laaltin
Semi-retired
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2023
- Posts
- 5,269
- Reputation
- 6,842
I forge my own destiny
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Who you are is determined solely by two things - genetics and environment. From the day you were born, every aspect of your life was predetermined - your looks, your level of intelligence, your personality and your position in society. What exactly do you mean by "I forge my own destiny"?I forge my own destiny
There's a difference between casual determinism and stochastic determinsimWho you are is determined solely by two things - genetics and environment. From the day you were born, every aspect of your life was predetermined - your looks, your level of intelligence, your personality and your position in society. What exactly do you mean by "I forge my own destiny"?
I am a supporter of causal determinism, stochastic determinism sounds like something contradictory.There's a difference between casual determinism and stochastic determinsim
If only the universe was that simpleI am a supporter of causal determinism
whats ur destinyI forge my own destiny
My freewill to choose things within the constraints of my reality/circumstancewhats ur destiny
so it was determines u have limits. brutalMy freewill to choose things within the constraints of my reality/circumstance
Yesso it was determines u have limits. brutal
#blackpill
The randomness disproves hard determinsim#blackpill
how do u know its randomThe randomness disproves hard determinsim
life altering accidents, chance meetings etc. that change the course of life.. things like that.how do u know its random
are you speaking from personal experience?life altering accidents, chance meetings etc. that change the course of life.. things like that.
It's true in general. Casual determinism is too simple to encapsulate life. There are factors like luck, feedback loops, external inputs etc. that add complexity. Look into probabilistic determinism if it interests you. There's some space for agency/freedom in life, it's not completely predetermined like the blackpill claims it to be.are you speaking from personal experience?
what if a stalker is dictating your life?It's true in general. Casual determinism is too simple to encapsulate life. There are factors like luck, feedback loops, external inputs etc. that add complexity. Look into probabilistic determinism if it interests you. There's some space for agency/freedom in life, it's not completely predetermined like the blackpill claims it to be.
I don't see how any of this disproves causal determinism. I would say that every event has antecedents that could explain it, but some things are simply too complex for humanity to explain by causality, and so it's easier to look at them through the prism of probability.life altering accidents, chance meetings etc. that change the course of life.. things like that.
In a classical sense, yes. How do you reconcile casual determinism with modern physics?I don't see how any of this disproves causal determinism. I would say that every event has antecedents that could explain it, but some things are simply too complex for humanity to explain by causality, and so it's easier to look at them through the prism of probability.
I have no idea, I am ignorant on this matter, I only support causal determinism because it makes the most sense to me.In a classical sense, yes. How do you reconcile casual determinism with modern physics?
wrong. the entire universe was created around the platonic form of me.Who you are is determined solely by two things - genetics and environment. From the day you were born, every aspect of your life was predetermined - your looks, your level of intelligence, your personality and your position in society. What exactly do you mean by "I forge my own destiny"?
Quantum physics says on the most microscopic level, events are probabilistic (Heisenberg uncertainity principle, double-slit experiment). However, on a macroscopic level, we observe the universe is governed by deterministic laws of classical physics. I’m not a scientist but my takeaway has been the quantum probabilities average out on macro level and this gives the way for emergent determinism (the deterministic classical laws of physics are close approximations of reality on a macroscopic level). On a quantum level however, it’s almost impossible to present a case for hard determinism nowadays.I have no idea, I am ignorant on this matter, I only support causal determinism because it makes the most sense to me.
Yes, that makes sense. The Heisenberg uncertainty principle says that it is impossible to measure both the position and momentum of a particle precisely, so we can look at the particle through the prism of probability, but I don't think that the inability to predict the future necessarily means that the future is not predetermined even at the quantum level, does it? My point is that the future has been predetermined in one way or another since the beginning of time, which doesn't necessarily mean that humans or anyone else can predict it, and so, as I've written before, it often makes more sense to look at reality through the prism of probability than to try to find some kind of causal relationship.Quantum physics says on the most microscopic level, events are probabilistic (Heisenberg uncertainity principle, double-slit experiment). However, on a macroscopic level, we observe the universe is governed by deterministic laws of classical physics. I’m not a scientist but my takeaway has been the quantum probabilities average out on macro level and this gives the way for emergent determinism (the deterministic classical laws of physics are close approximations of reality on a macroscopic level). On a quantum level however, it’s almost impossible to present a case for hard determinism nowadays.