Do you believe in any god?

[Deleted member 5048]

also whatever you voted, are you a spiritual person?

 

[Deleted member 685]

Fuck no

 

[NaturalDisaster]

Why would i need a god to believe in? has any god ever believed in me? (finger point)

 

[Alt Number 3]

I know god loves me.

 

[WadlowMaxxing]

Nope a big explosion just magically created our existence

 

[6’1cel]

also whatever you voted, are you a spiritual person?

fuk no lol
im not a brainlet

 

[Deleted member 5048]

fuk no lol
im not a brainlet

good for you

Spirituality 'link' to mental illness

'Spiritual people are more likely to be mentally ill' is today’s claim in the Daily Mail. They report on research which found that people with a spiritual views, but without conventional religious beliefs, had an increased risk of mental health problems…

www.nhs.uk

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Nope a big explosion just magically created our existence

I agree but unironically

 

[Deleted member 685]

There are about 3000 "God's" out there that people believed in. Christians, Muslims and jews don't believe in 2999 of them, I just don't believe in 1 more of them.

 

[john2]

Yes and yes.

 

[Deleted member 10524]

I am a believer when around Christian chicks

 

[Deleted member 685]

 

[Blackout.xl]

I agree but unironically

Lmfao

 

[Deleted member 6273]

I am a believer when around Christian chicks

based

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Lmfao

problem

 

[Deleted member 685]

Nope a big explosion just magically created our existence

That's an extremely simplified version of explaining the origin of the universe, which totally ignores the fact the universe is still expanding at an accelerating rate, which indicates there used to be a point where everything was together.

 

[NaturalDisaster]

There are about 3000 "God's" out there that people believed in. Christians, Muslims and jews don't believe in 2999 of them, I just don't believe in 1 more of them.

 

[Deleted member 1338]

I don't really believe or disbelief in god. There is no proof if he exists or if he doesn't.

 

[Hated subhuman]

also whatever you voted, are you a spiritual person?

seems like cope, no reason to believe he's made my life a living hell

 

[Deleted member 6400]

Vishnu

 

[Deleted member 685]

View attachment 822160

Meanwhile @ArvidGustavsson is an atheist and could probably fuck your Christian sister and mom at the same time

 

[Blackout.xl]

problem

Yes

A random explosion with no background is unlikely

 

[Blackout.xl]

Meanwhile @ArvidGustavsson is an atheist and could probably fuck your Christian sister and mom at the same time

He’s too autistic to even leave his room

 

[nonserviam]

yes i do, but mainly because i wanna cope with after life
things we do on earth must have consequences

 

[Deleted]

Meanwhile @ArvidGustavsson is an atheist and could probably fuck your Christian sister and mom at the same time

 

[Deleted member 5048]

seems like cope, no reason to believe he's made my life a living hell

about that in church I've heard that God doesn't give you the pain that you can't take, but why people suicide then

 

[Deleted]

That's an extremely simplified version of explaining the origin of the universe, which totally ignores the fact the universe is still expanding at an accelerating rate, which indicates there used to be a point where everything was together.

Soys be like ”well an explosion seems to complicated and weird. A naked man in the sky deciding you to put in a burning shit hole or a cloud city depending on how you act doesn’t seem like the gouverment trying to Keep us in check at all”

religion is basically people beliving something because they’re told to and don’t require any proof its kind of like with flat earth and just denying facts

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Yes

A random explosion with no background is unlikely

That's where the scientific evidence leads lol. What's more likely a scientific theorem which has a mathematical background and is sound in regards to physics or an omnipotent, omnipresent, ominicinent and invisible being with 0 evidence outside of anecdotes and equally has no origin.

 

[Deleted member 685]

Yes

A random explosion with no background is unlikely

Why could it not be random? Most of the research we have indicates to a big bang where these molecules were together (Expansion of the universe, cosmic microwave background) The earth being 6000 years old is relatively unlikely too, especially since the Christian God has made an exceptionally bad effort trying to reveal itself to mankind and an insane amount of fundamental beliefs the Abrahamic religions kept for centuries have been proven to be scientifically illiterate.

 

[Hated subhuman]

about that in church I've heard that God doesn't give you the pain that you can't take, but why people suicide then

they say they were misled, when the majority of people are misled because of god jfl

 

[Deleted member 685]

Soys be like ”well an explosion seems to complicated and weird. A naked man in the sky deciding you to put in a burning shit hole or a cloud city depending on how you act doesn’t seem like the gouverment trying to Keep us in check at all”

religion is basically people beliving something because they’re told to and don’t require any proof its kind of like with flat earth and just denying facts

Sad truth is the great majority of religious people are religious because they were born in a religious household. Meanwhile science etc actually gives kids a REASON and explanation to believe in things like evolution.

 

[Blackout.xl]

That's where the scientific evidence leads lol. What's more likely a scientific theorem which has a mathematical background and is sound in regards to physics or an omnipotent, omnipresent, ominicinent and invisible being with 0 evidence outside of anecdotes and equally has no origin.

The scientific evidence doesn’t lead anywhere near a random explosion. Science if anything is ambiguous on the subject, which is why religiously motivated arguments (such as the first cause and fine tuning argument) are able to be based on principals accepted by the scientific field.

 

[NaturalDisaster]

Sad truth is the great majority of religious people are religious because they were born in a religious household.

How 99% of the people don't realize that is beyond me.

 

[AbandonShip]

Sad truth is the great majority of religious people are religious because they were born in a religious household. Meanwhile science etc actually gives kids a REASON and explanation to believe in things like evolution.

Science wont fix your midface. Jesus might

 

[Blackout.xl]

Why could it not be random? Most of the research we have indicates to a big bang where these molecules were together (Expansion of the universe, cosmic microwave background) The earth being 6000 years old is relatively unlikely too, especially since the Christian God has made an exceptionally bad effort trying to reveal itself to mankind and an insane amount of fundamental beliefs the Abrahamic religions kept for centuries have been proven to be scientifically illiterate.

Big Bang =\= random explosion with no background

Big Bang is just the tip of the ice berg when it comes to the origin of the universe as well, even within the field of science

 

[Eduardo DOV]

most of you here are extremely ignorant and negative people. I used to be like that, when you are like that you think you are much smarter than the others.

 

[john2]

Big Bang =\= random explosion with no background

Agreed. Even scientifically that sounds impossible since it denies cause and effect.

 

[Deleted member 685]

The scientific evidence doesn’t lead anywhere near a random explosion. Science if anything is ambiguous on the subject, which is why religiously motivated arguments (such as the first cause and fine tuning argument) are able to be based on principals accepted by the scientific field.

Why do you keep using the word random as if it's of extreme relevance? Thousands of random things happen every single second. Random doesn't mean illogical.

If anything the fine tuning argument is illogical and holds close to no ground compared to actual theories which thousands of scientists agree on. If your concept of a creator is all powerful and all good, why are things like volcanos, hurricanes, tornados, earthquakes, disease and birth defects etc such a thing? Either he's not all good, or he's not all powerful.

 

[AbandonShip]

Big Bang =\= random explosion with no background

Big Bang is just the tip of the ice berg when it comes to the origin of the universe as well, even within the field of science

This is true. Scientists dont know what happened before big bang.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

The scientific evidence doesn’t lead anywhere near a random explosion. Science if anything is ambiguous on the subject, which is why religiously motivated arguments (such as the first cause and fine tuning argument) are able to be based on principals accepted by the scientific field.

Just totally ignore cosmology theory. I'm not saying it's a fact but it's the most scientifically supported theory on the origin of the universe.

 

[Kaworu]

also whatever you voted, are you a spiritual person?

your mom worships my dick

 

[Kaworu]

Agreed. Even scientifically that sounds impossible since it denies cause and effect.

hey broski

 

[AbandonShip]

Just totally ignore cosmology theory. I'm not saying it's a fact but it's the most scientifically supported theory on the origin of the universe.

science can suck my dick. Allah mogs. Science is haram and gay

 

[Deleted member 685]

Big Bang =\= random explosion with no background

Big Bang is just the tip of the ice berg when it comes to the origin of the universe as well, even within the field of science

Alot of things are still the tip of the ice berg when you realize it's only been like 500 years since Newton and how old the earth is, and how new science is. And that would just mean it's now a purposeful explosion with background, which boils down mostly to wether God exists which we have no scientific observations for. That's why we call it a random explosion, since there's no greater conscious observable purpose behind it.

 

[Deleted member 6273]

Agreed. Even scientifically that sounds impossible since it denies cause and effect.

It's hypothesized that prior to the big bang space and time didn't exist.

 

[Deleted member 685]

Science wont fix your midface. Jesus might

Stay quiet

 

[AbandonShip]

Stay quiet

why the long face bro?

 

[Deleted member 685]

You are ignoring content by this member. Show ignored content

 

[RAITEIII]

also whatever you voted, are you a spiritual person?

I do but he does not go out of his way to help me not end up on the FUCKING STREET

 

[john2]

It's hypothesized that prior to the big bang space and time didn't exist.

What does that have to do with a cause?
Are you trying to imply that in order for a cause to exist, there needs to be space and time?