D
Deleted member 3990
Kraken
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2019
- Posts
- 8,301
- Reputation
- 15,408
Preface:
I had this thought for a longer while, because it is logical if you imagine what the LeForts and BSSOs do
But one thread on Lookism put my thoughts into words and even expanded further on it
lookism.net
And I have translated this into the "facade" surgeries like, pretty much, all made on the splanchocranium (LeFort 3, facial fillers and implants, MSE, typical Bimax etc.)
You might still get an anteface somewhat from Bimax, even if you fall into the category I will expand on now, but it will not really be a big aesthetic boost or it may look unnatural
Short Introduction - The Common Bimax:
The Common Bimax is the standard LeFort 1 (there are many different kinds)
and the BSSO (Bisagittal Split Osteotomy) per Dal Pont
the BSSO looks like this:
the normal LeFort 1 like this:
(straigth advancement)
Most important is the Base ... literally
So what is the "Base" I talk about?
The Cranial Base angle
One of many things you can not change (with normal surgeries) but still determines your face
The angle I marked in red is the cranial base Angle (there are 7 types, this is the most common one)
"Why is this so important ?"
This is what I associate with downward growth
This not only affects your mandible, but also the whole maxilla, orbitals the whole neurocranium (everything of your skull which is not your face) and your head posture (and airways and upper spine)
" But Shekel, this doesnt look so bad! those with higher Angle just need a BSSO"
As I said, you can achieve a proper orthognatic side-profile with a higher and a lower base (it depends on severity)
!BUT!
Left one has normal angle, the right one a higher angle
This, Ladies and gentlemen, is the true facial growth
one bad orthognatic feature? You probably have more
They go hand in hand
Ever wondered whyy I can tell faces so good, especially from Cephs or Cts ? because I integrate this in my thought pattern
Many of you know this already subconsciously, for example, many can tell if a Jew got a Rhinoplasty
Those with short angles can easily get a LeFort and BSSO and benefit from it easily (aesthetically)
Those with higher Angles? They can quench the rope between jaw and neck, so it does not slip jfl
A Good Angle?
If we measure from
Basion - Sella - Nasion
the ideal angle should be around 125°/130°
the one in the picture above is approx. 135° / 140° and thus (most likely) a Class 2
Human with a B-S-Na Angle of lower than 125° are (most likely) Class 3
This thread was written with one thumb, is unstructured and has many grammatical errors or is not followable
I thought about studying into Cephs and making custom Cephs per-vista for members here but I do not think this would benefit me nor you
I had this thought for a longer while, because it is logical if you imagine what the LeForts and BSSOs do
But one thread on Lookism put my thoughts into words and even expanded further on it
on the cranial base
ngl, its time for lookism to catch up on some, apparently, basic orthodontic and morphologic knowledge. felt quite painful reading up on all of this 70 years post fact and literally knowing nothing about one of the most influential factors in determining the structure of the splanchno. itt, i...
lookism.net
And I have translated this into the "facade" surgeries like, pretty much, all made on the splanchocranium (LeFort 3, facial fillers and implants, MSE, typical Bimax etc.)
You might still get an anteface somewhat from Bimax, even if you fall into the category I will expand on now, but it will not really be a big aesthetic boost or it may look unnatural
Short Introduction - The Common Bimax:
The Common Bimax is the standard LeFort 1 (there are many different kinds)
and the BSSO (Bisagittal Split Osteotomy) per Dal Pont
the BSSO looks like this:
the normal LeFort 1 like this:
(straigth advancement)
Most important is the Base ... literally
So what is the "Base" I talk about?
The Cranial Base angle
One of many things you can not change (with normal surgeries) but still determines your face
The angle I marked in red is the cranial base Angle (there are 7 types, this is the most common one)
"Why is this so important ?"
This is what I associate with downward growth
This not only affects your mandible, but also the whole maxilla, orbitals the whole neurocranium (everything of your skull which is not your face) and your head posture (and airways and upper spine)
" But Shekel, this doesnt look so bad! those with higher Angle just need a BSSO"
As I said, you can achieve a proper orthognatic side-profile with a higher and a lower base (it depends on severity)
!BUT!
Left one has normal angle, the right one a higher angle
This, Ladies and gentlemen, is the true facial growth
one bad orthognatic feature? You probably have more
They go hand in hand
Ever wondered whyy I can tell faces so good, especially from Cephs or Cts ? because I integrate this in my thought pattern
Many of you know this already subconsciously, for example, many can tell if a Jew got a Rhinoplasty
Those with short angles can easily get a LeFort and BSSO and benefit from it easily (aesthetically)
Those with higher Angles? They can quench the rope between jaw and neck, so it does not slip jfl
A Good Angle?
If we measure from
Basion - Sella - Nasion
the ideal angle should be around 125°/130°
the one in the picture above is approx. 135° / 140° and thus (most likely) a Class 2
Human with a B-S-Na Angle of lower than 125° are (most likely) Class 3
This thread was written with one thumb, is unstructured and has many grammatical errors or is not followable
I thought about studying into Cephs and making custom Cephs per-vista for members here but I do not think this would benefit me nor you
