Do u think eugenics are moral?

Lonenely sigma

Lonenely sigma

Future "username-o-plasty" candidate
Joined
Oct 22, 2022
Posts
8,364
Reputation
17,390
Is it moral that I’m a 32 year old virgin NEET?

Until a white girls loves me I won’t support any injustice
 
Is it moral that I’m a 32 year old virgin NEET?

Until a white girls loves me I won’t support any injustice
I mean if everyone is genetically ideal then there's no injustice in the first place right?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7580
every organism on earth selects for favorable characteristics.

eugenics are just a fact of evolution.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 6128, Deleted member 15854 and Deleted member 25938
every organism on earth selects for favorable characteristics.

eugenics are just a fact of evolution.
yea but i meant if we took matters into our own hands and purposely made the top 5% breed while the rest of us don't thus creating the perfect people and removing inceldom
 
Eugenics is a flawed man made theory fantasized over by jewish scientist. Natural lifestyle is what gives good genes not breeding programs
doubt jews would fantasize bout it jfl
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 7580
yea but i meant if we took matters into our own hands and purposely made the top 5% breed while the rest of us don't thus creating the perfect people and removing inceldom
is already happening, you don't need to force that, ugly men don't tend to breed in modern society, the only reason they're still around is because historically this wasn't the case.

even if fat people have children for example, each generation is exponentially more likely to be the last because they won't find a partner due to being ugly, same thing happens to people who select their partners for 'personality' or any other non-physical trait, it makes it harder for their children to find mates, which leads to a downward spiral of settling for less, which means each passing generation is uglier until the lineage just stops, that's where we're at in the modern world, many incels are the result of boomers and gen x failing to exercise mate selection, they married for non-physical characteristics, as a result their children are recessed.
 
Last edited:
  • +1
Reactions: mayo mogger and Deleted member 69862
I was musing over eugenics just a few minutes ago. We must weed out the undesired genes in order to accelerate the process of human evolution.

Positive characteristics are majorly inheritable, such as intelligence, empathy, industriousness, athleticism, physical attractiveness, and so on. As it turns out, negative characteristics are also majorly inheritable.

So what should sane people do? Sow the best seeds for progress. Sterilize people with defective genes and incentivize superior people to reproduce more than inferior people. This is for the common good.

I am a eugenicist. Everybody is to some extent. Nobody is willing to breed with the biggest subhuman, lowlife out there. Nobody wants their children to be genetic trash. So why not use eugenics in our favor?
 
  • +1
Reactions: Lonenely sigma
is already happening, you don't need to force that, ugly men don't tend to breed in modern society, the only reason they're still around is because historically this wasn't the case.

even if fat people have children for example, each generation is exponentially more likely to be the last because they won't find a partner due to being ugly, same thing happens to people who select their partners for 'personality' or any other non-physical trait, it makes it harder for their children to find mates, which leads to a downward spiral of settling for less, which means each passing generation is uglier until the lineage just stops, that's where we're at in the modern world, many incels are the result of boomers and gen x failing to exercise mate selection, they married for non-physical characteristics, as a result their children are recessed.
Yeah, but its too slow. Most people don't even know what makes a face attractive - the chance is that the bones of the said person are average and that they are attractive bc of a certain characteristic that stands out. The problem with this is that, unless a person has very good bones, nobody can guarantee that their kids will look good too. Two people with average bones can produce a chad and a complete subhuman, and it only depends on the genetic recombination. If we wait until genetic recombination eliminates most of people, there will be tens or even hundreds of generations more that will suffer, and incels in every next one will suffer more than in the previous one bc they will be even a smaller minority. Thats why I think we should accelerate it
 
I was musing over eugenics just a few minutes ago. We must weed out the undesired genes in order to accelerate the process of human evolution.

Positive characteristics are majorly inheritable, such as intelligence, empathy, industriousness, athleticism, physical attractiveness, and so on. As it turns out, negative characteristics are also majorly inheritable.

So what should sane people do? Sow the best seeds for progress. Sterilize people with defective genes and incentivize superior people to reproduce more than inferior people. This is for the common good.

I am a eugenicist. Everybody is to some extent. Nobody is willing to breed with the biggest subhuman, lowlife out there. Nobody wants their children to be genetic trash. So why not use eugenics in our favor?
I agree 100%. Eliminating an entire generation of genes, even if thats billions of people, is thousands of times more humane than keeping those genes circulating, thus ruining lives of tens or even hundreds of billions in the future.
 
No, unless nootropics are being offered to a specific population to enhance epigenetic neuroplasticity.

WIN 20230320 16 55 37 Scan


2023 03 21 15 38 38


...


Eugenic Reality:

0091-009.png


207
 
Last edited:
Abortion doesn’t have much moral or sensible reason other than the convenience of the parent yet its going on regardless. Eugenics is often based in logic and intentions of positive outcomes, yet people think it’s immoral 🤦‍♂️
 
Last edited:
Eugenics is just a stupid cope for the jews
 
is already happening, you don't need to force that, ugly men don't tend to breed in modern society, the only reason they're still around is because historically this wasn't the case.

even if fat people have children for example, each generation is exponentially more likely to be the last because they won't find a partner due to being ugly, same thing happens to people who select their partners for 'personality' or any other non-physical trait, it makes it harder for their children to find mates, which leads to a downward spiral of settling for less, which means each passing generation is uglier until the lineage just stops, that's where we're at in the modern world, many incels are the result of boomers and gen x failing to exercise mate selection, they married for non-physical characteristics, as a result their children are recessed.
That’s not true outside Western Europe

Zoomers here are faaaar uglier than young people in 90s

Even biggest chad chasing sluts here end up starting family with a 5’4 pajeet with a stable career
 
eugenics is associated with nazism, racism, white supremacy etc.
 
Morals are for losers and cucks
 
Not only moral but inevitable.

We’ve done it to every other species but ourselves and the technology for it is already there and rapidly developing.


The lack of natural selection will hurt our species not to mention lower intelligent people nowadays reproduce the most, this is disastrous.

Whether or not it’ll be implemented across the board or safeguarded and reserved for the elite is yet to be known
 
Even biggest chad chasing sluts here end up starting family with a 5’4 pajeet with a stable career
I was recently told a story about some italians that geomaxxed to my country to slay as romantic latins, it's been 4 years and they've got zero lays, they're also 5'5 and balding janitor pheno.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 69862 and Deleted member 7580
They're laughing at your bone structure
 

Similar threads

yvesxyves
Discussion Eugenics
Replies
2
Views
38
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
DeborahAnnWollFARTS
Brava
Replies
28
Views
270
Brava
Brava
greylord
Replies
40
Views
171
James holder
James holder
xevuxia
Replies
2
Views
29
zalcus
zalcus
Incelforeever
Replies
8
Views
63
catastropy
catastropy

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top