Democracy will revert evolution destroy the world

[disillusioned]

It's the same simple process everywhere in the world where democracy is implemented:

1. The worthless voters outnumber the worthy ones and only vote for policies that favor them.
2. Birthrates among the intelligent lower as a result because why have children if the dumb will destroy their future anyway.
3. Birthrates among the dumb increase because they don't have any farsighted views on anything and because of welfare.
4. Politicians embrace mass immigration to get easy votes and cheaper labor, which results in an even larger increase of low IQ people.
5. Massive and rampant dysgenics destroy the gene pool, basically reverting evolution.
6. Civilization collapses.

THIS IS HAPPENING IN EVERY SINGLE DEMOCRACY ON THE PLANET. The ONLY countries that aren't suffering this are dictatorships like china. Democracy will literally destroy most of the human species.

 

[Drugs]

d

 

[KEy21]

It should be according to whom pays the most taxes. They should have the majority stake...it’s like a shareholders meeting for the future of the country

Depends on what you mean by “worthy” those who make the most money are generally smarter than the average person.

US is still the best place in the world for entrepreneurship. If people cannot generate their own wealth and use the inherited wealth excuse, they should just continue to LDAR

Nobody really matters except for those who have a lot of money

 

[pretty boy]

 

[Deleted member 1100]

Democracy will literally destroy most of the human species.

Didn't read, but you're correct, democracy is a disgrace

 

[Deleted member 685]

Didn't read, didn't care. Will never read.

 

[Deleted member 1100]

It should be according to whom pays the most taxes.

No, it shouldn't, that would only concentrate more power in their hands just like it does rn to the poor who are more numerous. The right thing and the only acceptable one is anarchy, unfourtanetely people are too stupid and always thing that anarchy = no laws.

 

[KEy21]

No, it shouldn't, that would only concentrate more power in their hands just like it does rn to the poor who are more numerous. The right thing and the only acceptable one is anarchy, unfourtanetely people are too stupid and always thing that anarchy = no laws.

Most poor people are stupid. It’s better that their decisions are made for them

 

[Alt Number 3]

No, it shouldn't, that would only concentrate more power in their hands just like it does rn to the poor who are more numerous. The right thing and the only acceptable one is anarchy, unfourtanetely people are too stupid and always thing that anarchy = no laws.

Who cares about poor. Sooner they die the better

 

[Deleted member 1100]

Most poor people are stupid. It’s better that their decisions are made for them

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING PHAGGOT PIECE OF SHIT, KILL YOURSELF, YOU'RE NO GODM SLIT YOUR FUCKING TINY WRIST!

 

[KEy21]

SHUT THE FUCK UP YOU FUCKING PHAGGOT PIECE OF SHIT, KILL YOURSELF, YOU'RE NO GODM SLIT YOUR FUCKING TINY WRIST!

The truth hurts. Especially as a favela dwelling Brazilian I’m sure.

 

[Deleted member 3328]

not a single word

 

[Deleted member 1100]

The truth hurts. Especially as a favela dwelling Brazilian I’m sure.

not a single word

 

[DOggo]

"The worthless voters outnumber the worthy ones and only vote for policies that favor them."


You're an idiot. The entire point of democracy is to vote for representatives that will help enact policies that will directly benefit you.

 

[disillusioned]

Didn't read, but you're correct, democracy is a disgrace

I have that book actually. Hoppe makes some interesting points against democracy but I disliked his libertarian bullshit.

Most poor people are stupid. It’s better that their decisions are made for them

Problem with this logic is that automation will soon make the majority of the population poor while also making it possible for the rich to create wealth without even really needing to do anything.

You're an idiot. The entire point of democracy is to vote for representatives that will help enact policies that will directly benefit you.

Which is why it fails. There will always be more worthless people than not worthless people, which means democracy will always degenerate over time.

Tbh I think most of these problems could be solved by just making it so that only males can vote as use to be the case in the past. Things only started going truly downhill after women got the right to vote.

 

[auboutduprecipice]

A democracy with heavy restrictions can work. What we have now cannot in the long term

 

[KrissKross]

Automation is a massive meme. Jfl at thinking technology can take over from humans to any meaningful degree

 

[auboutduprecipice]

Automation is a massive meme. Jfl at thinking technology can take over from humans to any meaningful degree

 

[pisslord]

it worked at first

 

[Deleted member 1100]

I have that book actually. Hoppe makes some interesting points against democracy but I disliked his libertarian bullshit.

His defense on libertarianism on that book is just the surface, and not really concise, you need to read his book on the Ethics of Private Property (there are still some missing points though)

 

[KrissKross]

What’s the odds you are a programmer/coder cel who thinks technology is the greatest thing in the world. Keep coping with techy gimmicky gadgets boyo

 

[auboutduprecipice]

What’s the odds you are a programmer/coder cel who thinks technology is the greatest thing in the world. Keep coping with techy gimmicky gadgets boyo

on the contrary i think people would be happier with less technology

 

[Zeta ascended]

Not a word

 

[disillusioned]

Automation is a massive meme. Jfl at thinking technology can take over from humans to any meaningful degree

We already have big corporations announcing that they will soon be able to replace fast food staff with robots. As well as shelf stackers and other similar low wage jobs. Soon they will even have driverless cars. You are massively bluepilled if you think the elites will actually need most humans in the future. Even doctors are being slowly replaced by machines. The only thing machines might not be able to entirely replace are the programmers, and even then programming is being at least partially automated.

Why do you think the elites are so eager to replace first worlders with third worlders despite the later being too stupid to do skilled jobs and despite soon being useless even for unskilled jobs because of automation? It's because the elites know that humans will soon no longer be useful for wageslaving so they just want a large sea of docile and easily controlled morons that they will then be able to get rid of anyway once they have outlived their usefulness.