eduardkoopman
Kraken
- Joined
- Aug 29, 2019
- Posts
- 22,732
- Reputation
- 28,477
"suggesting that both Attire [aka clothing] and Group Size do not strongly impact on male attractiveness"
"Our predictions regarding positive associations between attractiveness and economic status in male targets were supported, but only in males presented in business clothes and not casual attire."
"Our findings suggest that, the influence of status-related clothing on judgments of attractiveness among women and men may be less robust than previously reported."
study source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437035/#!po=23.3333
pictures used: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click on image to zoom&p=PMC3&id=6437035_fpsyg-10-00462-g003.jpg
************************************************************************************************************************************
Another study from 30 years ago:
"Results indicated that
a male stranger dressed in the daring style was considered unattractive, not intelligent, but very popular;
a male stranger formally dressed was considered attractive, intelligent, and popular;
a male stranger casually dressed was viewed as unattractive, not intelligent, and not popular; and
a male stranger conservatively dressed was seen as attractive and intelligent but not popular.
Respondents with high clothing interest rated the conservatively dressed male stranger as more sociable than the stranger dressed in the daring and casual styles and preferred the formally dressed stranger."
So, I guess. Dressing daring or casucally is the worse one out there.
Study: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247783413_Adult's_Perception_of_Male_Garment_Styles
"Our predictions regarding positive associations between attractiveness and economic status in male targets were supported, but only in males presented in business clothes and not casual attire."
"Our findings suggest that, the influence of status-related clothing on judgments of attractiveness among women and men may be less robust than previously reported."
study source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6437035/#!po=23.3333
pictures used: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/core/lw/2.0/html/tileshop_pmc/tileshop_pmc_inline.html?title=Click on image to zoom&p=PMC3&id=6437035_fpsyg-10-00462-g003.jpg
************************************************************************************************************************************
Another study from 30 years ago:
"Results indicated that
a male stranger dressed in the daring style was considered unattractive, not intelligent, but very popular;
a male stranger formally dressed was considered attractive, intelligent, and popular;
a male stranger casually dressed was viewed as unattractive, not intelligent, and not popular; and
a male stranger conservatively dressed was seen as attractive and intelligent but not popular.
Respondents with high clothing interest rated the conservatively dressed male stranger as more sociable than the stranger dressed in the daring and casual styles and preferred the formally dressed stranger."
So, I guess. Dressing daring or casucally is the worse one out there.
Study: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247783413_Adult's_Perception_of_Male_Garment_Styles
Last edited: