IHATEINDIANS
jai hind
- Joined
- Nov 6, 2024
- Posts
- 4,401
- Reputation
- 7,956
Obviously one of, if not the biggest legitimate proofs to the Blackpill is data from dating apps, all showing that women rate men very low on average compared to how men rate women on nearly a perfect bellcurve, and how harsh women filter out men by height (both OkCupid IIRC?)
These seem to be accepted as true in the case for all scenarios, even beyond online dating. I am wondering whether you all think it is fair that sentiments like "under 6ft=death in all of dating because of this data" is fair, or if it is heavily inflated because of the nature of online dating.
Obviously, no matter what, it is brutal and it shows how women's minds work, but in my opinion I find it to be inflated heavily compared to IRL. Since men in general sadly have low standards, and dating apps making them 50x more accessible to women, the average for them becomes a 7/10 looking man, since filters and algorithms allow them to bypass all men below like a 6/10 at all without even needing swiping.
In dating in REAL life (especially outside college/rich areas), the amount of chuds outnumber the chads at an enormous scale, easily thousands of men below a 5 for every one above LHTN/MHTN. Obviously there is no automatic filter, women are forced to reject high ego 5'6 subhumans quite regularly. Therefore a 5.5/10 man looks MUCH better than on a dating app. And that doesn't even consider the fact you also get the chance to use charisma and emotional manipulation beforehand to try and attract her even more.
IMO, once a woman ever touches a dating app it is GAME OVER for non GL men who want her. Once she discovers how easy it is to get railed by Chad on a daily basis, she will never, ever double think rejecting the average height MTN who asked her out. But, of course, in many societies the vast majority of women do NOT use dating apps, especially if they enroll in college until they really need to find a partner easily, like 26+.
This is likely temporary as more and more women discover how well online datings lets them conduct their instinctual eugenics, but at least for now it stands.
These seem to be accepted as true in the case for all scenarios, even beyond online dating. I am wondering whether you all think it is fair that sentiments like "under 6ft=death in all of dating because of this data" is fair, or if it is heavily inflated because of the nature of online dating.
Obviously, no matter what, it is brutal and it shows how women's minds work, but in my opinion I find it to be inflated heavily compared to IRL. Since men in general sadly have low standards, and dating apps making them 50x more accessible to women, the average for them becomes a 7/10 looking man, since filters and algorithms allow them to bypass all men below like a 6/10 at all without even needing swiping.
In dating in REAL life (especially outside college/rich areas), the amount of chuds outnumber the chads at an enormous scale, easily thousands of men below a 5 for every one above LHTN/MHTN. Obviously there is no automatic filter, women are forced to reject high ego 5'6 subhumans quite regularly. Therefore a 5.5/10 man looks MUCH better than on a dating app. And that doesn't even consider the fact you also get the chance to use charisma and emotional manipulation beforehand to try and attract her even more.
IMO, once a woman ever touches a dating app it is GAME OVER for non GL men who want her. Once she discovers how easy it is to get railed by Chad on a daily basis, she will never, ever double think rejecting the average height MTN who asked her out. But, of course, in many societies the vast majority of women do NOT use dating apps, especially if they enroll in college until they really need to find a partner easily, like 26+.
This is likely temporary as more and more women discover how well online datings lets them conduct their instinctual eugenics, but at least for now it stands.
