Does reincarnation exist?

ExMisanthropy

ExMisanthropy

Bronze
Joined
Mar 4, 2025
Posts
300
Reputation
237
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
 
  • JFL
  • +1
Reactions: Delonier, fuckinnefor, Sicilian Cyclops and 3 others
You will most likely gonna born as dalit slumlord, sucking your Dravidian momma's black saggy tiddies
 
  • +1
Reactions: fuckinnefor, HairVolume, Stranger to myself and 7 others
i hope not i dont want another life after this one
 
If it exists you will reincarnate the same or even worse, check what natal chart is
 
  • +1
Reactions: afkaik
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
you can kill yourself but theres ~40% chance you will be born pajeet or chink, and 85.5% chance you will be born under 6ft
 
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin and afkaik
you can kill yourself but theres ~40% chance you will be born pajeet or chink, and 85.5% chance you will be born under 6ft
I just keep killing myself until I become a chad. Gambling but with my life
 
  • JFL
Reactions: Sicilian Cyclops
I just keep killing myself until I become a chad. Gambling but with my life
u wont remember getting reincarnated, so you will have to live subhuman life alot of times until you maybe get lucky and then repeat the cycle
 
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
Reincarnation in general philosophy, presupposes that the amount of living beings on the Earth remain the same however as for the course of the whole history, this has never been the truth. Thus reincarnation is not true

Moreover, reincarnation would only be scientifically possible if we have had atleas one instance of it before, which is also not true.

Even the reincarnation in different religions that states that reincarnation occurs till you reach an absolute state and then you do not exist in this world anymore would let to the deduction that the amount of living beings should thus decrease, which is again not true as for the whole history.

Believing in reincarnation is simply a coping mechanism for those who have failed in life and want to delude themselves, believing in reincarnation is not different than bluepill when it comes to delusion.
 
  • So Sad
  • +1
Reactions: bimaxmaxxer and Сигма Бой
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
Do it then, cant know without trying
 
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
yeah but ur not gonna reincarnate as a chad. u dont have enough positive karma for that
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 72614 and Wexilarious
The fact it’s in looksmax section is too funny.
 
  • +1
Reactions: diditeverbegin
Reincarnation in general philosophy, presupposes that the amount of living beings on the Earth remain the same however as for the course of the whole history, this has never been the truth. Thus reincarnation is not true

Moreover, reincarnation would only be scientifically possible if we have had atleas one instance of it before, which is also not true.

Even the reincarnation in different religions that states that reincarnation occurs till you reach an absolute state and then you do not exist in this world anymore would let to the deduction that the amount of living beings should thus decrease, which is again not true as for the whole history.

Believing in reincarnation is simply a coping mechanism for those who have failed in life and want to delude themselves, believing in reincarnation is not different than bluepill when it comes to delusion.
reincarnation is not a basis of belief. its simply structured in a way that low iq people are unable to comprehend.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 72614 and Wexilarious
Hinduism believes in a cycle of birth, death, and rebirth known as Samsara. A soul (Atman) is reborn in different forms based on its karma (actions from past lives). This cycle continues until moksha (liberation) is attained.

Good karma leads to a higher birth (e.g., as a noble human or divine being).

Bad karma leads to a lower birth (e.g., as an animal or suffering human).

Rebirth is influenced by Dharma (righteous duty) and Bhakti (devotion).

Moksha is the end of the rebirth cycle, achieved through:

Jnana (knowledge) – Realizing the true nature of the self (Atman).

Bhakti (devotion) – Surrendering to God (e.g., Vishnu, Shiva).

Karma Yoga (selfless action) – Acting without attachment to results.
 
  • +1
Reactions: Deleted member 72614, Wexilarious and LLcel
It's not the truth, that's all matters.
its not the truth in your subjective perception (which i can tell is low iq bc of ur ignorance towards the topic) doesnt make it objectively wrong. either way it doesnt matter bc we can infinitely go back and fourth with no net positive end. When i was a little kid i thought what happened after death is whatever you wanted to happen so lets stick with that which makes everyones claim right.
 
Reincarnation in general philosophy, presupposes that the amount of living beings on the Earth remain the same however as for the course of the whole history, this has never been the truth. Thus reincarnation is not true

Moreover, reincarnation would only be scientifically possible if we have had atleas one instance of it before, which is also not true.

Even the reincarnation in different religions that states that reincarnation occurs till you reach an absolute state and then you do not exist in this world anymore would let to the deduction that the amount of living beings should thus decrease, which is again not true as for the whole history.

Believing in reincarnation is simply a coping mechanism for those who have failed in life and want to delude themselves, believing in reincarnation is not different than bluepill when it comes to delusion.
Vrong. Its not universal. It's not cope but you can't control shit about your reincarnation unless youve been born into an occult circle. Or have money and power. 0.1% of ppl basically. Ofc it doesnt work universally, heaven doesn't work that way either. Its all manmade. The only thing you can do supernaturally is will yourself out bad financial situation. That's it.
 
its not the truth in your subjective perception (which i can tell is low iq bc of ur ignorance towards the topic) doesnt make it objectively wrong. either way it doesnt matter bc we can infinitely go back and fourth with no net positive end. When i was a little kid i thought what happened after death is whatever you wanted to happen so lets stick with that which makes everyones claim right.
I just disproved the entirety of reincarnation in my first comment, mate and you're so retarded that you could not comprehend a single sentence that I said so you just spit out a few random words and made random unbacked claims of me being low IQ.

Have you ever picked up a book in your life "LLSurgeryEnthusiast" or do you just go around calling everyone low IQ so you can feel good about your dumb retarded brain that cannot even process simple refutations?
 
  • Woah
  • +1
Reactions: Wexilarious and Kayra139
For context: I want to kill myself, and I want to know if reincarnation is real, so that I can kill myself and become a chad.
Do not do it, heaven & hell is way more likely than reincarnation cuz you can't prove that shit with any scriptures
 
  • +1
Reactions: lost222 and Zodiac
Vrong. Its not universal. It's not cope but you can't control shit about your reincarnation unless youve been born into an occult circle. Or have money and power. 0.1% of ppl basically. Ofc it doesnt work universally, heaven doesn't work that way either. Its all manmade. The only thing you can do supernaturally is will yourself out bad financial situation. That's it.
What the fuck are you talking about?

Whether it's cope or not, it simply isn't the truth and I explain in the comment how it simply cannot scientifically be the truth, you have done nothing except ignoring the refutations.

Fuck are you talking abt "supernaturally".

I'm surprised by the amount of stupidity in these replies.
 
I just disproved the entirety of reincarnation in my first comment, mate and you're so retarded that you could not comprehend a single sentence that I said so you just spit out a few random words and made random unbacked claims of me being low IQ.

Have you ever picked up a book in your life "LLSurgeryEnthusiast" or do you just go around calling everyone low IQ so you can feel good about your dumb retarded brain that cannot even process simple refutations?
nigga claimed to disprove something that is no where near remotely feasible for the human brain to process :lul:. nigga set a knight as a pfp to protrude some sense of intelligence to the other idiots who rot on this site with 0 ability to think for themselves other than going with the first thing they see :feelswah:. insanity is whats rooted in your brain and delusion is how you live with it. absolute chimp still using the causation = correlation theory which is the first thing you learn in HS psychology :kys:. i refuse to believe u are even a human being atp a chat gpt prompt would have ragebaitted better than u.

@Wexilarious
@Stranger to myself


Whats the dumbest take youve ever heard from a yonko fan v0 djt78gwek0wd1
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: fxckz, Stranger to myself and Wexilarious
nigga claimed to disprove something that is no where near remotely feasible for the human brain to process :lul:. nigga set a knight as a pfp to protrude some sense of intelligence to the other idiots who rot on this site with 0 ability to think for themselves other than going with the first thing they see :feelswah:. insanity is whats rooted in your brain and delusion is how you live with it. absolute chimp still using the causation = correlation theory which is the first thing you learn in HS psychology :kys:. i refuse to believe u are even a human being atp a chat gpt prompt would have ragebaitted better than u.

@Wexilarious
@Stranger to myself


View attachment 3565932
There is something in the natal chart that could indicate that a person cannot even think that such a thing could exist, he probably has it
 
  • +1
  • JFL
Reactions: fxckz and LLcel
There is something in the natal chart that could indicate that a person cannot even think that such a thing could exist, he probably has it
whether its the natal chart or some gene ive come to the conclusion that these people lack the ability of comprehending something rather than it being a choice. smile and wave :bigbrain:
 
  • +1
Reactions: fxckz and Wexilarious
nigga claimed to disprove something that is no where near remotely feasible for the human brain to process :lul:. nigga set a knight as a pfp to protrude some sense of intelligence to the other idiots who rot on this site with 0 ability to think for themselves other than going with the first thing they see :feelswah:. insanity is whats rooted in your brain and delusion is how you live with it. absolute chimp still using the causation = correlation theory which is the first thing you learn in HS psychology :kys:. i refuse to believe u are even a human being atp a chat gpt prompt would have ragebaitted better than u.

@Wexilarious
@Stranger to myself


View attachment 3565932
Your claim : Reincarnation is impossible for the human brain to logically process.

Evidence for the claim : 404 error

Fallacies in the claim : If reincarnation is impossible for me as a human to process then it is also impossible for you to process and for every human being that exists thus the word reincarnation cannot be perfectly defined by anyone an thus a word that cannot be defined cannot be used and thus reincarnation does not exist.

More fallacies : You claimed that I used "correlation is causation" but NOWHERE did I ever mention the two things nor used them. I don't know where the fuck you got them from, but you're mentally challenged so it's ok.


You have failed to refute my original points and just keep on blabbering nonsense.


Ad hominem "You put on knight and you think u are smart so u are wrong"

No evidence for any of the above, thus illogical.
I put on a knight pfp because of me being fond of chess, nothing else.


Not only have you failed to refute me, but also have failed to comprehend my points and you've committed several strawmans to make yourself feel like you have won.

My brain refuses to believe that someone this retarded can even exist.
 
  • Hmm...
Reactions: LLcel
What the fuck are you talking about?

Whether it's cope or not, it simply isn't the truth and I explain in the comment how it simply cannot scientifically be the truth, you have done nothing except ignoring the refutations.

Fuck are you talking abt "supernaturally".

I'm surprised by the amount of stupidity in these replies.
The supernatural is real. Thats what im trynna say. Reincarnation is real too. Its no inherently so. I don't know how you can wrap your head around this you fucking monkey. Why would people all over the world believe in some nonsense, all coordinated at the same time? Do you think superstition comes from absolutely nowhere? Why? Ask yourself. Why would anyone waste time with this stuff if it wasn't real you stupid bitch. Of course its hard to replicate, this is metaphysics, and it requires years to even get to see something that affirms faith and isn't gay like christianity. The healing miracles, the placebo effect, the eucharistic miracles, Marian apparitions, the consistency of flood myths across cultures, the psychological symbolism of most of the Indo-European cultures before christianity, timing, synchronicities, the public miracles of the Buddha or modern day healing miracles in Orthodoxy or Vajrayana. Or just fucking look at any actual religion up close. Its not muh confirmation bias and cope. And no, it does not make the world any less cruel, you stupid fuck. Its man made. Reincarnation doesn't exist in the animal kingdom. It didn't exist before humans made it up, and made it truth. A lie becomes truth through will. Do you understand now?
 
  • +1
Reactions: LLcel
The supernatural is real. Thats what im trynna say. Reincarnation is real too. Its no inherently so. I don't know how you can wrap your head around this you fucking monkey. Why would people all over the world believe in some nonsense, all coordinated at the same time? Do you think superstition comes from absolutely nowhere? Why? Ask yourself. Why would anyone waste time with this stuff if it wasn't real you stupid bitch. Of course its hard to replicate, this is metaphysics, and it requires years to even get to see something that affirms faith and isn't gay like christianity. The healing miracles, the placebo effect, the eucharistic miracles, Marian apparitions, the consistency of flood myths across cultures, the psychological symbolism of most of the Indo-European cultures before christianity, timing, synchronicities, the public miracles of the Buddha or modern day healing miracles in Orthodoxy or Vajrayana. Or just fucking look at any actual religion up close. Its not muh confirmation bias and cope. And no, it does not make the world any less cruel, you stupid fuck. Its man made. Reincarnation doesn't exist in the animal kingdom. It didn't exist before humans made it up, and made it truth. A lie becomes truth through will. Do you understand now?
DNR.

I don't believe in lies and emotions, I only talk through logic and science.

Pick up a book, you fucking cave clown.
 
Your claim : Reincarnation is impossible for the human brain to logically process.

Evidence for the claim : 404 error

Fallacies in the claim : If reincarnation is impossible for me as a human to process then it is also impossible for you to process and for every human being that exists thus the word reincarnation cannot be perfectly defined by anyone an thus a word that cannot be defined cannot be used and thus reincarnation does not exist.

More fallacies : You claimed that I used "correlation is causation" but NOWHERE did I ever mention the two things nor used them. I don't know where the fuck you got them from, but you're mentally challenged so it's ok.


You have failed to refute my original points and just keep on blabbering nonsense.


Ad hominem "You put on knight and you think u are smart so u are wrong"

No evidence for any of the above, thus illogical.
I put on a knight pfp because of me being fond of chess, nothing else.


Not only have you failed to refute me, but also have failed to comprehend my points and you've committed several strawmans to make yourself feel like you have won.

My brain refuses to believe that someone this retarded can even exist.
funny that you mention strawmans since this entire response is one big strawman. there is no possibility of reasoning in the supernatural/spiritual with logic. it cannot be done therefore you claim you are correct? you failed to understand what I mentioned in my earlier posts. coexistence of ideas clearly has no significance to you nor have you put in the effort of trying to see it from a 4th party perspective. intuition and the 6th sense cannot be proven or disproven within the realm of understanding that the mammal body is accustomed to. If i talk to an ant do you think it would understand what im saying? could i logically prove something to it? just because you reside at a lower frequency than me doesn't make me wrong. why do you think every single religion prevalent in todays society still exists if it's so unbelievably easy to debunk with common sense and "logical reasoning" it's because terms like faith have deeper meaning than the label given to them. the second you try to put words to a thought the idea loses half its meaning. every thing rooted from a person is subjective tying it to some innate bias whether you believe it or not. obviously from your perspective you think you are right (and you are) its not that difficult to think logically lmao but realize the unknown is something that isnt perceivable with only 1 lens of thought. never mind the mumbo jumbo it doesnt change the outcome of the situation, i certainly am not living my life in a lower fashion because I believe in something that (is or isnt true) only time will tell. Whether you're an atheist like I used to be a few months ago and choose to devote a part of your time to playing devils advocate with religious people doesnt matter to me because i dont care. I never even stated that I believe in the type of reincarnation that OP was talking about rather the infinite universe theory which funny enough is something you can prove with your "logic" so ironically enough we are the same :lul:. I think it would benefit you to look into various ancient scripts and try deciphering them from angles aside from logic. I acknowledge your effort in proving your point and admire your high iq takes which came with that but I still hold true to my own belief of 1 way in thinking being illogical in proving the various spectrums of life especially when it comes to stuff like this.
 
What the fuck are you talking about?

Whether it's cope or not, it simply isn't the truth and I explain in the comment how it simply cannot scientifically be the truth, you have done nothing except ignoring the refutations.

Fuck are you talking abt "supernaturally".

I'm surprised by the amount of stupidity in these replies.
Youre a retard man its pretty clear, some things cant be explained by science and you just have to accept it
 
  • +1
Reactions: LLcel
Youre a retard man its pretty clear, some things cant be explained by science and you just have to accept it
Every single thing has to be explained by science and logic. If something cannot be explained by science and logic both then it simply doesn't exist.

Your statements are so ignorant, have you ever even read a book in your life? It feels like I'm talking to a wall lmfao.

Dude's only evidence is "It can't be explained by science" jfl.

Fucking dumbfuck.
 
It's not a coincidence that the believe of reincarnation is mostly common in places like India and their wonderful looking representants.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fxckz
funny that you mention strawmans since this entire response is one big strawman.

You clearly don't know what strawman means as whatever I replied to was exactly what you said.

there is no possibility of reasoning in the supernatural/spiritual with logic. it cannot be done therefore you claim you are correct?

No, therefore you're wrong.

And I'm correct because of my first comment where I refuted any possibility of the existence of reincarnation.

AND brother, YOU'VE JUST UTTERED THE MOST IGNORANT STATEMENT TO EVER EXIST "THERE IS NO POSSIBILITY OF REASONING IN THE SUPERNATURAL WITH LOGIC".

This just told me that you've never even read about reincarnation or anything philosophically related because if you did then you'd know that even the necessary being has to comply with logic.

you failed to understand what I mentioned in my earlier posts. coexistence of ideas clearly has no significance to you nor have you put in the effort of trying to see it from a 4th party perspective.
Dude, there is no point in seeing something from a 4th party that simply isn't true. What isn't objectively true, will never be true from any point of view.

And you mentioned nothing hecause you know nothing, you just said random nonsense in the name of "Humans cant understand it" jfl.

ntuition and the 6th sense cannot be proven or disproven within the realm of understanding that the mammal body is accustomed to.

Intuition has nothing to do with reincarnation, try again.

No one is born with believing in reincarnation.

An oxford study was done in 20 countries that concluded that children believe in a superior power and an afterlife (Intuition) that isn't reincarnation.



6th sense, even cavemen don't believe in this anymore.

If i talk to an ant do you think it would understand what im saying? could i logically prove something to it?
Something that isn't logically possible can never exist.

just because you reside at a lower frequency than me doesn't make me wrong.

You have provided 0 proof to your argument and have just blabbered nonsense like "Im not wrong, u arent wrong, we are both right" theres only one truth and you fail to accept it because you don't want to pop your own balloon

why do you think every single religion prevalent in todays society still exists if it's so unbelievably easy to debunk with common sense and "logical reasoning" it's because terms like faith have deeper meaning than the label given to them.
There's still objective truth, it doesn't change the fact that most of the religions are merely delusions.

the second you try to put words to a thought the idea loses half its meaning. every thing rooted from a person is subjective tying it to some innate bias whether you believe it or not. obviously from your perspective you think you are right (and you are) its not that difficult to think logically lmao but realize the unknown is something that isnt perceivable with only 1 lens of thought.
Objective truth is something that is taught in the basics of philosophy, you're unknowledgeable in this topic and you just told me that.
never mind the mumbo jumbo it doesnt change the outcome of the situation, i certainly am not living my life in a lower fashion because I believe in something that (is or isnt true) only time will tell. Whether you're an atheist like I used to be a few months ago and choose to devote a part of your time to playing devils advocate with religious people doesnt matter to me because i dont care. I never even stated that I believe in the type of reincarnation that OP was talking about rather the infinite universe theory which funny enough is something you can prove with your "logic" so ironically enough we are the same :lul:.
Actually, the infinite universe theory isn't something that can be logically proved.

If the universe is expanding currently as according to science, then it must be finite and if it were eternal as according to the theory, then it should always have been infinite.

Something can't be both finite and infinite.

I think it would benefit you to look into various ancient scripts and try deciphering them from angles aside from logic.
Keep deluding yourself mate, you live in a cave
I acknowledge your effort in proving your point and admire your high iq takes which came with that but I still hold true to my own belief of 1 way in thinking being illogical in proving the various spectrums of life especially when it comes to stuff like this.
Your way is wrong and you need to argue with logicality and science.

Everything that is objectively true can be explained with science and logic.

If everyone adopted the same Pov as you which essentially is that we both are correct then the truth would never be found.
 
Last edited:
believing in reincarnation is not different than bluepill when it comes to delusion.
You are right, very right, but if I found concrete evidence that reincarnation is real, then imma kill myself.
 
You are right, very right, but if I found concrete evidence that reincarnation is real, then imma kill myself.
After I disproved reincarnation in my first comment, you'll never find any concrete evidence that isn't a lie as it doesn't exist.

Spend a bit more time reading my comment and you'll now why.

Reincarnation doesn't exist. I'm indeed truthful.
 
  • +1
Reactions: fxckz
After I disproved reincarnation in my first comment, you'll never find any concrete evidence that isn't a lie as it doesn't exist.

Spend a bit more time reading my comment and you'll now why.

Reincarnation doesn't exist. I'm indeed truthful.
I did, so
"presupposes that the amount of living beings on the Earth remain the same however as for the course of the whole history, this has never been the truth." - well, it doesnt disprove reincarnation since reincarnation could also be scattered randomly, so it would still be logical.
"reincarnation would only be scientifically possible if we have had atleas one instance of it before" - Your right, but science also didnt prove nor disprove reincarnation
and for your religion point, I am not religious. I'm using reincarnation as a cope as you say
 
After I disproved reincarnation in my first comment, you'll never find any concrete evidence that isn't a lie as it doesn't exist.

Spend a bit more time reading my comment and you'll now why.

Reincarnation doesn't exist. I'm indeed truthful.
From your point, I can say that reincarnation is not proven nor disproven
 
I did, so
"presupposes that the amount of living beings on the Earth remain the same however as for the course of the whole history, this has never been the truth." - well, it doesnt disprove reincarnation since reincarnation could also be scattered randomly, so it would still be logical.
"reincarnation would only be scientifically possible if we have had atleas one instance of it before" - Your right, but science also didnt prove nor disprove reincarnation
and for your religion point, I am not religious. I'm using reincarnation as a cope as you say
Science did disprove reincarnation mate.

You said "reincarnation couldalso be scattered randomly"

This statement doesn't make sense, it's "order" never was the problem. It's 'amount' was.

The amount of living beings has either decreased or remained the same according to reincarnation however the reality is otherwise.

So it is disproven.
 
This statement doesn't make sense, it's "order" never was the problem. It's 'amount' was.

The amount of living beings has either decreased or remained the same according to reincarnation however the reality is otherwise.
Reincarnation I am talking about is, the literal word itself, coming back to life into another human, not the religion stand point.
 
Reincarnation I am talking about is, the literal word itself, coming back to life into another human, not the religion stand point.
The one you talk abt presupposes that the amount of humans remain the same brother.

Which I covered in my comment
 
The one you talk abt presupposes that the amount of humans remain the same brother.

Which I covered in my comment
I already say that reincarnation could be scattered randomly. Population amount increasing or decreasing does not disprove reincarnation. Let say a time period where population amount is at the highest, not only reincarnated soul but new soul would exist at that same time period.

You think reincarnation as a consistent regeneration concept, but that would mean that our soul did not have a first body. Which would not make sense since our universe itself started as a big bang.
 
  • +1
Reactions: LLcel

Similar threads

ruz
Replies
5
Views
72
KB_maxxer
KB_maxxer
G
Replies
7
Views
123
ascendantwill
A
N
Replies
60
Views
710
kazama
kazama
Tallooksmaxxer
Replies
5
Views
95
goyimslayer
goyimslayer
Halcyon0x
Replies
8
Views
89
Halcyon0x
Halcyon0x

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top