![falcon1](/data/avatars/l/30/30411.jpg?1693875005)
falcon1
999
- Joined
- Jun 1, 2023
- Posts
- 2,739
- Reputation
- 2,439
Yes but not to the extent most here want to take it to. Studies have shown when men sleep next to their children, testosterone levels drop due to an evolutionary trait as men with children will take less risk taking behavior ultimately making the children safer and the father more nurturing.
Essentially I think it's normal for women to choose to be with a less masculine man to provide stability, harmony and comfort for a family. However they will sexually crave the more masculine man which will likely have a larger penis and is literally capable of taking out sperm (say her husband's) and replacing it with his own. Dicks are actually designed to do this, but a small dick is far less effective then a larger one and hence if she is cheating with a larger one, the larger one will usually win. This will provide her with stronger and better looking children to support her when she is older and have a stronger tribe while maintaining the stability of her husband (the cuckold)
There is studies showing jawline and nose size correlates strongly with dick size, so this would be part of how women may be more attracted or even know the masculine man has a larger dick without seeing it,
Studies showing women prefer smaller (or average) dicks for a partner even though they're more sexually attracted to larger ones.
So women cheating is entirely natural and part of nature, how the provider and (possible) father feels about it is irrelevant because in the hunter and gathering days, the provider would be much less likely to find out as her and the stud could literally go in the woods and fuck without any trail of evidence like there would be today.
I would even bet more women cheated during hunter gathering days then they do now. I would even argue masculine men bred out the less masculine ones as men with thinner faces were only seen in the rich since the 1600s (probably the only women where cheating was too difficult)
Of course, this is all by my memory of watching endless documentaries and constantly bored research but if you'd like to call me out of anything I can try to provide sources.
Essentially I think it's normal for women to choose to be with a less masculine man to provide stability, harmony and comfort for a family. However they will sexually crave the more masculine man which will likely have a larger penis and is literally capable of taking out sperm (say her husband's) and replacing it with his own. Dicks are actually designed to do this, but a small dick is far less effective then a larger one and hence if she is cheating with a larger one, the larger one will usually win. This will provide her with stronger and better looking children to support her when she is older and have a stronger tribe while maintaining the stability of her husband (the cuckold)
There is studies showing jawline and nose size correlates strongly with dick size, so this would be part of how women may be more attracted or even know the masculine man has a larger dick without seeing it,
Studies showing women prefer smaller (or average) dicks for a partner even though they're more sexually attracted to larger ones.
So women cheating is entirely natural and part of nature, how the provider and (possible) father feels about it is irrelevant because in the hunter and gathering days, the provider would be much less likely to find out as her and the stud could literally go in the woods and fuck without any trail of evidence like there would be today.
I would even bet more women cheated during hunter gathering days then they do now. I would even argue masculine men bred out the less masculine ones as men with thinner faces were only seen in the rich since the 1600s (probably the only women where cheating was too difficult)
Of course, this is all by my memory of watching endless documentaries and constantly bored research but if you'd like to call me out of anything I can try to provide sources.