Dating Market Efficiency and Tinder

Moneymaxxed

Moneymaxxed

Gold
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Posts
943
Reputation
1,947
If you’re an ugly man or ethnic or anything but chad really, you want the dating market to go back to the 1950s. Why? Because the dating market was not efficient.

Her (the buyer) sometimes overpaid for you (the seller) because she couldn’t find what she really wants very easily. Her options were limited.

Tinder and other dating apps made the market more efficient. Meaning that Stacy wanted Chad all along. Becky also wanted Chad but just couldn’t access him as easily. Approaching him would be too awkward and there probably weren’t many around (also, even Chads don’t approach women much).

Now the pain of rejection is much softer online, and she can now locate every chad in a 50 mile radius... so they all have of 20 different Chads.

The only hope these days is if she doesn’t use dating apps, or you are both in some temporary insulated dating market like school or etc. where men don’t have to compete with everyone around yet, only their peers. And you have other benefits like mere exposure effect (she sees you every day so likes you more and trusts you, giving you a big advantage)

or just become chad. That’s the goal of this forum

it’s never been better to be chad in human history. The guys who got laid the most a very long time ago were Kings and other betabuxxers (not good looking just the most dark triad wealthy ones). The 50s Chads power was limited by culture and dating market inefficiency. Now women don’t need money AND the market is efficient.
@eduardkoopman
 
Bro we already know looks = everything
 
Nothing new. We all know that already.
 
  • Love it
Reactions: Toth's thot

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top