do good ratios automatically equal a good face

[axttt_]

surely someone with mostly ideal ratios has to be pretty good looking and good ratios usually = good features too

 

[Zenis]

surely someone with mostly ideal ratios has to be pretty good looking and good ratios usually = good features too

Fuck no, you can have good ratios but a boneless cuck

You need featuures and bones as well

 

[axttt_]

Fuck no, you can have good ratios but a boneless cuck

You need featuures and bones as well

but if u had ideal jaw width wouldnt that mean ur not that boneless also ideal ratios means a good pfl so you must have compact eye shape which comes from good bones and good fwhr etc

 

[IAMNOTANINCEL]

Yes. I made a quick sketch and this is the ugliest face with good ratios i could come up with

The only bad features i could include were upper eyelid exposure, bad undereyes, bad nose (mostly only from the side), weird lips and a recessed chin which can only really be seen from the side. (also imagine him with an aspie stare)
You could add more bad soft features like acne and norwooding but thats unfair, this is a craniofacial discussion.
Some bad features are just straight up impossible to have because for them to have good ratios it just has to be that way, for example scleral show.