qazw
SEAmaxxing > Ropemaxxing
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2024
- Posts
- 866
- Reputation
- 1,314
I have a new theory on the downfall of the west: DOGS AND CATS
If dogs and cats were banned, the white population would start having babies again and then we can finally stop importing millions of new deathnics every year. It would also reduce hypergamy and bring back healthy families.
White women want a dog/cat far more than they wants a baby. White women would rather stay single forever with a family of dogs or cats instead of settling for a sub-HTN husband that they can make a family with. Even if a woman does get married and have kids, she will want to have pet dogs or cats before having children. But the pet will become a burden and limit the number of children made.
Dogs and cats mog babies in terms of cuteness and it needs to be stopped. Cute videos of dogs and cats are everywhere online but cute baby videos are rare af. I remember a time when babies were considered cute but this seems to have become unpopular in recent years. I haven't heard anyone refer to a baby as cute in years, people usually call babies loud and annoying instead.
Propaganda tells women that they need to be strong and independent. They don’t need a man so they don’t want to settle for anything below HTN. Pets facilitate this and allow women to avoid their natural reproductive responsibilities. Women get to pretend to be a “furmom” to their pet which means they get to meet their instinctual motherly urges. Pets also provide companionship and love which eliminates loneliness and removes the need for relationships with men. If you’re a believer in the dogpill, you understand that sexual urges can also be satisfied.
If pets were banned, women would start to feel the loneliness and motherly urges that are natural mechanisms to incentivise us to reproduce. I predict it would mean a lot of women settle for marrying their looksmatch to create a family with him.
I’m a strong believer in the reproductionpill (I might do another theory post on this), which is that the true meaning in life is to reproduce. If you don’t create children and raise them in a family setting, you will never be able to achieve true happiness because you are biologically programmed to do it.
Still aren't convinced, look at CHINA:
China has the largest population on earth. How? Because they EAT DOGS AND CATS. They don't keep them as pets to replace babies and a husband.
The solution:
If dogs and cats were banned, the white population would start having babies again and then we can finally stop importing millions of new deathnics every year. It would also reduce hypergamy and bring back healthy families.
White women want a dog/cat far more than they wants a baby. White women would rather stay single forever with a family of dogs or cats instead of settling for a sub-HTN husband that they can make a family with. Even if a woman does get married and have kids, she will want to have pet dogs or cats before having children. But the pet will become a burden and limit the number of children made.
Dogs and cats mog babies in terms of cuteness and it needs to be stopped. Cute videos of dogs and cats are everywhere online but cute baby videos are rare af. I remember a time when babies were considered cute but this seems to have become unpopular in recent years. I haven't heard anyone refer to a baby as cute in years, people usually call babies loud and annoying instead.
Propaganda tells women that they need to be strong and independent. They don’t need a man so they don’t want to settle for anything below HTN. Pets facilitate this and allow women to avoid their natural reproductive responsibilities. Women get to pretend to be a “furmom” to their pet which means they get to meet their instinctual motherly urges. Pets also provide companionship and love which eliminates loneliness and removes the need for relationships with men. If you’re a believer in the dogpill, you understand that sexual urges can also be satisfied.
If pets were banned, women would start to feel the loneliness and motherly urges that are natural mechanisms to incentivise us to reproduce. I predict it would mean a lot of women settle for marrying their looksmatch to create a family with him.
I’m a strong believer in the reproductionpill (I might do another theory post on this), which is that the true meaning in life is to reproduce. If you don’t create children and raise them in a family setting, you will never be able to achieve true happiness because you are biologically programmed to do it.
Still aren't convinced, look at CHINA:
China has the largest population on earth. How? Because they EAT DOGS AND CATS. They don't keep them as pets to replace babies and a husband.
The solution:
- Ban cute videos of dogs and cats online
- Start a government propaganda bot farm that churns out videos of ugly dogs and cats hurting white women and artificially make them go viral to make sure everyone sees it on their tiktok/instagram feed. Then the bot farm should spread misinformation and hatred towards dogs/cats in the comment sections
- This propaganda bot farm should also churn out pro-family propaganda: white families with looksmatched parents getting a big family of cute babies. Similarly, this should be pushed to the whole population via social media and the bots should spread positive comments towards it
- Impose a hefty dog/cat tax to make it unaffordable to own a dog/cat. But this tax is removed if you are married with 3 non-mixed children
