I
imdelusional
Professionally sub-1
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2025
- Posts
- 79
- Reputation
- 82
First of all, before you come here to comment "brown eyed cope" or sum shit like that, I have dark brown hair and green eyes so in theory I have almost ideal colouring, which is exactly why I have come to the conclusion that really, colouring doesn't matter that much as you guys are making it seem, and that many times colouring is a matter of personal taste.
Me personally, I don't like brunnetes with lighter eyes, despite me being that. That's mainly because I see them as too striking: blondes with lighter eyes or brunnetes with brown eyes are far more comforting to look at, at least for me. (Although i don't judge anyone).
My mother for example, once told me she preferred tanned men with dark hair and dark eyes, which is, according to blackpillers, the worst colouring, right?
I do agree that in some ways colouring can help. For example, blonde eyebrows can be seen as less appealing as dark eyebrows - but that's only because darker eyebrows are perceived as thicker. The same thing happens with beards or eyelashes.
And so I thought, if for me there's no difference between a brown eyed blonde and a blue eyed brunnete, then I can't be the only one, right? It's usual to see you guys commenting shit like "brown eyes, it's over" (Francisco Lachowski, Zayn Malik, Jessica Alba, Cindy Kimberly...Yeah it's absolutely over for them, right? Smh)
It's not the eye colour, it's not the phenotype, it's the features.
It's a hill I will die on.
The difference between "uncanny" light eyes and "striking and charming" light eyes, is the eye shape and the ratios.
The difference between "boring" dark eyes and "warm, and captivating" dark eyes, is the eye shape and the ratios.
I have seen plenty of sub-5's with light eyes, and then there's Marlon Texeira and Jon Kortajena.
If we go to the actual studies done around this subject, it's true that when the eye was shown alone, people found rarer eye colours (blue, green, gray, amber and hazel) to be more attractive than brown or onyx eyes.
However, in other studies when the whole face was shown, there were no differences in attractiveness. They basically showed them the same girl and the same guy, photoshopped to have different eye and hair colours - their attractiveness ratings didn't change like, at all.
What changed was how they were perceived in terms of personality: brunnetes were perceived as more intelligent, blondes as less serious and more outgoing, brunnetes with lighter eyes as more striking and darker eyes as warmer.
Eye colour won't save you, and I don't believe in the "light colour" halo. I think that having dark hair and light eyes can be a striking feature, but, it's one striking feature among other things like hollow cheeks, a dowturned medial canthus, a defined jawline.....
And yes, I know that the difference from Chad to PSL God is usually a couple of striking feautes (as both of these tiers have near-perfect ratios, and no falios or falws, maximum of one slight amost unnoticeable flaw), but once again, there's a buffet of striking features besides light eyes and dark hair, so, no, your colouring does in no way, shape or form, cap your attractiveness, or boost it, because striking features are only important once you have Chad ratios.
If you don't believe me, look up "Shmergpilled" in tiktok. He's an awful racist, but he has ideal colouring: dark hair and light green eyes. He's still mtn at most, sub-5 because of his awful personality.
TL
R: Ratios>Dymorphism>Colouring.
Me personally, I don't like brunnetes with lighter eyes, despite me being that. That's mainly because I see them as too striking: blondes with lighter eyes or brunnetes with brown eyes are far more comforting to look at, at least for me. (Although i don't judge anyone).
My mother for example, once told me she preferred tanned men with dark hair and dark eyes, which is, according to blackpillers, the worst colouring, right?
I do agree that in some ways colouring can help. For example, blonde eyebrows can be seen as less appealing as dark eyebrows - but that's only because darker eyebrows are perceived as thicker. The same thing happens with beards or eyelashes.
And so I thought, if for me there's no difference between a brown eyed blonde and a blue eyed brunnete, then I can't be the only one, right? It's usual to see you guys commenting shit like "brown eyes, it's over" (Francisco Lachowski, Zayn Malik, Jessica Alba, Cindy Kimberly...Yeah it's absolutely over for them, right? Smh)
It's not the eye colour, it's not the phenotype, it's the features.
It's a hill I will die on.
The difference between "uncanny" light eyes and "striking and charming" light eyes, is the eye shape and the ratios.
The difference between "boring" dark eyes and "warm, and captivating" dark eyes, is the eye shape and the ratios.
I have seen plenty of sub-5's with light eyes, and then there's Marlon Texeira and Jon Kortajena.
If we go to the actual studies done around this subject, it's true that when the eye was shown alone, people found rarer eye colours (blue, green, gray, amber and hazel) to be more attractive than brown or onyx eyes.
However, in other studies when the whole face was shown, there were no differences in attractiveness. They basically showed them the same girl and the same guy, photoshopped to have different eye and hair colours - their attractiveness ratings didn't change like, at all.
What changed was how they were perceived in terms of personality: brunnetes were perceived as more intelligent, blondes as less serious and more outgoing, brunnetes with lighter eyes as more striking and darker eyes as warmer.
Eye colour won't save you, and I don't believe in the "light colour" halo. I think that having dark hair and light eyes can be a striking feature, but, it's one striking feature among other things like hollow cheeks, a dowturned medial canthus, a defined jawline.....
And yes, I know that the difference from Chad to PSL God is usually a couple of striking feautes (as both of these tiers have near-perfect ratios, and no falios or falws, maximum of one slight amost unnoticeable flaw), but once again, there's a buffet of striking features besides light eyes and dark hair, so, no, your colouring does in no way, shape or form, cap your attractiveness, or boost it, because striking features are only important once you have Chad ratios.
If you don't believe me, look up "Shmergpilled" in tiktok. He's an awful racist, but he has ideal colouring: dark hair and light green eyes. He's still mtn at most, sub-5 because of his awful personality.
TL
R: Ratios>Dymorphism>Colouring.
