B
brutal_blackpill
Mistral
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2019
- Posts
- 2,135
- Reputation
- 3,396
Myth #1: Women have an equivalent or greater sex drive than men. They just reserve it "only for Chad".
This is false. The very fact that it's reserved only for Chad proves that they have a lower sex drive. There was a study done with porn where straight females and straight males both watched lesbian porn, gay porn, straight porn, and animal porn. Straight men were mainly only attracted to straight porn and lesbian porn somewhat. Straight females showed signs of sexual stimulation to all of those kinds of porn except animal porn which was slightly less. Women have a more fluid but weaker sex drive. A common analogy to show this through your own experience is heightened sex drives because of alcohol. As alcohol enters your system, your standards lower, which is why there are many men who more easily get laid when a woman is under the influence of alcohol vs. not. Women are also influenced by status and attention metrics (i.e. the concept of having a trophy husband) than men. The idea of having an attractive partner so you can show it off to others for validation purposes is more important on average for a woman than man.
Myth #2: Money doesn't matter and doesn't influence physical attraction
Although this is not believed by everyone in this community, many do think this. Money, and to a general extent, status not only influences your place in the world but also your physical attraction. You literally become haloed as being more physically attractive. Using extreme counter examples of very ugly men to show how it doesn't work for them is disingenuous since most people are not very ugly. There have been studies showing that women orgasm more with rich men, which would only make sense if those richer men were perceived to be more attractive. This is easy to see actually. A lot of factors in attraction are based on what you see in trends, such as white men or white women being seen as attractive sex symbols which explains why there are MANY unattractive white women and to a lesser extent white men who are still seen as hot even if they are rated as unremarkable within lookism focused communities.
Myth #3: Personality doesn't matter
This will be a hard one for many of you to accept but it does. Studies have actually shown that the hierarchy of what matters is looks > personality > money, in that personality is even more important than how much money you have but less than looks. There have been other studies that show that men high in conscientiousness (working hard and showing due diligence) have more partners than others. Much of the community uses the same tactic of looking at extreme examples of very ugly men to then say "A better Personality won't work for them". Well, of course, it won't. But you're using examples from the lower end of the bell curve, and the vast majority is within the middle. 90%, if not 95-99% of you, will never attain a looks level as a man where good looking women regularly approach you. Due to lower sex drives of women, and the extreme status enjoyed by good looking women (actual good looking women, not women who can fraud in pics), it is extremely difficult to get constant attention from women unless you are an obvious male model. Even many of the good looking members in this community who have posted pictures of women who approached them first or who gave them a lot of attention first and can be somewhat verified were not very remarkable looking. Thus, this is where personality comes into play and can benefit you a shit ton.
It is important to note that many of the people here are ridden with anxiety, depression, and a general lack of confidence when it comes to matters with women. It is no surprise then and thus quite ironic that the userbase which consists of many socially incompetent men treats personality as irrelevant. "Being confident" is unironically very rare amongst men and is a sign of weakness. Confidence of course does not exist in a vacuum and often comes as a result of how you were treated in your younger years, which is why being anxious is more and more common nowadays in a world where women are far more often validated than men.
Myth #4: Race is irrelevant if you're good looking
Race is always relevant since the very concept of "good looking" is rigged for whites and is eurocentric (smaller noses for example are seen as more attractive since they are more common in whites). Note that there is nothing objective about this biologically since there have been studies done on infants who are known to look at attractive faces more and do not look at whites any longer than non whites. Until the world stops worshipping whites (which it will within about 50 years), the white advantage will remain. This advantage is definitely diminishing with black SMV increasing and even many Asians and Indians being seen in movies (although a very long way to go). Until that changes, the studies have shown that whites have an SMV advantage and thus a good looking non white person will suffer more than a good looking white person, often exponentially more. This difference is paramount on Tinder experiments.
Sources:
Rich men having women experience more orgasms: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-human-beast/200902/do-wealthy-men-give-more-orgasms
Study showing women having lower sex drives: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.437.3469&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Okcupid study on race (unfortunately doesn't exist anymore but here's an article talking about it):
Study showing Looks>Personality>Money hierarchy: http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/eli-finkel/documents/EastwickFinkel2008_JPSP.pdf
Study showing no preference for whites among newborns or 3 month old infants: "While newborn infants demonstrated no spontaneous preference for faces from either their own- or other-ethnic groups, 3-month-old infants demonstrated a significant preference for faces from their own-ethnic group." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566511/
This is false. The very fact that it's reserved only for Chad proves that they have a lower sex drive. There was a study done with porn where straight females and straight males both watched lesbian porn, gay porn, straight porn, and animal porn. Straight men were mainly only attracted to straight porn and lesbian porn somewhat. Straight females showed signs of sexual stimulation to all of those kinds of porn except animal porn which was slightly less. Women have a more fluid but weaker sex drive. A common analogy to show this through your own experience is heightened sex drives because of alcohol. As alcohol enters your system, your standards lower, which is why there are many men who more easily get laid when a woman is under the influence of alcohol vs. not. Women are also influenced by status and attention metrics (i.e. the concept of having a trophy husband) than men. The idea of having an attractive partner so you can show it off to others for validation purposes is more important on average for a woman than man.
Myth #2: Money doesn't matter and doesn't influence physical attraction
Although this is not believed by everyone in this community, many do think this. Money, and to a general extent, status not only influences your place in the world but also your physical attraction. You literally become haloed as being more physically attractive. Using extreme counter examples of very ugly men to show how it doesn't work for them is disingenuous since most people are not very ugly. There have been studies showing that women orgasm more with rich men, which would only make sense if those richer men were perceived to be more attractive. This is easy to see actually. A lot of factors in attraction are based on what you see in trends, such as white men or white women being seen as attractive sex symbols which explains why there are MANY unattractive white women and to a lesser extent white men who are still seen as hot even if they are rated as unremarkable within lookism focused communities.
Myth #3: Personality doesn't matter
This will be a hard one for many of you to accept but it does. Studies have actually shown that the hierarchy of what matters is looks > personality > money, in that personality is even more important than how much money you have but less than looks. There have been other studies that show that men high in conscientiousness (working hard and showing due diligence) have more partners than others. Much of the community uses the same tactic of looking at extreme examples of very ugly men to then say "A better Personality won't work for them". Well, of course, it won't. But you're using examples from the lower end of the bell curve, and the vast majority is within the middle. 90%, if not 95-99% of you, will never attain a looks level as a man where good looking women regularly approach you. Due to lower sex drives of women, and the extreme status enjoyed by good looking women (actual good looking women, not women who can fraud in pics), it is extremely difficult to get constant attention from women unless you are an obvious male model. Even many of the good looking members in this community who have posted pictures of women who approached them first or who gave them a lot of attention first and can be somewhat verified were not very remarkable looking. Thus, this is where personality comes into play and can benefit you a shit ton.
It is important to note that many of the people here are ridden with anxiety, depression, and a general lack of confidence when it comes to matters with women. It is no surprise then and thus quite ironic that the userbase which consists of many socially incompetent men treats personality as irrelevant. "Being confident" is unironically very rare amongst men and is a sign of weakness. Confidence of course does not exist in a vacuum and often comes as a result of how you were treated in your younger years, which is why being anxious is more and more common nowadays in a world where women are far more often validated than men.
Myth #4: Race is irrelevant if you're good looking
Race is always relevant since the very concept of "good looking" is rigged for whites and is eurocentric (smaller noses for example are seen as more attractive since they are more common in whites). Note that there is nothing objective about this biologically since there have been studies done on infants who are known to look at attractive faces more and do not look at whites any longer than non whites. Until the world stops worshipping whites (which it will within about 50 years), the white advantage will remain. This advantage is definitely diminishing with black SMV increasing and even many Asians and Indians being seen in movies (although a very long way to go). Until that changes, the studies have shown that whites have an SMV advantage and thus a good looking non white person will suffer more than a good looking white person, often exponentially more. This difference is paramount on Tinder experiments.
Sources:
Rich men having women experience more orgasms: https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-human-beast/200902/do-wealthy-men-give-more-orgasms
Study showing women having lower sex drives: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.437.3469&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Okcupid study on race (unfortunately doesn't exist anymore but here's an article talking about it):
Study showing Looks>Personality>Money hierarchy: http://faculty.wcas.northwestern.edu/eli-finkel/documents/EastwickFinkel2008_JPSP.pdf
Study showing no preference for whites among newborns or 3 month old infants: "While newborn infants demonstrated no spontaneous preference for faces from either their own- or other-ethnic groups, 3-month-old infants demonstrated a significant preference for faces from their own-ethnic group." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2566511/
Last edited:
