Cold winters theory purposes the reason why caucasians are more handsome however I see a flaw with more colder being better.

[reptiles]

1.if the hypothesis were true we would expect a couple things to be true

1. We would expect those from around the world to have very good bone structure if they came from a colder climate.
2 we would need to prove that cold climates create lighter skins.
3 we should be able to see in similarity in skull structure between those who evolved in a caucus like Manor.


However 1 nepalese men especially those from really cold climates have quite reccessed bone structure then what we expect to find had the hypothsis been true.


2 we see browner skin in nepealese men suggesting lighter skin has less environmental factors and more of a genetic role a good possibility is light skinned spawned from interbreeding with modern day homosapien and neatherthal causing lighter skin shades of humans.
3the skull structures is very different from what we expect to find had the cold winters been true.

If a trait is gained by colder climates we would expect such a thing to be true in all colder climates as that trait would be useful.


However from what we see this does not appear true in nepealese men suggesting this hypothesis is most likely wrong

 

[fukmylyf]

dn

 

[reptiles]

dn

Brutal

 

[SMVbender]

Good bone structure? Blacks and meds have that also. Keep it with skin color.

 

[Deleted]

Good bone structure? Blacks and meds have that also. Keep it with skin color.

They are (usually) more rounded and less angular

 

[reptiles]

Good bone structure? Blacks and meds have that also. Keep it with skin color.

Most blacks are known to have bimaxillary protrusion sometimes asians as well

They are (usually) more rounded and less angular

So what causes caucausses to be more lucky we can see a similar evolutionary trend within nepal yet they have bug eyes and browner skin

 

[SixFootManlet]

That theory is BS.

The original inhabitants of the coldest habitable areas on the planet -- Alaska, Greenland, Canada's Northern Territory & Nunavut, and Russia's Siberia -- are inuits, eskimos, and sami, not caucasians. Caucasians are from the caucasus area - as the word obviously suggests.

Caucasus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

See:

Circumpolar peoples - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[reptiles]

That theory is BS.

The original inhabitants of the coldest habitable areas on the planet -- Alaska, Greenland, Canada's Northern Territory & Nunavut, and Russia's Siberia -- are inuits, eskimos, and sami, not caucasians. Caucasians are from the caucasus area - as the word obviously suggests.

Caucasus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

See:

Circumpolar peoples - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Yeah I'm seeing holes with it so what allowed those from the cauccauses to be seen as so sexy?

 

[Amnesia]

Lol @ this nonsense

It's just cause God loves white people more and created them more attractive. Roman letters describe Jesus has having blue eyes and light hair and ruddy cheeks. God Himself came down as a white male

 

[SixFootManlet]

Yeah I'm seeing holes with it so what allowed those from the cauccauses to be seen as so sexy?

Colonization. Indians would be seen as sexy too had they raped and pillaged half the world.

While angular features have always been seen as attractive - the preference for light skin color specifically is mostly a socially-influenced trait. Same with preference for western-culture.

Lol @ this nonsense

It's just cause God loves white people more and created them more attractive. Roman letters describe Jesus has having blue eyes and light hair and ruddy cheeks. God Himself came down as a white male

Post pics of roman letter.

Jesus was a brown guy with brown hair. The whole blue eyes and blonde hair jesus is an American invention.

You can look at the oldest paintings of jesus in Europe for proof of this:

Depiction of Jesus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

None show them with light eyes or light hair.

 

[TsarTsar444]

I have no idea what you just said

 

[Deleted member 2933]

dn

 

[reptiles]

Lol @ this nonsense

It's just cause God loves white people more and created them more attractive. Roman letters describe Jesus has having blue eyes and light hair and ruddy cheeks. God Himself came down as a white male

God is for low iq morons tbqh

Colonization. Indians would be seen as sexy too had they raped and pillaged half the world.

While angular features have always been seen as attractive - the preference for light skin color specifically is mostly a socially-influenced trait. Same with preference for western-culture.

Post pics of roman letter.

Jesus was a brown guy with brown hair. The whole blue eyes and blonde hair jesus is an American invention.

You can look at the oldest paintings of jesus in Europe for proof of this:

Depiction of Jesus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

None show them with light eyes or light hair.

But certain things minus skin colour are desired yoh can tell a European jaw from a non European its really easy to tell its hard to describe but you can see it very visually

 

[umzazi]

Colonization. Indians would be seen as sexy too had they raped and pillaged half the world.

While angular features have always been seen as attractive - the preference for light skin color specifically is mostly a socially-influenced trait. Same with preference for western-culture.

Post pics of roman letter.

Jesus was a brown guy with brown hair. The whole blue eyes and blonde hair jesus is an American invention.

You can look at the oldest paintings of jesus in Europe for proof of this:

Depiction of Jesus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

None show them with light eyes or light hair.

Be careful of depictions, u missing the point that they are usually meant to be symbolic more than factual. Take for exemple buddha represented as east asian in east asia instead of looking indian caucasoid like he really was: it does not matter for the purpose it served

 

[reptiles]

Be careful of depictions, u missing the point that they are usually meant to be symbolic more than factual. Take for exemple buddha represented as east asian in east asia instead of looking indian caucasoid like he really was: it does not matter for the purpose it served

Jesus was not a white man he was not a black man he wasn't an Asian he was a semite jew from the line of David he was definitely Caucasoid but he certainly wasn't white by modern definitions unless Jews fall into white and Middle Eastern does as well but he certainly wasn't black either.

 

[turkproducer]

Colonization. Indians would be seen as sexy too had they raped and pillaged half the world.

While angular features have always been seen as attractive - the preference for light skin color specifically is mostly a socially-influenced trait. Same with preference for western-culture.

Post pics of roman letter.

Jesus was a brown guy with brown hair. The whole blue eyes and blonde hair jesus is an American invention.

You can look at the oldest paintings of jesus in Europe for proof of this:

Depiction of Jesus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

None show them with light eyes or light hair.

american invention? You mean European jfl


and no, while i do admit the preference for whites and non ethnics is to some extent socially influenced, a lot of it is genetics.

 

[reptiles]

american invention? You mean European jfl


and no, while i do admit the preference for whites and non ethnics is to some extent socially influenced, a lot of it is genetics.

It is but I need a better explanation than cold winters theory cause I have showed very strong problems with it.

The question still stands why does caucaus look so good and others not so.


The impearlaism part merely extend to blue hair and blue eyes and some European jaw ideals never the less certain traits which are universal like a forward grown maxilla a more treating browridge this seems to be. A lacking in asians and especially blacks

 

[SixFootManlet]

God is for low iq morons tbqh




But certain things minus skin colour are desired yoh can tell a European jaw from a non European its really easy to tell its hard to describe but you can see it very visually

Of course you can - the first and most obvious difference is skin color. That's what your eyes notice first.

Jesus was not a white man he was not a black man he wasn't an Asian he was a semite jew from the line of David he was definitely Caucasoid but he certainly wasn't white by modern definitions unless Jews fall into white and Middle Eastern does as well but he certainly wasn't black either.

No one said Jesus was black. But he wasn't some blonde haired, blue eyed religious jock that a lot of Americans love to think.

 

[reptiles]

Of course you can - the first and most obvious difference is skin color. That's what your eyes notice first.

For a normie yeah but to a normie skin colour equals race its why blumanbach considered European white as being solely white. Without accounting for bone structure Charlestown coon even though his work is outdated did do a good job defining what caucasoid skulls had in similar.and that's the browridge and maxilla.

You can tell a caucaus from a non caucaus

 

[SixFootManlet]

Be careful of depictions, u missing the point that they are usually meant to be symbolic more than factual. Take for exemple buddha represented as east asian in east asia instead of looking indian caucasoid like he really was: it does not matter for the purpose it served

Buddha actually had (partly) east asian features. He was born in Lumbini - which is in modern-day Nepal. People from that region have always had a mixture of East Asian and North Indian features.

Lumbini - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[reptiles]

Buddha actually had (partly) east asian features. He was born in Lumbini - which is in modern-day Nepal. People from that region have always had a mixture of East Asian and North Indian features.

Lumbini - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

The aryan migration theory is hugely contested by most scholars today however migration from Eurasian did happen according to Richie.


Their was this 1 study done using GPS sat nav to track gene ancestry and what they found were mainly.


1 Dravidians are actually most likely a admixture of zagros founders looking to expand agriculture and OOA indians.
2 later West Eurasian admixture was also found. But before aryan migration theory.
3 the breeding occurred asi and ani most likely in the godavari river.
In other words we're mainly caucasoids contrary to popular beliefs.
Look at albinos from India vast majority look slav or middle eastern passing

 

[umzazi]

Jesus was not a white man he was not a black man he wasn't an Asian he was a semite jew from the line of David he was definitely Caucasoid but he certainly wasn't white by modern definitions unless Jews fall into white and Middle Eastern does as well but he certainly wasn't black either.

Idk it seems to be mostly an anglo saxon thing to exclude people from the middle east, north africa etc from whiteness