TRT dose. You will see negligible changes and since you're doing PCT, you'll go back to baseline and feel like shit.
Sure whatever, monitor lipids but it isn't really needed.
Good, monitor lipids every so often
Not sure why? If you had it prescribed before then use it, if you're using it preemptively, don't.
Not needed.
Don't unless you see high E symptoms. Pin daily instead of 2x weekly to avoid any AIs.
No. Blast and cruise.
Not a cycle.
Would you please suggest me something better i don't really know bout roids ass well
Pin everything daily, not 2x per week. Don't use AI unless really needed (9/10 times it's better to take sth like primo or mast instead of AI, increasing anabolic load + no need for AI)
Primo and mast once I couldn't afford primo anymore, were the best compounds I've stacked ever. Please explain your issue with them.
They are have horribly detrimental activity in skin and hair while not giving the benefits such effects would imply as they are not very systemucallu androgenic, microdosed tren and eq mogs it to death, var and lgd too
Because hes preventing/reversing testicular attophy which is the factor that makes androgens uniquely hard to recover from, your hypothalamus still resets awfully quick so it would be as easy to recover from gh as test with hcg
Because lipids are on of if not the most important biomarkers hence why statins are one of the most revolutionairy pharma of modern times. The downside of them is trivial for great benefit as your lipids with great certainty stay solid
While not giving the benefits? Have you ever run any of these? My primo run was the best I've looked on cycle. 0 water whatsoever. All AAS are gonna suck if you're genetically predisposed to react badly to it. I'm not gonna comment on eq and lgd because I haven't used it yet, but tren for a first cycle is just stupid. Not because the compound is stupid but because OP is stupid. Yes, it microdosing tren is good but for me, it's on par with test+primo/mast. A lot of the time, gear is personal preference/how your body reacts as an individual.
At this mild of a cycle, I doubt he'd take long to recover with just Nolva+Clomid. It's cheaper plus it's less of a hassle. Again, personal preference. Some of my friends attribute everything to HCG for recovery but some don't. In my personal experience, if the anabolic load of the first cycle isn't too heavy, HCG is not needed. It's certainly the most useful after coming off after years of use but here I just can't justify it.
The less you use the better. If your lipids have gone to shit, find the culprit and manage that before adding more variables to the equation. That's just as dumb as taking AI "just in case". I'm all for using it if you did everything in your power to get lipids in range by manipulating the doses or injection frequency or just compound selection in general. Even then, if your lipids are out of range on the lowest possible dose, maybe this shit isn't for you.
I have not nor will i, nor does it matter because your, my or anyones experince are not law
Thats why i mentioned more compounds, people may react different but they do not react that different for most things and relative effects are pretty constant
If you cant handle that small price difference you cant afford to roid, nolva plus clomid might cause quick recovery but its still objectively inferior method, its still slower, leaves you up for more sides, messes with shbg etc etc
We know the culprit, its the roids. So you could then either lower your dose with no statin and get less gains or keep going, add a statin and likely be healthier
Ai is bad just in case because missuse comes with horrible consequences as e2 is the most important hormone. Statins fo not come with the same risk, they will almost always make yoh healthier, even natty. If low e2 was not a worry then premtably taking it wouldnt be so stupid would it?
Youre for a less effective more inconvenient method?
