disillusioned
Kraken
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2019
- Posts
- 10,373
- Reputation
- 30,724
Being an excessively competitive macho right-winger is just as big of an incel trait as being a soy socialist tbh.
I mean, if you're born attractive and likeable, you're going to get social approval by default, so why be competitive, then? For what purpose?
Competitiveness = A need to prove something aka incel trait
Not to mention that the hard work myth is bullshit anyways; natural talent always beats hard work (that and nepotism/connections), so even if the goal is to be exceptional, there still probably isn't much reason to be ultra-competitive unless you're insecure af and trying to compensate.
EDIT: For the record, I'm not saying there is anything wrong with being passionate about something, but this is not necessarily the same as being competitive about it.
I mean, if you're born attractive and likeable, you're going to get social approval by default, so why be competitive, then? For what purpose?
Competitiveness = A need to prove something aka incel trait
Not to mention that the hard work myth is bullshit anyways; natural talent always beats hard work (that and nepotism/connections), so even if the goal is to be exceptional, there still probably isn't much reason to be ultra-competitive unless you're insecure af and trying to compensate.
EDIT: For the record, I'm not saying there is anything wrong with being passionate about something, but this is not necessarily the same as being competitive about it.
Last edited: