Concrete proof MSE didn't increase Ronald Ead's IPD

[optimisticzoomer]

So there's already this thread: https://looksmax.org/threads/proving-mse-provides-little-to-no-ipd-increase-in-adults.75923/



But I thought I would show the exact pixels to prove there was totally no change before and after MSE.



Here you can see the irises are the same size in both pics, and I measured the distance between the outer side of both irises because pupils can change in size. Iris width is 28 pixels and distance between is 168 pixels in both images

 

[Julian]

why did u not screenrecord but instead did this

 

[optimisticzoomer]

why did u not screenrecord but instead did this

It's on PC, idk how to screen record

 

[Julian]

It's on PC, idk how to screen record

boomertech tbh ngl

 

[Need2Ascend]

Way too imprecisely

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Way too imprecisely

What? I used the exact same starting points. Even if it wasn't precise, it would only be like 1 pixel out which is not even half a mm

 

[Need2Ascend]

What? I used the exact same starting points. Even if it wasn't precise, it would only be like 1 pixel out which is not even half a mm

If you only measure the iris wrong by a tiny bit like 0,5 pixel, it would already be 3 pixel difference in outercanthal distance which means about 1mm IPD difference in total

 

[optimisticzoomer]

If you only measure the iris wrong by a tiny bit like 0,5 pixel, it would already be 3 pixel difference in outercanthal distance which means about 1mm IPD difference in total

Measuring the iris was only showing that the images are the same size - which they already were anyway. I see what u mean but I'm telling you, it hasnt changed

 

[toolateforme]

Stop destroying low ipdcels cope!!

 

[optimisticzoomer]

Stop destroying low ipdcels cope!!

https://looksmax.org/threads/soft-tissue-changes-with-rme-including-eyes.280136/

 

[Deleted member 9467]

Ronald Ead said had calibrated the images to keep ipd the same. So no surprise that they're the same

 

[sub5inchcel]

Ronald Ead said had calibrated the images to keep ipd the same. So no surprise that they're the same

whats foes this mean can yiu dumb it down?

 

[sub5inchcel]

If you only measure the iris wrong by a tiny bit like 0,5 pixel, it would already be 3 pixel difference in outercanthal distance which means about 1mm IPD difference in total

whats foes this mean can yiu dumb it down?

Ronald Ead said had calibrated the images to keep ipd the same. So no surprise that they're the same

need2ascend is this true that he calibrated jt and what source? So he actuqlly got ipd expansion?

 

[sub5inchcel]

If you only measure the iris wrong by a tiny bit like 0,5 pixel, it would already be 3 pixel difference in outercanthal distance which means about 1mm IPD difference in total

bro answer me i gotta cope

 

[mvp2v1]

bro answer me i gotta cope

From a theoretical standpoint IPD and PFL increase is possible via mewing chewing and palatial expansion. If u want it bad u will have to do all these things at once to the safest extreme possible. I don’t know what will happen but am planning for a 9mm MSE where I will try and put these concepts to the test as best I can.

 

[sub5inchcel]

From a theoretical standpoint IPD and PFL increase is possible via mewing chewing and palatial expansion. If u want it bad u will have to do all these things at once to the safest extreme possible. I don’t know what will happen but am planning for a 9mm MSE where I will try and put these concepts to the test as best I can.

aight update me then, also age?

 

[mvp2v1]

aight update me then, also age?

22. Btw I think the metopic suture being closed early (my case) may influence my ability to get IPD change from MSE and chewing. Like I said I will try. I’m probably going to need an osteotomy for my eyes because of the early closure.

 

[mvp2v1]

Note all the suture sites. Sutures are where bone is produced to allow for growth of the bone in size. Like growth plates. They do not close in healthy individuals until 60 and 70s however they do seem to become very un active. Why this is I’m not sure perhaps growth hormone levels? There are cases however in unhealthy individuals such as myself where the sutures fuse and have excessive buildup of bone. Basically it becomes one solid bone. And if you are closer to my end of the spectrum no more new bone growth will occurr at said suture. Looking at the image here, u can imagine which bone production sights (sutures) are most relevent to IPD

 

[sub5inchcel]

View attachment 1844733

Note all the suture sites. Sutures are where bone is produced to allow for growth of the bone in size. Like growth plates. They do not close in healthy individuals until 60 and 70s however they do seem to become very un active. Why this is I’m not sure perhaps growth hormone levels? There are cases however in unhealthy individuals such as myself where the sutures fuse and have excessive buildup of bone. Basically it becomes one solid bone. And if you are closer to my end of the spectrum no more new bone growth will occurr at said suture. Looking at the image here, u can imagine which bone production sights (sutures) are most relevent to IPD

since zygomas (purple) get widened, wouldnt that result in wider temples too

 

[mvp2v1]

since zygomas (purple) get widened, wouldnt that result in wider temples too

U mean this?The only way I see this becoming wider is via a change in the neurocraniumfrom Mew hint chewing etc, as well as growth of the temporalis muscle. The answer is yes there would be changes. But I don’t know if they would overshadow the change in IPD. If ur worried that it would effectively cancel out the eye spacing effect I don’t think it’s something to worry about