Did people always prefer White Features?

PubertyMaxxer

PubertyMaxxer

Face, Height, Frame, Dick
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Posts
14,644
Reputation
18,536
Is it just a eurocentric colonial media thing or do all humans and races equally prefer White Features??
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 27729, angelo and 1 other person
Features like Blue eyes, Light hair/skin is preferred among all Races.

European Caucasian Skull Features are also universally regarded as ideal.

Lightskin Blacks have higher status than dark Bkacls.

Lighter Northeast Asians have higher Status than dark Southeast Asians. HAPAs have higher status than pure Asians.

Has this always been the case, even 1000 years ago??
 
  • +1
Reactions: ๕ඞChick3ncu1ry, Deleted member 27729, Deleted member 26859 and 5 others
Is it just a eurocentric colonial media thing or do all humans and races equally prefer White Features??
Its mainly the latter , but the Eurocentric media did not help . So when it came to the slave trade Arab traders consistently bidded very high for any whites, and this was before any sort of negative media influence.

Now media and societal pressure has hurt minority smv a lot as well. In the crusading era, many white men had wanted to sleep with Arab foids and enjoyed fucking Arab whores.

The Roman Empire and its civilization was multi cultural during its peak extend due to its cities in northern africa which had many Arab people . And their was some inter mixing that resulted in them getting lighter complexion, as well as coupled with richer Arabs mating with white slaves and their offspring being more lighter.

In the USA some white foids slept with Native American men and when the baby was not white looking they got chastised heavily. And the whites referred to the natives as ugly to try to dissuade white foids from sleeping with non white men.

The same tactic was used on a larger scale with blacks in the usa after some white foid got caramel babies from black slaves. This was their way to prevent interaccial dating .

So I would say that interracial dating likely would have been more common if their was no negative media bias against white foids fucking around with minorities, as well as if the roman and greek empires had maintained their empires longer in the Arab regions.

Alexander the Great greatly enjoyed fucking Persian foids, and even had a son with a Persian whore. He also adopted Persian customs. Its likely that If the greeks still ruled today over the Persian empire they would be a lot more interaccial couples of Arabs and greeks.

I would say its 20% Eurocentric bias, and the rest 80% just minorities loving white features and white being just more beautiful
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, PrinceLuenLeoncur, Deleted member 25938 and 3 others
No if abos colonized the world (jfl) then this would be ideal:
B637D6AE A1AC 47C1 A55C E50EBA12D698
 
  • JFL
  • +1
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Erik-Hexum, angelo, Reformed and 10 others
Features like Blue eyes, Light hair/skin is preferred among all Races.

European Caucasian Skull Features are also universally regarded as ideal.

Lightskin Blacks have higher status than dark Bkacls.

Lighter Northeast Asians have higher Status than dark Southeast Asians. HAPAs have higher status than pure Asians.

Has this always been the case, even 1000 years ago??
Colorism became a feature though due to the richer blacks and Arabs and indians staying inside most of the day, and hence their skin was lighter then the " brokies " who were outside doing farm labour and became more dark dude to being int the sun. So it was a way to generate a sort of caste system that still exists.

That being said I do believe their is a genetic element . Minorities have lusted for white foids for a while. Arab slave traders loved white women the most, and even Chinese emperors paid top dollar for white whores to add to their harem.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Erik-Hexum, Sub0 and PubertyMaxxer
Beauty is objective so yes to an extent but you can only really see this when comparing the top 0.1% of attractive people.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PubertyMaxxer
Its mainly the latter , but the Eurocentric media did not help . So when it came to the slave trade Arab traders consistently bidded very high for any whites, and this was before any sort of negative media influence.

Now media and societal pressure has hurt minority smv a lot as well. In the crusading era, many white men had wanted to sleep with Arab foids and enjoyed fucking Arab whores.

The Roman Empire and its civilization was multi cultural during its peak extend due to its cities in northern africa which had many Arab people . And their was some inter mixing that resulted in them getting lighter complexion, as well as coupled with richer Arabs mating with white slaves and their offspring being more lighter.

In the USA some white foids slept with Native American men and when the baby was not white looking they got chastised heavily. And the whites referred to the natives as ugly to try to dissuade white foids from sleeping with non white men.

The same tactic was used on a larger scale with blacks in the usa after some white foid got caramel babies from black slaves. This was their way to prevent interaccial dating .

So I would say that interracial dating likely would have been more common if their was no negative media bias against white foids fucking around with minorities, as well as if the roman and greek empires had maintained their empires longer in the Arab regions.

Alexander the Great greatly enjoyed fucking Persian foids, and even had a son with a Persian whore. He also adopted Persian customs. Its likely that If the greeks still ruled today over the Persian empire they would be a lot more interaccial couples of Arabs and greeks.

I would say its 20% Eurocentric bias, and the rest 80%

just minorities loving white features and white being just more beautiful
Whites are the minority globally (less than 10% and shrinking fast due to low birth rates and feminism ) , not the other way around.

I'd say part of White Features appeal is their rarity, aswell as association with other positive qualities of whites like superior civilizations, resources, intelligence etc.
 
  • +1
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 26859 and AscensionMan98
Whites are the minority globally (less than 10% and shrinking fast due to low birth rates and feminism ) , not the other way around.

I'd say part of White Features appeal is their rarity, aswell as association with other positive qualities of whites like superior civilizations, resources, intelligence etc.
Yea I agree the colonization mogging played a big part in their media success. 100% if Arabs or indians or asians colonized white countries their would be a lot more integration and interaccial dating imo as the wealth mog would result in gold diggers and status charters dating them for the money and status and over time a more gradual integration between the races imo.
 
  • +1
Reactions: ChadFucksYourOneitis and PubertyMaxxer
They colonized everyone and think they're genetically superior since the moment they saw a negro. So it's imposed on every single person as they grow up. It's 100% colonization. Looking at history, people fucked up their own bodies to live up to imposed beauty standards (china footbinding for example).

It just so happens that white is in at the moment. In 1000 years after the annihilation of capitalistic eurocentrism, beauty standards may look extremely different.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: Deleted member 17761, Deleted member 27544, Deleted member 15067 and 4 others
Yea I agree the colonization mogging played a big part in their media success. 100% if Arabs or indians or asians colonized white countries their would be a lot more integration and interaccial dating imo as the wealth mog would result in gold diggers and status charters dating them for the money and status and over time a more gradual integration between the races imo.
Many Very rich Arab and Asian countries, yet they are subhuman in SMV compared to Europoor countries ( economical periphery of Europe like Balkan, EE)
 
  • +1
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose
Its mainly the latter , but the Eurocentric media did not help . So when it came to the slave trade Arab traders consistently bidded very high for any whites, and this was before any sort of negative media influence.

Now media and societal pressure has hurt minority smv a lot as well. In the crusading era, many white men had wanted to sleep with Arab foids and enjoyed fucking Arab whores.

The Roman Empire and its civilization was multi cultural during its peak extend due to its cities in northern africa which had many Arab people . And their was some inter mixing that resulted in them getting lighter complexion, as well as coupled with richer Arabs mating with white slaves and their offspring being more lighter.

In the USA some white foids slept with Native American men and when the baby was not white looking they got chastised heavily. And the whites referred to the natives as ugly to try to dissuade white foids from sleeping with non white men.

The same tactic was used on a larger scale with blacks in the usa after some white foid got caramel babies from black slaves. This was their way to prevent interaccial dating .

So I would say that interracial dating likely would have been more common if their was no negative media bias against white foids fucking around with minorities, as well as if the roman and greek empires had maintained their empires longer in the Arab regions.

Alexander the Great greatly enjoyed fucking Persian foids, and even had a son with a Persian whore. He also adopted Persian customs. Its likely that If the greeks still ruled today over the Persian empire they would be a lot more interaccial couples of Arabs and greeks.

I would say its 20% Eurocentric bias, and the rest 80% just minorities loving white features and white being just more beautiful
No they aren’t because if that were the case men would want white foids the most but it’s only white men who a desired. Whites just have a conquer halo. Races evolved to suit there environment being attracted to a different race in particular doesn’t make sense without some non biological factor
 
  • +1
Reactions: PrinceLuenLeoncur, eyebagcel, LeftPegged and 1 other person
They colonized everyone and think they're genetically superior since the moment they saw a negro. So it's imposed on every single person as they grow up. It's 100% colonization. Looking at history, people fucked up their own bodies to live up to imposed beauty standards (china footbinding for example).

It just so happens that white is in at the moment. In 1000 years after the annihilation of capitalistic eurocentrism, beauty standards may look extremely different.
Yes but you don't realize that Arab slave traders paid the highest premium for white foids. That means before the colonization era their was a white pussy fetish.

 
There's no such thing as eurocentric beauty media standards, you njggas here need to accept that whites have, in fact, the best features. Look at this njgger ascension
images
pjimage-1.jpg


These ones used make-up
article-2502628-195DD4F000000578-262_636x382.jpg
article-2502628-195D566900000578-869_634x448.jpg


Now look at white's being transformed into shitskins using make-up, their smv drops rockbottom
1682323393243
lMKktkqTURBXy8zMGEyNDI1OTI1ZGI2ODViOTJjZDc5ZDdkYmExZTdhYy5qcGVnkpUDAAnNAcLM_ZMFzQMWzQGu
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Woah
Reactions: thecel, Deleted member 16275, ChadFucksYourOneitis and 2 others
what I admire the most about whites is their small nostrils and colored eyes , and light skin

thank god for white people
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: ChetCrispy, Deleted member 1901 and PubertyMaxxer
Whites are the tallest race and have the most sexual dimorphism between the sexes, the largest and most projecting chins, the most projecting midfaces, vertical foreheads, the most projecting noses (without recessed radix and a hook nose like semites) with a narrow alar base, the tallest ramuses, and many more things. These are all skeletal and cartilaginous, I haven't even mentioned anything about skin tone or eye/hair color, and light skin has been nearly universally preferred throughout human civilization because a tan is associated with laboring and light skin is associated with aristocracy.

In order to combat "Eurocentric beauty standards" you would need to enforce a societal preference for more archaic and unattractive features like smaller chins, sloping foreheads, recessed midfaces, and so on, i.e. features whites do not have on average, racially. The Arab explorer and diplomat Ahmad Ibn Fadlan with no prior exposure met the Vikings and was astonished at their physical features. Keep in mind he wasn't just some kind of white worshiper, he lived in the Arab world all his life and even described them as filthy/unhygienic and believed they gave too many rights to women:

I have never seen bodies as nearly perfect as theirs. As tall as palm trees, fair and reddish, they wear neither tunics nor kaftans. Every man wears a cloak with which he covers half of his body, so that one arm is uncovered. They carry axes, swords, daggers and always have them to hand. They use Frankish swords with broad, ridged blades.

Several Romans (emperors, historians) also described Germanics as filthy and uncivilized but admitted they were tall, robust, good looking, etc. And the Romans themselves were white as Italians are today, but even they were very impressed by the looks and physicality of Germanics. When the Japanese first encountered Europeans (Portuguese merchants) they were fascinated with their looks and made many drawings of them - Japanese women were extremely horny for the Portuguese sailors, so much so that many of them were brought back to Europe as wives and concubines. White sex slaves and concubines were always the most prized in the Islamic world, so much so that many caliphs and sultans ended up having blond and red hair because their forefathers' horny lust for white women bleached their own bloodlines.

So we have a very strong pattern here of races who never encountered whites before being impressed with their looks and finding them very attractive, and this pattern has been repeated for thousands of years - far before European dominance and colonialism. This would not happen if whites were not the most inherently attractive race and it was just "MUH COLONIALIST BEAUTY STANDARDS" causing it.
 
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Sprinkles, Erik-Hexum, Deleted member 30461 and 5 others
Whiter skin is seen as more attractive in nearly all cultures, at least on women
Light eyes are better because hoomans are eye centric and if u can see the pupil contracting and dilating its easier to trust someone
 
  • JFL
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose
Whiter skin is seen as more attractive in nearly all cultures, at least on women
Light eyes are better because hoomans are eye centric and if u can see the pupil contracting and dilating its easier to trust someone
It's not just about coloring which is all people ever seen to mention. It's also about the skeleton - BONE.
 
  • +1
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose and PubertyMaxxer
It's not just about coloring which is all people ever seen to mention. It's also about the skeleton - BONE.
Wypeepo have the best balance of masculinity and femininity they look masculine enough to be gl but not ogreish and feminine enough to be beautfiul without being too neotenous and gooky
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 21766
Whites are the tallest race and have the most sexual dimorphism between the sexes, the largest and most projecting chins, the most projecting midfaces, vertical foreheads, the most projecting noses (without recessed radix and a hook nose like semites) with a narrow alar base, the tallest ramuses, and many more things. These are all skeletal and cartilaginous, I haven't even mentioned anything about skin tone or eye/hair color, and light skin has been nearly universally preferred throughout human civilization because a tan is associated with laboring and light skin is associated with aristocracy.

In order to combat "Eurocentric beauty standards" you would need to enforce a societal preference for more archaic and unattractive features like smaller chins, sloping foreheads, recessed midfaces, and so on, i.e. features whites do not have on average, racially. The Arab explorer and diplomat Ahmad Ibn Fadlan with no prior exposure met the Vikings and was astonished at their physical features. Keep in mind he wasn't just some kind of white worshiper, he lived in the Arab world all his life and even described them as filthy/unhygienic and believed they gave too many rights to women:



Several Romans (emperors, historians) also described Germanics as filthy and uncivilized but admitted they were tall, robust, good looking, etc. And the Romans themselves were white as Italians are today, but even they were very impressed by the looks and physicality of Germanics. When the Japanese first encountered Europeans (Portuguese merchants) they were fascinated with their looks and made many drawings of them - Japanese women were extremely horny for the Portuguese sailors, so much so that many of them were brought back to Europe as wives and concubines. White sex slaves and concubines were always the most prized in the Islamic world, so much so that many caliphs and sultans ended up having blond and red hair because their forefathers' horny lust for white women bleached their own bloodlines.

So we have a very strong pattern here of races who never encountered whites before being impressed with their looks and finding them very attractive, and this pattern has been repeated for thousands of years - far before European dominance and colonialism. This would not happen if whites were not the most inherently attractive race and it was just "MUH COLONIALIST BEAUTY STANDARDS" causing it.
Muh dimorphism meanwhile White women have the most bone projection in the masculine regions (nose, brow, jaw)


7322909530a78b3744c21615c6c17049


Nigger doesn't even know what his "own race" looks like (though you're probably curry)
 
Muh dimorphism meanwhile White women have the most bone projection in the masculine regions (nose, brow, jaw)


View attachment 2167498

Nigger doesn't even know what his "own race" looks like (though you're probably curry)
You obviously don't know what sexual dimorphism means, which is "distinct difference in size or appearance between the sexes". White men and white women look more different as sexes than the sexes of any other race. Look at how much more different the skulls of the white man and white woman are compared to the asians and blacks. This is why white trannies have such a hard time passing compared to asian and black trannies - the skulls and bone structures of white men and women are more DISTINCT from each other.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: 6ft4
Traits and features that are harmonious and attractive are just more common in whites
 
You obviously don't know what sexual dimorphism means, which is "distinct difference in size or appearance between the sexes". White men and white women look more different as sexes than the sexes of any other race. Look at how much more different the skulls of the white man and white woman are compared to the asians and blacks. This is why white trannies have such a hard time passing compared to asian and black trannies - the skulls and bone structures of white men and women are more DISTINCT from each other.
If White men are known for having the most masculine facial structure due to bone growth in the masculine regions (and no one debates this), then White women having heavy bone development in these similar regions means that the dimorphism is less pronounced, retard

But the reason non whites can pass better as female trannies is because non whites look more feminine where whites look more masculine. White females who transition to males look indistinguishable from White males otoh
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: XtrovertNTnormalfag
From the front, White men and women both have the tallest skulls. Tall skull is a masculine feature as it is the least neotenous

Product 1597 main main big 1415043931
 
  • +1
Reactions: FutureAestheticMale
No they aren’t because if that were the case men would want white foids the most but it’s only white men who a desired. Whites just have a conquer halo. Races evolved to suit there environment being attracted to a different race in particular doesn’t make sense without some non biological factor
Every brown dude esp and all minorities want white pussy. And ethnic foids all want white cock the most. They do have a conquer halo and people can be attracted to different races regardless of some conquering halo. Look at the average white vs the average Arab. Whether you like it or not the average white mogs the average Arab in terms of overall positive facial features excluding Eurocentric ideals.

With blacks its a bit distorted as color is a Eurocentric ideal as well as slim noses. But even when you factor that whites as a whole still have better facial features
 
Whites are the tallest race and have the most sexual dimorphism between the sexes, the largest and most projecting chins, the most projecting midfaces, vertical foreheads, the most projecting noses (without recessed radix and a hook nose like semites) with a narrow alar base, the tallest ramuses, and many more things. These are all skeletal and cartilaginous, I haven't even mentioned anything about skin tone or eye/hair color, and light skin has been nearly universally preferred throughout human civilization because a tan is associated with laboring and light skin is associated with aristocracy.

In order to combat "Eurocentric beauty standards" you would need to enforce a societal preference for more archaic and unattractive features like smaller chins, sloping foreheads, recessed midfaces, and so on, i.e. features whites do not have on average, racially. The Arab explorer and diplomat Ahmad Ibn Fadlan with no prior exposure met the Vikings and was astonished at their physical features. Keep in mind he wasn't just some kind of white worshiper, he lived in the Arab world all his life and even described them as filthy/unhygienic and believed they gave too many rights to women:



Several Romans (emperors, historians) also described Germanics as filthy and uncivilized but admitted they were tall, robust, good looking, etc. And the Romans themselves were white as Italians are today, but even they were very impressed by the looks and physicality of Germanics. When the Japanese first encountered Europeans (Portuguese merchants) they were fascinated with their looks and made many drawings of them - Japanese women were extremely horny for the Portuguese sailors, so much so that many of them were brought back to Europe as wives and concubines. White sex slaves and concubines were always the most prized in the Islamic world, so much so that many caliphs and sultans ended up having blond and red hair because their forefathers' horny lust for white women bleached their own bloodlines.

So we have a very strong pattern here of races who never encountered whites before being impressed with their looks and finding them very attractive, and this pattern has been repeated for thousands of years - far before European dominance and colonialism. This would not happen if whites were not the most inherently attractive race and it was just "MUH COLONIALIST BEAUTY STANDARDS" causing it.
Yes this exactly. Even when you take into account Eurocentric biases which heavily negate the smv for blacks and East Asians as they have the least similarities to white features, when you take into account the prevalence of good facial features excluding it being part of a race specifically like good cantal thilt, general eye area, jawline, maxilla development, chin projection, the lower third, etc as a % relative to the net population Whites tend to have the highest amount of people with these proper facial features.
 
Why lions are better looking than hienas? People are telling me it's only colonization? Come on now lmao
 
  • +1
Reactions: PoopyFaceTomatoNose, AscensionMan98 and Deleted member 21661
best thing is to be a balck guy with white features
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: FutureAestheticMale
Every brown dude esp and all minorities want white pussy. And ethnic foids all want white cock the most. They do have a conquer halo and people can be attracted to different races regardless of some conquering halo. Look at the average white vs the average Arab. Whether you like it or not the average white mogs the average Arab in terms of overall positive facial features excluding Eurocentric ideals.

With blacks its a bit distorted as color is a Eurocentric ideal as well as slim noses. But even when you factor that whites as a whole still have better facial features
Stop the “white women are desired cope” whites women are subhuman and do the second worse on dating apps only above black women
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Deleted member 23391
Its mainly the latter , but the Eurocentric media did not help . So when it came to the slave trade Arab traders consistently bidded very high for any whites, and this was before any sort of negative media influence.

Now media and societal pressure has hurt minority smv a lot as well. In the crusading era, many white men had wanted to sleep with Arab foids and enjoyed fucking Arab whores.

The Roman Empire and its civilization was multi cultural during its peak extend due to its cities in northern africa which had many Arab people . And their was some inter mixing that resulted in them getting lighter complexion, as well as coupled with richer Arabs mating with white slaves and their offspring being more lighter.

In the USA some white foids slept with Native American men and when the baby was not white looking they got chastised heavily. And the whites referred to the natives as ugly to try to dissuade white foids from sleeping with non white men.

The same tactic was used on a larger scale with blacks in the usa after some white foid got caramel babies from black slaves. This was their way to prevent interaccial dating .

So I would say that interracial dating likely would have been more common if their was no negative media bias against white foids fucking around with minorities, as well as if the roman and greek empires had maintained their empires longer in the Arab regions.

Alexander the Great greatly enjoyed fucking Persian foids, and even had a son with a Persian whore. He also adopted Persian customs. Its likely that If the greeks still ruled today over the Persian empire they would be a lot more interaccial couples of Arabs and greeks.

I would say its 20% Eurocentric bias, and the rest 80% just minorities loving white features and white being just more beautiful
I'm Greek and I love Persian and Middle Eastern women. As well as East African.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscensionMan98
There's no such thing as eurocentric beauty media standards, you njggas here need to accept that whites have, in fact, the best features. Look at this njgger ascension
images
pjimage-1.jpg


These ones used make-up
article-2502628-195DD4F000000578-262_636x382.jpg
article-2502628-195D566900000578-869_634x448.jpg


Now look at white's being transformed into shitskins using make-up, their smv drops rockbottom View attachment 2166135
lMKktkqTURBXy8zMGEyNDI1OTI1ZGI2ODViOTJjZDc5ZDdkYmExZTdhYy5qcGVnkpUDAAnNAcLM_ZMFzQMWzQGu
Wtf the black American who used makeup looks like a fairy tale big chinned prince or main male character lol who dates the mc female. Wtfff lollll
 
There is no preference for nerdics except among curries.
Med, Balkan, Turkish men mog nerdics into oblivion.
Also, nerdics are not benchmark of europeans, they were the least ones in europe to adopt civilization (which is Roman).
They were poor untill second part of past century.
Anglos aren't nerdics, and neither are germans btw.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: Crusile and AscensionMan98
There is no preference for nerdics except among curries.
Med, Balkan, Turkish men mog nerdics into oblivion.
Also, nerdics are not benchmark of europeans, they were the least ones in europe to adopt civilization (which is Roman).
They were poor untill second part of past century.
Anglos aren't nerdics, and neither are germans btw.
Wrong. Northern Germans and Dutch Men do have the biggest bone mass, height and most desired & yet rarest Coloring.
 
  • +1
Reactions: AscensionMan98
only some european features are considered ideal, hooding/deep set eyes, light coloration, high cheekbones, and thin noses for example, but others are considered recessed, most europeans have relatively flat faces from the side for example, their upper lip doesn't protrude much.

this forum is mostly ethnics picking and choosing caucasian features, and the examples they use of 'ideal development' doesn't correlate with what they express in words, cavill is often coined as ideal development for example, but like almost everyome from his ancestry he has a flat upper lip + nasolabial folds which they argue are unattractive.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862, Crusile and inceI
No they aren’t because if that were the case men would want white foids the most but it’s only white men who a desired. Whites just have a conquer halo. Races evolved to suit there environment being attracted to a different race in particular doesn’t make sense without some non biological factor
white foids are the most desired too, bleached northeast asian foids or very light white pasing latinas are the only non-white foids that can even compete, and it is due to their proximity to whiteness through having light features.

in fact, women tolerate non-white features more considering how much they fuck negros and darker latinos compared to the other way around.
 
If White men are known for having the most masculine facial structure due to bone growth in the masculine regions (and no one debates this), then White women having heavy bone development in these similar regions means that the dimorphism is less pronounced, retard

But the reason non whites can pass better as female trannies is because non whites look more feminine where whites look more masculine. White females who transition to males look indistinguishable from White males otoh
i wouldn't say one race is necessairly more masculine or feminine than the other, whites or other caucasoids like arabs simply have sharper features than rounder, but even white kids have slightly sharper features than asian or black kids tbh
 
Stop the “white women are desired cope” whites women are subhuman and do the second worse on dating apps only above black women
the dating apps are based on nothing but how skinny a group of woman is, asians are the skinniest, and blacks are the most obese (on average) with whites being the second fattest. give a man obese asian and skinny black girl and most non-fetish crazed dudes will pick the black skinny one.

it is different for women since they care more about face or status or height compared to purely being skinny with no other bonus (give a man chuby or fat foid with stacy face vs normie girl with skinny body, second will win, but a slightly chubby with chad face will most likely beat skinny normie guy) plus white men and black men are a little less morbidly obese than their female counterparts.

look at porn or onlyfans, it is SKINNY caucasoid women who are the most desired.
 
Last edited:
  • Ugh..
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 24940 and Deleted member 24507
i wouldn't say one race is necessairly more masculine or feminine than the other, whites or other caucasoids like arabs simply have sharper features than rounder, but even white kids have slightly sharper features than asian or black kids tbh
White features get "sharp" with age I suppose. White children frequently have pig pheno.

But Whites and Arabs barely have features in common so I don't know what you're referring to. Most often Arabs and Whites have near opposite features. Whites don't tend to low foreheads, heavy UEE, full lips, narrow IPD, long midfaces, fleshy nose, and narrow skulls. Basically features that are rare if not absent in Whites.

Anyway the point is that it isn't about feature sharpness. Whites have more bone growth in masculine areas and White women have more facial bone than any other girls when compared by race. And Whites being the least neotenous race are be default less feminine looking.
 
White features get sharp with age. White children frequently have pig pheno.

But Whites and Arabs barely have features in common so I don't know what you're referring to. Most often Arabs and Whites have near opposite features. Whites don't tend to low foreheads, heavy UEE, full lips, narrow IPD, long midfaces, and narrow skulls.

Anyway the point is that it isn't about feature sharpness. Whites have more bone growth in masculine areas and White women have more facial bone than any other girls.
arab girls often have worse noses than whites tbh and are hairier, albeit more feminine frames and eyes than white girls so it balances out.

that being said, today's beauty standards aren't according to dimorphism, light skin, light eyes and pink nipples etc. are literally a result of not receiving enough estrogen on puberty on avg yet men are obsessed with lighter featues(probably due to neoteny but still) blacks with their round features, curvy bodies etc. are preferred less than their men/boys who aren't as sharp as white men/boys etc.

you can theorize why this is, but the simple fact is, even if white women are arguably more masculine, men like them more than the purely feminine featured races of women.
 
arab girls often have worse noses than whites tbh and are hairier, albeit more feminine frames and eyes than white girls so it balances out.

that being said, today's beauty standards aren't according to dimorphism, light skin, light eyes and pink nipples etc. are literally a result of not receiving enough estrogen on puberty on avg yet men are obsessed with lighter featues(probably due to neoteny but still) blacks with their round features, curvy bodies etc. are preferred less than their men/boys who aren't as sharp as white men/boys etc.

you can theorize why this is, but the simple fact is, even if white women are arguably more masculine, men like them more than the purely feminine featured races of women.
White girls frequently have pig noses though so not a fair comparison. Big nose failo is an ethnic trait caused by weak jaw or fleshy nose.

White girls fog from a body perspective though. Very feminine and they avoid the prepubescent girl failo of Asians or the super athletic look of Blacks. White girls have a purely feminine body in terms of proportion and fat storage
 
great thread, i love these discussions
 
White girls frequently have pig noses though so not a fair comparison. Big nose failo is an ethnic trait caused by weak jaw or fleshy nose.

White girls fog from a body perspective though. Very feminine and they avoid the prepubescent girl failo of Asians or the super athletic look of Blacks. White girls have a purely feminine body in terms of proportion and fat storage
in either case though, why do you think white girls have the highest smv despite having most ''masc'' features on avg?

also dimorphism doesn't necessairly mean the men are most masculine or the women are most feminine, it simply means that you are less likely to have members of opposite sex look similar to each other.
 
If White men are known for having the most masculine facial structure due to bone growth in the masculine regions (and no one debates this), then White women having heavy bone development in these similar regions means that the dimorphism is less pronounced, retard

But the reason non whites can pass better as female trannies is because non whites look more feminine where whites look more masculine. White females who transition to males look indistinguishable from White males otoh
passing as a ftm troon is easier in general than the reverse since feminization is easier to undo than masculinization.

that being said, without t injections or lowered estrogen etc. into consideration and such, i've honestly mistaken asian women for boys more often than white women.
 
the dating apps are based on nothing but how skinny a group of woman is, asians are the skinniest, and blacks are the most obese (on average) with whites being the second fattest. give a man obese asian and skinny black girl and most non-fetish crazed dudes will pick the black skinny one.

it is different for women since they care more about face or status or height compared to purely being skinny with no other bonus (give a man chuby or fat foid with stacy face vs normie girl with skinny body, second will win, but a slightly chubby with chad face will most likely beat skinny normie guy) plus white men and black men are a little less morbidly obese than their female counterparts.

look at porn or onlyfans, it is SKINNY caucasoid women who are the most desired.

I laughed so hard at you using porn when pornstars are prostitutes and that’s nothing to brag about. That means you’re the easiest women to fornicate with and all nations of men know Edomite (so-called White) women are the easiest women to fornicate with. It has nothing to do with being “desired.” Porn is about fornication not whatever delusions you’re talking about.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 8365

Similar threads

D
Replies
12
Views
210
yogurto
Y
truecel_4
Replies
17
Views
197
copercel123
copercel123
SamosaChutneyCel
Replies
23
Views
760
SamosaChutneyCel
SamosaChutneyCel
Eärendil
Replies
9
Views
125
TheLightOfMyLife
TheLightOfMyLife
klip11
Replies
2
Views
75
loyolaxavvierretard
loyolaxavvierretard

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top