do you support eugenics?

Do you support eugenics


  • Total voters
    21
IHATEINDIANS

IHATEINDIANS

It is what it is
Joined
Nov 6, 2024
Posts
3,292
Reputation
5,834
Sounds kind of fucked up on paper but imagine how much the average person's life would improve if we all had top tier genetics.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, DravidianFootjob and fr0st
Sounds kind of fucked up on paper but imagine how much the average person's life would improve if we all had top tier genetics.
If we all had top tier genetics then we would find new beauty standards. if you have a society of very attractive people then naturally we will find a unique feature to highlight ie the way we value blue eyes and blond hair.
 
  • +1
  • JFL
  • Ugh..
Reactions: Underdog9494, davidlaidisme67, TiktokUser and 3 others
Yes, and I think that Hitler was an underrated genius who could have solved the inceldom
 
  • +1
  • Love it
  • Woah
Reactions: Underdog9494, Debetro, TiktokUser and 1 other person
eugenics is natural
 
  • +1
Reactions: Underdog9494, TiktokUser, DravidianFootjob and 1 other person
If we all had top tier genetics then we would find new beauty standards. if you have a society of very attractive people then naturally we will find a unique feature to highlight ie the way we value blue eyes and blond hair.
My beauty standart will always be you❤️
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: Underdog9494 and fr0st
  • +1
  • Love it
Reactions: Underdog9494, DravidianFootjob and recai iskender
Some girls called me fine today it doesnt count though they were like thirteen bitches that age find anything attractive
Jb slayer
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: DravidianFootjob and fr0st
Sounds kind of fucked up on paper but imagine how much the average person's life would improve if we all had top tier genetics.
Human gene editing/engineering sounds far more superior
 
  • +1
Reactions: R@m@, IHATEINDIANS and gr34ter
If we all had top tier genetics then we would find new beauty standards. if you have a society of very attractive people then naturally we will find a unique feature to highlight ie the way we value blue eyes and blond hair.
Low iq self-centred take. Improving the gene pool will not suddenly make HTNS become LTNS, same way how if you eat only good foods, the foods dont become shit they still taste good. Its just that HTNS will be more common. Only thing is that the ceiling to be slayer will increase but life overall will be better, not to mention the fact that we could prevent diseases and shit.
 
  • +1
  • Hmm...
Reactions: TiktokUser, IHATEINDIANS and fr0st
Low iq self-centred take. Improving the gene pool will not suddenly make HTNS become LTNS, same way how if you eat only good foods, the foods dont become shit they still taste good. Its just that HTNS will be more common. Only thing is that the ceiling to be slayer will increase but life overall will be better, not to mention the fact that we could prevent diseases and shit.
If this idea was applied to literally anything else it would be detrimental. if the gene pool widdles down eventually humans will look for a hierarchy to latch onto if you said this about the economy apply this logic to economics. Humans are naturally drawn to rarity thats why blue is statistically the most liked color its because its the rarest in nature i could go into science and neurology but that would be a waste of time.
 
  • Ugh..
Reactions: TiktokUser
If this idea was applied to literally anything else it would be detrimental. if the gene pool widdles down eventually humans will look for a hierarchy to latch onto if you said this about the economy apply this logic to economics. Humans are naturally drawn to rarity thats why blue is statistically the most liked color its because its the rarest in nature i could go into science and neurology but that would be a waste of time.
Ironically you didn't even negate my points. And comparing economics to something like beauty is a straw man. One is an objective measure and another subjective. I don't understand how that can be detrimental? Care to elaborate? If you are referring to eye color per say, the rarest eye color is in fact not blue. To be honest, I do agree to you to an extent but a traditional economic model cannot be applied to the hierarchy of looks. And epigenetics functions beyond looks, it can make everyone be normal and healthy, then do you still suggest a shift would happen? That normal people would be considered abnormal?

(sorry if my english is bad, typed it in a hurry)
 
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser
If we all had top tier genetics then we would find new beauty standards. if you have a society of very attractive people then naturally we will find a unique feature to highlight ie the way we value blue eyes and blond hair.
We need to have better genetics though, it’s not about solely beauty but intelligence
 
  • +1
Reactions: cornerd nerd
Its not real
 
Human consciousness is overated
 
Sounds kind of fucked up on paper but imagine how much the average person's life would improve if we all had top tier genetics.
The thing is it would genuinely be impossible if we all had top tier genetics. But eugenics is decided based on women’s preferences not ours :feelskek:
 
  • +1
Reactions: TiktokUser

Similar threads

Gr8
Replies
12
Views
462
enlightful
enlightful
TheVoidInside
Replies
2
Views
94
TheVoidInside
TheVoidInside
jed9
Replies
7
Views
246
Gamerspyy786
Gamerspyy786
The Grinch
Replies
90
Views
911
Gengar
Gengar

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top