Does how high set ur cheekbones are also affect how esr is percieved?

[PEENO08]

I noticed ppl with low esr tend not to look too cyclops when their cheekbones are low - mid set
Is this true? I need copes as a cyclops gookcel

 

[dhusc]

I noticed ppl with low esr tend not to look too cyclops when their cheekbones are low - mid set
Is this true? I need copes as a cyclops gookcel

No

 

[.dunkbro]

I noticed ppl with low esr tend not to look too cyclops when their cheekbones are low - mid set
Is this true? I need copes as a cyclops gookcel

yes, its true, look at Marlon texeira, Brad Pitt, Simon, etc

 

[mohito]

Yes. Esr is ipd divided by bizygomatic width. High set cheekbones usually result in more projected zygos, this lowers esr and makes the eyes appear more close set

 

[pfl]

yes, its true, look at Marlon texeira, Brad Pitt, Simon, etc

None of these guys have low esr

 

[PEENO08]

None of these guys have low esr

I think schlab is a better example
His esr is 0.425 but I didnt think his eyes looked close set at first

 

[.dunkbro]

None of these guys have low esr

they have low zygos, but none of their eyes look very close set they look normal? I dont understand this can you please explain

 

[kaydd]

they have low zygos, but none of their eyes look very close set they look normal? I dont understand this can you please explain

their lateral canthus to farthest zygo point isnt high, unlike low-esr cels. They just have higher ipd, but bigger orbital rims which makes up for it