Confusion about bp ratings vs the 1-10 looks scale.

[Zephyr.psl]

Im confused about the relationship between both scales. , is an an ltn lower than high ltn a sub 5? Is a low mtn a 5 out of ten? Is a high mtn a 5.5/10? Is an htn a 6? Idk lmk

 

[Zeekie]

Im confused about the relationship between both scales. , is an an ltn lower than high ltn a sub 5? Is a low mtn a 5 out of ten? Is a high mtn a 5.5/10? Is an htn a 6? Idk lmk

Want a real answer? There isn't, lmao. The PSL scale is a completely made up pseudo-rating system, there's not a consensus on it and everyone has a different take on the numerical value of each rating or what the difference is between LTN, MTN vs HTN is outside of opinions.

People usually say LTN is 1.5 to 3, MTN is 3-4.5 and HTN is 4.5-5.5. So a "pure" LTN is around 2, a "pure" MTN is around a 4 and a "pure" HTN is around a 5.

 

[UtahParentCenterPSL]

Want a real answer? There isn't, lmao. The PSL scale is a completely made up pseudo-rating system, there's not a consensus on it and everyone has a different take on the numerical value of each rating or what the difference is between LTN, MTN vs HTN is outside of opinions.

People usually say LTN is 1.5 to 3, MTN is 3-4.5 and HTN is 4.5-5.5. So a "pure" LTN is around 2, a "pure" MTN is around a 4 and a "pure" HTN is around a 5.

If you follow that idea then you'd come to the conclusion HTN is average. i'd agrue HTN is 5.5

 

[perfection is law]

the way i see it is like this:

subhuman: bottom 1% of looks, deformed to the point that they dont look human

sub 5: below average

ltn: slightly below average

mtn: average

htn: slightly above average

cl: above average

chad: top 1% of looks, basically the opposite of subhuman

 

[Zephyr.psl]

Want a real answer? There isn't, lmao. The PSL scale is a completely made up pseudo-rating system, there's not a consensus on it and everyone has a different take on the numerical value of each rating or what the difference is between LTN, MTN vs HTN is outside of opinions.

People usually say LTN is 1.5 to 3, MTN is 3-4.5 and HTN is 4.5-5.5. So a "pure" LTN is around 2, a "pure" MTN is around a 4 and a "pure" HTN is around a 5.

thanks bro i appreciate the response

 

[Zephyr.psl]

If you follow that idea then you'd come to the conclusion HTN is average. i'd agrue HTN is 5.5

Oh ok but what i find strange is that htns are kind of rare to find yet they are only a "5.5" out of ten

 

[Zephyr.psl]

the way i see it is like this:

subhuman: bottom 1% of looks, deformed to the point that they dont look human

sub 5: below average

ltn: slightly below average

mtn: average

htn: slightly above average

cl: above average

chad: top 1% of looks, basically the opposite of subhuman

I thought htn was better than only slightly above average

 

[Zeekie]

If you follow that idea then you'd come to the conclusion HTN is average. i'd agrue HTN is 5.5

Technically speaking 5/10 is the "statistical" average, but 5/10 isn't the population average, according to the best research we have at least.

If we take this scale for instance, you can see my point illustrated pretty clearly, only 16% men are above average (+5) and 58% of men rank below average, so sub5. The average man, according to female judgment, DOES NOT rank within the statistical average, hence why MTN is closer to 4/10 than it is 5/10, and subsequently why HTN is at minimum 5/10.

 

[SilverStCloud]

It's all subjective which is why PSL and other rating scales are mostly bullshit. All that matters is how you are treated irl and online if you post your face.

 

[Zephyr.psl]

Technically speaking 5/10 is the "statistical" average, but 5/10 isn't the population average, according to the best research we have at least.

View attachment 3811623

If we take this scale for instance, you can see my point illustrated pretty clearly, only 16% men are above average (+5) and 58% of men rank below average, so sub5. The average man, according to female judgment, DOES NOT rank within the statistical average, hence why MTN is closer to 4/10 than it is 5/10, and subsequently why HTN is at minimum 5/10.

yeah thats fucking brutal. Its crazy sometimes that girls rate good looking guys as "mid". Girls standards are absolutely fucking insane these days

 

[Zephyr.psl]

It's all subjective which is why PSL and other rating scales are mostly bullshit. All that matters is how you are treated irl and online if you post your face.

Idk man because irl, i get girls based on looks but get rated mtn on these forums.

 

[SilverStCloud]

Idk man because irl, i get girls based on looks but get rated mtn on these forums.

How girls treat you based on your looks its all that matters. These forums are filled with bitter and jealous faggots who are praying on the downfall of people they perceive as a threat in one way or another. Hell I've seen a lot of bp fags saying guys like Dellisola and Delon are HTN max despite them drowning in pussy.
Most blackpillers and incels have no idea what women like which is why they are always drawn to ultra masculine models and features in the same way red pill fags are drawn to ugly masc fags like the Tates.
Most black pillers are just as delusional as red pillers when it comes to what attracts women because they still fall for the ultra masculine BS. Just search 8 PSL morph and you'll see how bullshit all of this is.

 

[Zephyr.psl]

How girls treat you based on your looks its all that matters. These forums are filled with bitter and jealous faggots who are praying on the downfall of people they perceive as a threat in one way or another. Hell I've seen a lot of bp fags saying guys like Dellisola and Delon are HTN max despite them drowning in pussy.
Most blackpillers and incels have no idea what women like which is why they are always drawn to ultra masculine models and features in the same red pill fags are drawn to ugly masc fags like the Tates.
Most black pillers are just as delusional as red pillers when it comes to what attracts women because they still fall for the ultra masculine BS. Just search 8 PSL morph and you'll see how bullshit all of this is.

Bro that makes so much fucking sense. I see good looking pretty boys on this forum getting rated ltn. Irl a lot of the good looking pretty boys on here would be swimming in pussy irl just in terms of their looks. Idk why so many people on this forum are so drawn to ultra masculine men.

 

[Orthognathic]

Im confused about the relationship between both scales. , is an an ltn lower than high ltn a sub 5? Is a low mtn a 5 out of ten? Is a high mtn a 5.5/10? Is an htn a 6? Idk lmk

3 =subhuman, 4=ltn, 5=mtn, 6=htn, 7=cl, 8=chad, anything else is wrong

 

[perfection is law]

I thought htn was better than only slightly above average

when i say slightly above average i dont mean "barely above average" i mean that they are in fact above average but they are arent fully above average if that makes sense, so i'd say they are attractive and chadlites are very attractive and chads are extremely attractive but i feel like this makes it kinda hard to know the difference between the 3

 

[Niverx]

How girls treat you based on your looks its all that matters. These forums are filled with bitter and jealous faggots who are praying on the downfall of people they perceive as a threat in one way or another. Hell I've seen a lot of bp fags saying guys like Dellisola and Delon are HTN max despite them drowning in pussy.
Most blackpillers and incels have no idea what women like which is why they are always drawn to ultra masculine models and features in the same way red pill fags are drawn to ugly masc fags like the Tates.
Most black pillers are just as delusional as red pillers when it comes to what attracts women because they still fall for the ultra masculine BS. Just search 8 PSL morph and you'll see how bullshit all of this is.

this is definetely the best post i have ever seen

 

[Niverx]

Im confused about the relationship between both scales. , is an an ltn lower than high ltn a sub 5? Is a low mtn a 5 out of ten? Is a high mtn a 5.5/10? Is an htn a 6? Idk lmk

ltn is 4.5-5, mtn is 5-5.5, htn 5.5-6.5,cl 6.5-7.5,chad 7.5-above. this would be the appropriate scale imo, and if someone is genuinely below a 4.5 they automatically count as subhumans. also sub5 isnt the same as ltn,mtn,htn and etc, sub5 is just someone who is BELOW a five, anything below a 4.5 is just subhuman. for example: a 4.7 rated ltn is sub5, and anything below that is also a sub5.

but none of that really matters, if you can slay women thats all that really matters.