by the best by looking at who the "best" are, a bunch of dysgenic jews and boomers. also comparing it to other eras where conditions were significantly better in the areas that mattered the most. purchasing power, housing availability, living space, demographics, and other quality of life measures.

all sensible people will gladly go extinct to make way for better people. if i don't qualify, good. this means in my place a better person will exist instead. this is beautiful and glorious. this is what you solipsistic bug insects don't understand.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Frogooboi
all sensible people will gladly go extinct to make way for better people. if i don't qualify, good. this means in my place a better person will exist instead. this is beautiful and glorious. this is what you solipsistic bug insects don't understand.
 
Genetics are pretty random, there is a reason why previous attempts at large scale eugenics have failed. The only way to improve genetics is via gene editing, which has it's own risks currently.
No sweden succeeded
 
  • +1
Reactions: MiserableMan
Iq based voting is stupid
 
Arabs are the top tier
 

Similar threads

Zagro
Replies
32
Views
447
Zagro
Zagro
Sihveri
Replies
4
Views
136
Frogooboi
Frogooboi
D
Replies
33
Views
360
ForestRotter
ForestRotter
TrueNateJacobs
Replies
42
Views
279
iblamexyz
iblamexyz
D
Replies
33
Views
283
DaggosHardBrawler
D

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top