Define the features of CL and Chad that distinguish from others

Bones
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: thechuddiestchud and soapbubble
Everything
What kind of question is this?
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Bunny__, soapbubble, zenserenity and 4 others
Everything
What kind of question is this?
theres really no diff ngl this rating system is really flawed theres a much bigger gap between subhuman and mtn than htn to chad

and honestly cl and chad a basically the same you could be cl btu your rich or famous and be treated as chad
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: SAQUIB66, Bunny__ and Kara
Everything
What kind of question is this?
The gap between CL and Chad is minimal at best. People disagree with who is considered as 'Chad' and who counts as 'CL' all the time.
 
  • +1
Reactions: YourLocalLMTN and soapbubble
theres really no diff ngl this rating system is really flawed theres a much bigger gap between subhuman and mtn than htn to chad
It isn't flawed. Do you even know how to rate someone?
and honestly cl and chad a basically the same you could be cl btu your rich or famous and be treated as chad
No they aren't. Status can incrase your SMV but won't effect your place in the PSL scale
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: cortisolman2
It isn't flawed. Do you even know how to rate someone?

No they aren't. Status can incrase your SMV but won't effect your place in the PSL scale
"treated"

i dont see a diff between cl and chad honestly ther basically the same but alr whatever you say
 
  • +1
Reactions: Topkra
The gap between CL and Chad is minimal at best. People disagree with who is considered as 'Chad' and who counts as 'CL' all the time.
This is not a minimal difference
 

Attachments

  • 1775413426143.png
    1775413426143.png
    157.8 KB · Views: 0
  • 1775413443763.png
    1775413443763.png
    61.7 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Kara
you little dumb bitch
Kill yourself you ugly manlet subhuman and put your looksmax.org account on deletion before doing it
 
  • JFL
Reactions: InspiredByClav
very distinct bones, like just looking at a cls face compared to a htn and the cl will have very defined and nearly perfectly placed bones
 
your one of the most retarded people i've seen on here
marlon is definetly not a CHAD and clav is not a CL lol you dumb fuck grey
I said november clav*. And marlon is chad dumb faggot
 
your one of the most retarded people i've seen on here
marlon is definetly not a CHAD and clav is not a CL lol you dumb fuck grey
prime marlon can be considered low chad tbh
 
your one of the most retarded people i've seen on here
marlon is definetly not a CHAD and clav is not a CL lol you dumb fuck grey
Marlon can be considered Low Chad tbh
Dimo too high
 
you joined in 2025 you dumb fuck

and ur a dumb grey
 
  • JFL
Reactions: InspiredByClav
This is not a minimal difference
The lighting and angles for the second picture are not favourable at all while Gandy's image is a press-wall photo. The comparison is not fair.

From these images alone, neither really have a face overwhelmingly better than the other.

It seems like people are quick to slot GL men with 6.5+ PSL into 'Chad' and 'Chadlite' based on who looks closer to the standard masculine man and pretty boy archetypes respectively.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Topkra
The lighting and angles for the second picture are not favourable at all while Gandy's image is a press-wall photo. The comparison is not fair.

From these images alone, neither really have a face overwhelmingly better than the other.

It seems like people are quick to slot GL men with 6.5+ PSL into 'Chad' and 'Chadlite' based on who looks closer to the standard masculine man and pretty boy archetypes respectively.
Gandy moggs in every single aspect and it is not about the lighting.
Harmony is close
Gandy easily takes dimo + not debatable
Gandy also takes angularity. Again, not debatable
Misc goes to Gandy too.
There is a clear difference between a Chad and a Chadlite. Only reason most people say it is "close" is because they did not see a chadlite and a chad irl next to another.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Kara
Gandy moggs in every single aspect and it is not about the lighting.
Harmony is close
Gandy easily takes dimo + not debatable
Gandy also takes angularity. Again, not debatable
Misc goes to Gandy too.
Fair points but I disagree on angularity. For example, the second guy has a better ogee curve even in this low quality photo.
There is a clear difference between a Chad and a Chadlite. Only reason most people say it is "close" is because they did not see a chadlite and a chad irl next to another.
I get your perspective, but I don’t think we’ll agree on this.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Topkra
Fair points but I disagree on angularity. For example, the second guy has a better ogee curve even in this low quality photo.
I could not find a pic of hateqq that angularity moggs this
Fair points but I disagree on angularity. For example, the second guy has a better ogee curve even in this low quality photo.

I get your perspective, but I don’t think we’ll agree on this.
Valid
 

Attachments

  • 1775416200969.png
    1775416200969.png
    279.6 KB · Views: 0
  • +1
Reactions: Kara
If you go down the street at 23% bodyfat and don't get IOI's from all the foids you're subCL, plain & easy
 

Similar threads

secretAscendAnon
Replies
13
Views
59
stucknlimbo
stucknlimbo
Iblamerx_Mixxgg
OP cl?
Replies
8
Views
89
poc
poc
Iblamerx_Mixxgg
OP cl?
Replies
0
Views
34
Iblamerx_Mixxgg
Iblamerx_Mixxgg
toppins
Replies
27
Views
192
truep0lishguy
T
inceliusndius
Replies
2
Views
44
truep0lishguy
T

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top