Do you support forced looksmatched monogamy?

[Xangsane]

That way:

• Pair bonding won't be fucked up for both women and Chadlite+
• Slayers don't hog women, women don't cry after being pumped and dumped
• Healthier relationships

 

[Xangsane]

@delonregen @tombradylover

 

[Xangsane]

@chaddyboi66

 

[chadintraining]

That way:

• Pair bonding won't be fucked up for both women and Chadlite+
• Slayers don't hog women, women don't cry after being pumped and dumped
• Healthier relationships

Would promote men to not work if they were promised a woman

Hypergamy paired with the bluepill and redpill is needed for men to work

 

[gooner23]

 

[Xangsane]

Would promote men to not work if they were promised a woman

Hypergamy paired with the bluepill and redpill is needed for men to work

What do you mean

 

[Xangsane]

?

 

[chaddyboi66]

That way:

• Pair bonding won't be fucked up for both women and Chadlite+
• Slayers don't hog women, women don't cry after being pumped and dumped
• Healthier relationships

These are two separate ideas.

The first idea of limiting potential partners to only your own relative looksmatched level does seem interesting. However, room ought to be made [at least on paper anyway] for the occasional exception to this rule where proof of genuine care/affection and "love", beyond simply just attraction based on looks, can be verified.

The latter concept doesn't matter as much as the former; neither idea would be very popular especially when put together.

 

[Xangsane]

These are two separate ideas.

The first idea of limiting potential partners to only your own relative looksmatched level does seem interesting. However, room ought to be made [at least on paper anyway] for the occasional exception to this rule where proof of genuine care/affection and "love", beyond simply just attraction based on looks, can be verified.

The latter concept doesn't matter as much as the former; neither idea would be very popular especially when put together.

What would be more a popular idea with the aim to balance laycounts among the population?

 

[Deleted member 30037]

Virgin looksmatch are the only way to pair bond it’s a fact

 

[Xangsane]

Virgin looksmatch are the only way to pair bond it’s a fact

I get pissed off when both women and men are promiscuous. REALLY pissed off

 

[chaddyboi66]

What would be more a popular idea with the aim to balance laycounts among the population?

A promotion of the idea that looks genuinely don't matter; rather looks shouldn't matter and you shouldn't pick your partner primarily based on that especially outside of your own league.

It'd need a massive psyop campaign and potentially some state or big lobby support too tbh, not to mention you'd have to run it for a while to un-fuck dating dynamics too.

 

[Deleted member 51781]

Sounds dystopic. Anything that takes my liberty away is a big no.

 

[chaddyboi66]

Do you support eugenics

Do you think that short men/women should be allowed to create even shorter men or should anyone with bad genetics be made infertile. This also apply to anything genetic including low iq and non NTness and why do/don't you support it

looksmax.org

When do you think yearly bodycount was the lowest in the last 20 years?

Do you think with the rise of dating apps and social media a foids yearly body count has increased or decreased? There's two arguments I can see 1) Dating apps and social media make it incredibly easy to find chads, so every night a new chad is running through her 2) Now that it's easier than...

looksmax.org

You won't have a committed relationship. Let me explain you why.

It's over for most men. Being a man and average is no longer a viable option in 2024. Any claim to the contrary is a cope and reality denial. Average men, generally speaking, can't get a date online or in real-life. Modern women, even these who are average, are aimed at top guys. Average women...

looksmax.org

All women by age 23 are ran through one way or another and unsuitable for LTR

When you hear the phrase "all women are whores" its commonly said by bitter incels who get no credibility, but that doesn't make what they're saying any less true. A woman never takes a break from dating period. While claiming to be single they're all talking to multiple guys at once and are...

looksmax.org

Dating Apps Ruin Women Faster Than You Think

In general for both men and women, the older we get the more bitter & jaded we become after each failed relationship, but this is exponentially exacerbated by apps like Tinder. I've personally witnessed so many girls in their late teens/early 20s change drastically into their mid/late 20s. They...

looksmax.org

 

[itisoverboyos]

Sounds dystopic. Anything that takes my liberty away is a big no.

You mean “her” freedom to get fucked by jamal and Tyrone

 

[Xangsane]

You mean “her” freedom to get fucked by jamal and Tyrone

 

[Xangsane]

Sounds dystopic. Anything that takes my liberty away is a big no.

Destroys pair bonding

 

[9cel]

I get pissed off when both women and men are promiscuous. REALLY pissed off

men are biologically pre disposed to fuck more than women, and guys who fuck alot are seen as physically attractive to women. Women seek out 2 things, good genes for offspring, and security and safety (paternal investment)

since the good genes chads arent gonna commit and give her paternal investment due to these factors listed
if they fuck alot of women, they have no paternal security guarantee. this is where women have evolved to conceal ovulation, a mating strategy known as strategic pluralism where she will fuck chad then find a beta into raising his offspring.

 

[Xangsane]

men are biologically pre disposed to fuck more than women, and guys who fuck alot are seen as physically attractive to women. Women seek out 2 things, good genes for offspring, and security and safety (paternal investment)

since the good genes chads arent gonna commit and give her paternal investment due to these factors listed
if they fuck alot of women, they have no paternal security guarantee. this is where women have evolved to conceal ovulation, a mating strategy known as strategic pluralism where she will fuck chad then find a beta into raising his offspring.

helps improve chad and foid pair bonding with their looksmatch.

 

[arab_chink]

That way:

• Pair bonding won't be fucked up for both women and Chadlite+
• Slayers don't hog women, women don't cry after being pumped and dumped
• Healthier relationships

What happens when trucels marry femcels, also isnt there more guys in the earth than females

 

[9cel]

helps improve chad and foid pair bonding with their looksmatch.

Chad will even cheat on stacey looksmatch, chad due to his high testosterone has all of his male urges x10 which will mean he will fuck as many women as possible and since all women will find him attractive and constantly approach him, coupled with the fact foids will want to fuck him then date a beta provider jfl getting LTRS is just cucked as a guy

 

[Xangsane]

Chad will even cheat on stacey looksmatch, chad due to his high testosterone has all of his male urges x10 which will mean he will fuck as many women as possible and since all women will find him attractive and constantly approach him, coupled with the fact foids will want to fuck him then date a beta provider jfl getting LTRS is just cucked as a guy

even stacy can cheat. Don't blame everything on chad

 

[Xangsane]

What happens when trucels marry femcels, also isnt there more guys in the earth than females

truecels and femcels might be happy together. It's the MTBs/LTBs that want chad

 

[arab_chink]

truecels and femcels might be happy together. It's the MTBs/LTBs that want chad

Yea trucels including people with genetic dieases, this will affect the child too

 

[9cel]

even stacy can cheat. Don't blame everything on chad

She is less likely to cheat, due to having an LTR with the best type of man possible which is extremely rare, for most women its no commitment from chad but commitment from a beta so when women get chad commitment why would they cheat?

 

[Xangsane]

She is less likely to cheat, due to having an LTR with the best type of man possible which is extremely rare, for most women its no commitment from chad but commitment from a beta so when women get chad commitment why would they cheat?

when a bigger chad comes

Yea trucels including people with genetic dieases, this will affect the child too

gene editing

 

[arab_chink]

when a bigger chad comes

gene editing

I wish we had access to gene editing but the govt wont likely let us

 

[Almost Chadlite]

Do I support society before social media? I think so yeah

 

[Xangsane]

Do I support society before social media? I think so yeah

y

I wish we had access to gene editing but the govt wont likely let us

((()))

 

[chaddyboi66]

Sounds dystopic. Anything that takes my liberty away is a big no.

You can convince people to get on board with almost anything if you try [gaslighting them] hard enough.

Govts have both all the time and money/resources they'd ever need at their disposal to make that happen , which they do on the regular.

A better approach would be to directly address the bigger underlying issue of hypergamy: girls' unreasonable expectations and obsession with looks over other factors that previously used to play more of a role into the dating market making it a bit more "fair".

Sure, looks have always mattered to an extent and no one [myself included obviously] even denies that fact...

However, either due to third wave feminism convincing girls to abuse their selective power in the dating market and that [average] men are worthless trash/evil, online dating and social media enabling this by providing a [seemingly] nigh constant supply of "high quality" HTN to Chadlite+ males and constantly either vilifying and/or disparaging guys under them, or even the overall general degradation of society as a whole causing people to obsess over more superficial qualities such as looks etc. we're now living in a period were the entire market is utterly fucked.

 

[Xangsane]

You can convince people to get on board with almost anything if you try [gaslighting them] hard enough.

Govts have both all the time and money/resources they'd ever need at their disposal to make that happen , which they do on the regular.

A better approach would be to directly address the bigger underlying issue of hypergamy: girls' unreasonable expectations and obsession with looks over other factors that previously used to play more of a role into the dating market making it a bit more "fair".

Sure, looks have always mattered to an extent and no one [myself included obviously] even denies that fact...

However, either due to third wave feminism convincing girls to abuse their selective power in the dating market and that [average] men are worthless trash/evil, online dating and social media enabling this by providing a [seemingly] nigh constant supply of "high quality" HTN to Chadlite+ males and constantly either vilifying and/or disparaging guys under them, or even the overall general degradation of society as a whole causing people to obsess over more superficial qualities such as looks etc. we're now living in a period were the entire market is utterly fucked.

All those MTB and below whores should be forced to fuck and date their looksmatch

 

[Deleted member 51781]

You can convince people to get on board with almost anything if you try [gaslighting them] hard enough.

Govts have both all the time and money/resources they'd ever need at their disposal to make that happen , which they do on the regular.

A better approach would be to directly address the bigger underlying issue of hypergamy: girls' unreasonable expectations and obsession with looks over other factors that previously used to play more of a role into the dating market making it a bit more "fair".

Sure, looks have always mattered to an extent and no one [myself included obviously] even denies that fact...

However, either due to third wave feminism convincing girls to abuse their selective power in the dating market and that [average] men are worthless trash/evil, online dating and social media enabling this by providing a [seemingly] nigh constant supply of "high quality" HTN to Chadlite+ males and constantly either vilifying and/or disparaging guys under them, or even the overall general degradation of society as a whole causing people to obsess over more superficial qualities such as looks etc. we're now living in a period were the entire market is utterly fucked.

Yeah, girls should definitely get more down to earth. How would the government be able to fix this, more specifically?

 

[chaddyboi66]

All those MTB and below whores should be forced to fuck and date their looksmatch

I somewhat agree for the most part; sub MTN in the dating hierarchy really shouldn't be afforded the privilege of being so picky, especially when they're not even good looking themselves.

 

[chaddyboi66]

Yeah, girls should definitely get more down to earth. How would the government be able to fix this, more specifically?

I'm not sure on specifics but...

A promotion of the idea that looks genuinely don't matter; rather looks shouldn't matter and you shouldn't pick your partner primarily based on that especially outside of your own league.

It'd need a massive psyop campaign and potentially some state or big lobby support too tbh, not to mention you'd have to run it for a while to un-fuck dating dynamics too.

 

[Deleted member 62811]

just remove tinder, social media and shit, and go back to the 60s

freedom of choice is needed or every female will feel like prostitute (they already are, but they don't realize)

 

[Xangsane]

I somewhat agree for the most part; sub MTN in the dating hierarchy really shouldn't be afforded the privilege of being so picky, especially when they're not even good looking themselves.

*sub MTB

 

[chaddyboi66]

*sub MTB

I understand it's inherently unfair since they get selective power by default and almost always abuse it, but do remember that it can also go both ways if given the opportunity...

I get pissed off when both women and men are promiscuous. REALLY pissed off

 

[Deleted member 46979]

forced as in via cultural indoctrination? yes. forced via state financed programs? then no. the latter usually works out, the latter always fails and produces worst outcomes.

 

[Xangsane]

I understand it's inherently unfair since they get selective power by default and almost always abuse it, but do remember that it can also go both ways if given the opportunity...

it destroys their pair bonding abilities and chad pair bonding abilities.

 

[chaddyboi66]

it destroys their pair bonding abilities and chad pair bonding abilities.

Throwing away their virginity does.

 

[Deleted member 14693]

Nah i dont support rape